• 0

    posted a message on New Druid Legendary Minion Revealed - Ysera Unleashed

    Lorewise, Alex was once imprisoned by orcish warlock and served the horde. 

    Gameplay wise, I think each explorer class gets a "good" dragon. Hunter is the only explorer class left for Alex. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Common Neutral Minion Revealed - Devoted Maniac

    Grim Necromancer and Hench-Clan Hag are both similar cards which summon 1/1 minions. Both of them cost 4 mana and Hag is still in Standard.

    Sure, both of them have slightly higher stats, but this one has rush and invoke counter. I will say the cost is justifiable else it will be over creep.

    Furthermore, Quest Shaman is still active. If Shaman's invoke is good, trigger twice may be op

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Common Neutral Minion Revealed - Devoted Maniac
    Quote from Kill_Dash_Nine >>

    If it was 2 mana it might be playable. For the mana cost and stats too much of a tempo loss to justify the battlecry.

     After explanation, people still failed to understand how invoke works. 

    In a warlock, this is a 2/2 rush and summon 2 1/1 minions. Plus, it adds to invoke counter which makes your future Gala stronger and triggers those "if invoke" cards.

    All these for just 2 mana? 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Now Twitch viewers are getting censored?

    When I said it is fine, I meant it is fine if Blizzard bans comments from both sides. I did not mean it is fine with what's happening with hk right now.

    Seriously what did you guys expect Blizzard to do? Ban one side alone is obviously wrong. Do nothing and people will point fingers that they ate their own words when they claimed political neutral stand. Ban both sides and still people have things to complain.

    Politics should be separated from gaming. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Now Twitch viewers are getting censored?

    If you read the article though, it is not just "free hk". Anything pro China also gets deleted. The article title is misleading.

    If Blizzard removes both pro hk and pro China comments, that's fine. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Rank Floors Make Winning Games Impossible

    You can always do your quests in tavern brawl or arena... Else just reroll the quest if you seriously cannot win with that class...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Wrapped Golem's spawned Scarab

    Wrapped Golem has been around for months. Just wondering why does its Scarab always spawn to the far right, rather than just beside it similar to other cards like Hogger.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Nerf Stats on Game-changing Vanilla Statted Minions!!

    All of them are class cards. Class cards are known and acceptable to be better than neutral ones.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 4x Basic Cards?!

     

    Anybody with a lvl 60 character would have 4 copies of basic cards. 2 plain, 2 gold. How's that a bug?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blitzchung kicked out of grandmasters and banned from competitive play

    Well, the guy did the right thing at a wrong place.

    The consequences were clearly stated in the tournament rules, ban + removal of prize money earned. He knew the consequences, yet he chose to go ahead with his actions. If Blizzard chose to close one eye, others will take this as a precedent case and makes all sorts of political/ racist comments. Blizzard chose to follow the tournament rules and gave him the exact consequences stated, yet it results in an uproar. Either way it is a lose situation for Blizzard.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction
    Quote from uvito >>
    Quote from KingCarnage >>

    Sac Pact should have never worked on a hero in the first place. That's just stupid and an obscene way for rogues to beat warlock.

     Jaraxxus is not a Hero, is a Minion, and you play as Minion when you use him.

    Remember his battlecry: Destroy your Hero and replace It with Lord Jaraxxus.

     Once the battlecry triggers, he is a hero. Cards like Mind Blast will damage him. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction

    Minions only spells such as Starfall or Siphon Soul do not affect Jar when he is a hero. Demon effect cards such as Demonfuse or Light's Champion do not affect Jar as well.

    Why should Sac Pact be an exception.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction
    Quote from FortyDust >>
    Quote from Platy >>
    Quote from FortyDust >>
    Quote from Zion7 >>

    They should remove the interaction period, it never should have existed in the first place for so many reasons. It's highly inconsistent with the way spells work in this game. Since when would a minion target spell work on somebodies hero? I get they it was for lolz originally but in all seriousness it's wrong. I don't care what your opinion is of Jaxx as far as viability in the meta, the point stands.

     Nowhere in the text of Sacrificial Pact will you find the word "minion."

    It targets a Demon. Jaraxxus is a Demon.

    If anything, we should be hearing more complaints about Hungry Crab not killing Morgl. I would love to see that fixed.

     Light's champion silences a demon, yet it cannot target Jar. Malganis boosts demon health, but Jar remains at 15. Neither of them specified minions only.

     Silence, as a mechanic, is not defined for heroes. What would that even do, exactly?

    But now that you mention it, I would totally be in favor of letting Mal'Ganis buff your Attack and Health. We should ask for that change. It would make Jaraxxus more playable!

     If Jar was frozen, silence would be good to let him attack

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction
    Quote from FortyDust >>
    Quote from Zion7 >>

    They should remove the interaction period, it never should have existed in the first place for so many reasons. It's highly inconsistent with the way spells work in this game. Since when would a minion target spell work on somebodies hero? I get they it was for lolz originally but in all seriousness it's wrong. I don't care what your opinion is of Jaxx as far as viability in the meta, the point stands.

     Nowhere in the text of Sacrificial Pact will you find the word "minion."

    It targets a Demon. Jaraxxus is a Demon.

    If anything, we should be hearing more complaints about Hungry Crab not killing Morgl. I would love to see that fixed.

     Light's champion silences a demon, yet it cannot target Jar. Malganis boosts demon health, but Jar remains at 15. Neither of them specified minions only.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Its time to remove the Jaraxxus + Sac Pact interaction
    Quote from YouSayBooyah >>
    Quote from KingCarnage >>

    Sac Pact should have never worked on a hero in the first place. That's just stupid and an obscene way for rogues to beat warlock.

     Thing is, its not a hero card. Its a battlecry minion. 

     If it was pulled out via dirty rat or other means, I agree it is a minion and sac pact should work. Once the battlecry triggers, that character is a hero, which cannot be targeted by minion only spells like siphon soul. Why should sac pact be an exception

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.