• 6

    posted a message on Where is your integrity?
    Quote from HSam >>

    "Please don't use decks with the highest winrate when the objective of ladder is to win!"

    Cancel culture seeping into video games, great.

     I dont think you understand cancel culture

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Has Blizzard lost control of your card collection?
    Quote from DeafKnight >>
    Quote from theeshyguy2000 >>
    Quote from DeafKnight >>
    Quote from Keema >>

    The reason Blizzard are making the artificial distinction is they don't want to give players cards, they want to loan them for the season (and remove them later). I.e. because they are greedy.

    This whole "Blizzard are so greedy" shtick is becoming very overdone. What is being described is not even "greed". It's entitlement (again).
    For example:

    Entitled guy : Hey that's a nice car! Wish I had one like that.
    Other guy : Oh, well here's the keys. You can borrow it for a bit.
    Entitled guy : You mean it's mine to keep, right?
    Other guy : No, I'm lending it to you so you can use it. I can't just give it to you for free.
    Entitled guy : Ehrmegherd! You is liek, so grEeDy! 

     What? That metaphor doesn't work AT ALL. The Core Set isn't just a free bonus, it's a REPLACEMENT of the basic and classic sets. People earned classic cards, built up a collection of them, and Blizzard decided that even classic wasn't safe from being rotated. Better example:

    Guy: You sold my car? The one that I owned and paid for?

    Other Guy: Yeah but I got you a new one.

    Guy: Can I at least keep that one?

    Other Guy: No. You're borrowing it.

    Guy: Okay... Is it new at least?

    Other Guy: Somewhat.

     I take it you haven't actually looked at your set to see how incorrect your comment is?
    Because when I look in mine, I can see all the cards I collected, alongside all the NEW cards that I got literally for free without having to do anything for them.

    Guess that's the old Blizzard greed coming into play right there, giving away free stuff. Damn them. I didn't ask for anything and they forced me to have more stuff... so evil... much greed...

    What your misinformed analogy SHOULD have said was:

    Guy: I bought you a new car to use.
    Other guy: But I already have that car
    Guy: Ok, well this is a spare one to use (in case you didn't have it already)
    Other guy: Can I keep it?
    Guy: Well, no. It was just a loan. And you already have it, you said
    Other Guy: Yeah, but you're loaning another one to me, so my entitlement states I should keep it.
    Guy: Uh, that's not how loans work...
    Other Guy: I DESERVE TO HAVE THIS FOR FREE, FOR PLAYING THE GAME YOU WORKED ON FOR ME! sO GReEdY!!!!11!1!

     Youre an idiot bro lmao read my last post. You do not understand the concept of loans, maybe take an economics course. Both of your metaphors were just flat out wrong bud and way off the mark. But hey if you wanna keep thanking and praising blizzard for giving you what you think are free cards. Go apply for a loan at your local bank, they would be thrilled to trap you in their debt scheme. Oooo free money 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Has Blizzard lost control of your card collection?
    Quote from theeshyguy2000 >>
    Quote from DeafKnight >>
    Quote from Keema >>

    The reason Blizzard are making the artificial distinction is they don't want to give players cards, they want to loan them for the season (and remove them later). I.e. because they are greedy.

    This whole "Blizzard are so greedy" shtick is becoming very overdone. What is being described is not even "greed". It's entitlement (again).
    For example:

    Entitled guy : Hey that's a nice car! Wish I had one like that.
    Other guy : Oh, well here's the keys. You can borrow it for a bit.
    Entitled guy : You mean it's mine to keep, right?
    Other guy : No, I'm lending it to you so you can use it. I can't just give it to you for free.
    Entitled guy : Ehrmegherd! You is liek, so grEeDy! 

     What? That metaphor doesn't work AT ALL. The Core Set isn't just a free bonus, it's a REPLACEMENT of the basic and classic sets. People earned classic cards, built up a collection of them, and Blizzard decided that even classic wasn't safe from being rotated. Better example:

    Guy: You sold my car? The one that I owned and paid for?

    Other Guy: Yeah but I got you a new one.

    Guy: Can I at least keep that one?

    Other Guy: No. You're borrowing it.

    Guy: Okay... Is it new at least?

    Other Guy: Somewhat.

     Someone who actually understands the concept of loans. I made a similar complaint about this earlier when core was first announced and everybody dogged on me like I was some idiot. Like, do people really not understand the concept of loaning us a collection for a year and then possibly taking that away and putting new cards in, so we will still, in the long run, have to spend resources to get the “old” core set cards that were new to the game. It doesn’t take a lot of thinking to understand lol, i’m glad someone else gets it. We all spent time and resources to get the classic cards which they told us would never roatate. Then the classic set rotated, making all the time and resources we spent worthless (if you dont play wild) and then LOANED us a core collection that will EVENTUALLY rotate out. However many years it takes, the core set will eventually look completely different and we will have to spend more time and resources to collect the cards that which we were originally loaned. People are stupid lmao no wonder banks rule the world.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Control is dead because...
    Quote from fabjx >>

    As if Tickatus wasn't total braindead too. And the way you think is as well. Control decks designed to destroy other control decks is an idiotic concept. It is like cannibalizing control so that aggro can break free undisturbed. Retardedness at its finest

    I already explained how tickatus is more of an anti-combo card than an anti-control card, which is what it is supposed to be. Control is weak against combo decks so tickatus answers that problem perfectly. But again, I explained this in my earlier post so I guess youre brain dead while reading, as well as while playing hearthstone decks you copied and pasted from google.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Warlock allowed to destroy entire deck with Tickatus in ranked?
    Quote from enoX_36 >>

    It should cost 12 and remove 20 cards from your deck, if it's corrupted then destroy your own hero. Such a broken card with 90% played winrate and every tickatus deck having over 80% wr is not healthy for the game. It feeds on no brain control decks, it's literally at Mindrender Illucia's level of insta win against otk decks, it beats aggro so easily because warlocks have 31 aoe cards in their decks and heal for 25+ every game because of the soul fragments. Who even had the idea to make control warlock so bonkers? It will define the standard meta for the next 3 years.

     So much in this post screams ‘I dont understand this game’.

    First off, tickatus decks have nowhere near 80% winrates, try 40% range, definitely under 50% last time I checked.

    Second, no brain control decks? Name one other than wild big priest, aggro is the “brain dead” archetype and even some aggro decks require specific sequencing etc. and true control as an archetype hasn’t been a thing (in wild at least, where I play all my games) since WoToG or even before then.

    Third, tickatus is nowhere near mindrender illucia’s power level. Tickatus is much much MUCH slower and the player has to be ahead on board or at least not behind to play tickatus. Illucia is 3 mana and can pretty much steal a win if a good player knows the matchup and when to play her. 

    Finally, aggro is the one of the matchups that tickatus decks specifically get farmed for exp. aggro will destroy tickatus decks more times than not because, like I said before, tickatus decks are too slow for aggro matchups.

    Tickatus decks get stomped by faster combo decks as well like wild raza priest unless you get lucky and burn one of their combo pieces which isn’t likely because again tickatus is extra slow and mostly comes out around turn 8 at the earliest. 

    Tickatus is literally a tech/counter card for grindy control matchups which is what it is perfect for honestly, giving you card advantage and giving your opponent a disadvantage if you burn something important. And it puts them closer to fatigue. It’s a control tech card, and it performs its role perfectly.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 1

    posted a message on Warlock allowed to destroy entire deck with Tickatus in ranked?
    Quote from Diimon >>
    Quote from shad0wseek3r >>

    Youre allowed to have 40-40 stats on board every turn with rez mechanichs or to pull perfect answers generated by rng? Hm yes, ticktacus should stay the same. 

    Everyone can see that 6 cost card with 8/8 stats that burns off half of opponents deck is ridiculously OP. It gets even more ridiculously OP when you compare the card to other classes legendary card choices: they have nothing even remotely similar. But I guess you own the damn card and thus are eagerly defending it.

     Bro youre a priest player. Priest is the reason I put tickatus in my deck. Me spending all my resources to clear a board you can bring back with one card the very next turn? Tickatus is a counter/tech to that style of deck.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 2

    posted a message on obvious case of RNG manipulation

    Lol 

    Posted in: Mage
  • 1

    posted a message on Control is dead because...
    Quote from Neko615 >>

    Tf is wrong in this thread? This guy is like “I play homebrew! I’m original not like you stupid fucks”

    like what? You get that your putting yourself above other people. What kind of shit attitude is that? How uneducated can you be to think you’re better than other people and what makes this even worse, people you’ve never met or actually talked too. Lmao

     The guy felt I was personally attacking him bc I play tickatus and proceeded to call me brain dead. I then started to reply back to which it got side tracked into a different conversation. Perhaps read the actual thread before making comments on the thread? And ya if you play rez priest or secret mage, I think i’m better than you, I think a lot of people are better than you.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Control is dead because...
    Quote from fabjx >>
    Quote from Popeye123 >>
    Quote from fabjx >>
    Quote from Popeye123 >>
    Quote from fabjx >>

    As if Tickatus wasn't total braindead too. And the way you think is as well. Control decks designed to destroy other control decks is an idiotic concept. It is like cannibalizing control so that aggro can break free undisturbed. Retardedness at its finest

    I already explained how tickatus is more of an anti-combo card than an anti-control card, which is what it is supposed to be. Control is weak against combo decks so tickatus answers that problem perfectly. But again, I explained this in my earlier post so I guess youre brain dead while reading, as well as while playing hearthstone decks you copied and pasted from google.

     Sure because your Tickatus is not copy-paste. It is sooo original. Nobody plays it... Please STFU

     Bro i’m talking about your copy and pasted deck that you got from hsreplay. I play specifically homebrews, A. Because it’s more fun to actually put thought into your own decks not to mention more rewarding, and B. Because it’s more fun than playing every other overplayed, washed out, bs that people hop on like rez priest, secret mage, kb rogue, and all of demon hunter.

    Tickatus goes in my homebrew to make you uncreative f**ks that play these decks cry and hopefully uninstall the game. So you please stfu and keep playing your gay ass rez priest. I hope I come across you on ladder and tickatus 10 of your cards. In fact, i’m gonna start making a deck right now with just tickatus, a 9 mana card, and yshaarj so I can tickatus you, raise dead, tickatus you again, raise dead, tickatus you again, and then yshaarj and tickatus you again. Thanks for the inspiration.

    Hahahahaha. First of all you don't even know what I play. I don't even play priest so wrong try again. Who plays rez priest in 2021? It is not even in the meta. What ladder do you play on? The scrubs' one?

    Second, homebrew my big ass. You can maybe change 3 or 4 cards but the staple ones are the same for everyone who wants to play Tickatus. I really want to see how original your homebrew is. I'm in for some fat laugh. 

    I play my own quest shaman, that nobody else plays. This is homebrew. Not Tickatus BS that before the meta went all aggro because of it, everyone and their grandmas were playing. Don't make me laugh really

     Alright you obviously play standard and not wild because rez priest is extremely prevalent in wild. Big priest, rez priest same thing. And bro my deck literally has the new yshaarj the old nzoth and both yoggs like how much more original to you want me to get while still at least being a little bit viable. Maybe my zoo warlock deck with renounce darkness and lorewalker cho is original enough? I dont play anything meta bro, like anything. So no I dont switch around 3 or 4 cards, I think of fun stuff to do and start from scratch. And the scrubs ladder? I’ve hit legend enough times to know i’m not a scrub and with my own decks too. 

    You sound like a scrub though if a card like tickatus is ruining your day enough to post about it

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Control is dead because...
    Quote from Wokitiki >>

    Tickatus is my new best friend. Best craft ever <3

     Yessir, got him as my level 25 :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.