okay first of all: if you run N'zoth, you usually also run deathlord and belcher or applebaum. second of all, two oozes is too much, just no. third of all I love the idea, and Finally, I dont think you want to run glowstone
thanks. I ended up crafting faceless shambler and molten giant for my evenlock though... probably going to work on this next though so thanks.
I suggest not to. your original deck was significantly better, this deck is weaker due to having poor board clears (who runs only one dragonfire anyways?)
As i thought. Compared to my even pala this feels clunky... The loss of the 1 mana HP is huge :-/. It´s at least funny against mechathun decks and OTK paladins LoL :-). And i learned a new way to build so ...
lesser emerald spellstone - same cost but takes 2 secrets to upgrade instead of 1
deathstalker rexxar - costs 9 mana but deals 4 damage to all enemy minions
animal companion - costs 4 mana but you can choose which beast companion to summon
thoughts?
daaamn i hope these are true, seem pretty fair. I am a wild player and hate hunters because those bitchassnibbas just complain to me because i play wild cards when they dont.... like biiich whuuutt?
but standard is what it is anyways, the whole format is weird... even shaman is absolute bullshit in wild, everyone hates it, its almost as bad as wild
if you havent opened packs from those sets= 4 free legendaries, and if you have you still have a very high chance of getting one or more so yea, amazing dust for the value
I play only wild, and the only time i BM is when i either pull an exodia mage's velen or a big priests barnes with my dirty rat, or discard them with gnome HAHA, YOU'VE BEEN... GNOMED!
0
glass knight out btw, and deathlord in, gives a great bit of survivability and helps overall against several decks
0
oh and BTW Tinkmaster is a better tech against big priest than sylvanas, but its more or less a question of taste
2
okay first of all: if you run N'zoth, you usually also run deathlord and belcher or applebaum. second of all, two oozes is too much, just no. third of all I love the idea, and Finally, I dont think you want to run glowstone
1
I suggest not to. your original deck was significantly better, this deck is weaker due to having poor board clears (who runs only one dragonfire anyways?)
0
I dont think so since their card text is a bit different, but lets wait for op to confirm
0
SELF PROMOTION!!! STOP IT AND SHUT THE HELL UP
0
LOOOL murloc shaman in standard?? WHAT A JOKE!
0
would have been nice IF IT WASNT JUST DRUID!! URGGH
0
daaamn i hope these are true, seem pretty fair. I am a wild player and hate hunters because those bitchassnibbas just complain to me because i play wild cards when they dont.... like biiich whuuutt?
0
but standard is what it is anyways, the whole format is weird... even shaman is absolute bullshit in wild, everyone hates it, its almost as bad as wild
0
WuT? ThIs Is IlLeGaL!
0
if you havent opened packs from those sets= 4 free legendaries, and if you have you still have a very high chance of getting one or more so yea, amazing dust for the value
0
i do not believe it is allowed to use stuff you did before as proof, thats kinda cheating because you did it beforehand
0
no everyfin is awesome or coldlight??? wut
1
I play only wild, and the only time i BM is when i either pull an exodia mage's velen or a big priests barnes with my dirty rat, or discard them with gnome HAHA, YOU'VE BEEN... GNOMED!