Hearthpwn

Quote from DMH_Meta >>

Quote from Phaedros >>

Quote from 0lafBiggles >>

I see the value in both DDMMYY and YYMMDD. But MMDDYY is a complete mystery to me.

 mmddyy is the most logical one. You know what month it is then day then year. You wouldn't it's  59:2 o'clock would you 

 i almost choked in such stupid argument. i dont care about how ppl use it but saying its more logical is crazy. ORDER is and always will be more logical hence increasing the "size" IS the logical path. So first the small one which is DAY then the middle one which is MONTH and finally the bigger one which is YEAR.

Dont bother replying with some frivoulous fantasy argument you might cook up. Either way I will grab some popcorns just in case you decide on pursuing such ludicrous endeavour

 explain time then. Is it logical to say 59:2 o'clock? No it isn't 

Edit nvm 

Quote from Healingpower >>

Quote from Phaedros >>

Quote from NightCrawl3r>>

• Shudderwok skips battlecries of silenced minions if they are still on the battlefield
• Transforming all elementals played last turn disables elemental synergy
• Transforming a non-elemental played last turn into an elemental enables elemental synergy (only works if transformed the turn after it's play 

 

   These changes make no sense.

 These are not "changes", but bugs. And yes, it sucks for Frozen and everyone who submitted a "nerfed" deck. 

 Oh whoops thanks lol. I read too fast 

Quote from NightCrawl3r>>

• Shudderwok skips battlecries of silenced minions if they are still on the battlefield
• Transforming all elementals played last turn disables elemental synergy
• Transforming a non-elemental played last turn into an elemental enables elemental synergy (only works if transformed the turn after it's play 

   These changes make no sense.

Edit : nevermind

Quote from Kaladin >>

This affects a very small number of Tess games.  The Yogg nerf affected all Yogg games.  Huge difference. 

 I think you said this before. Doesn't really matter though. A nerf is a nerf.

I know people are ragging on this post but I would like to thank you for writing it as it is at least partially responsible for getting a response from blizzard.

Quote from Leaga >>

Right. It's an editorial. Thats pretty much what I said when I said it was an opinion. Thats the definition of an editorial: an opinion piece written by the editors. Aka, not news.

Editorials in papers commonly have their own page for a reason. If the site wants to have an editorial, blog, etc type section on the front page for this kind of content then that's great, they should do that. But you want clear delineations between opinions and news if you're going to be useful as a news outlet.  Mixing editorials into the news feed doesn't seem like a way to create clear delineations between the two.

My point is that the news section has not been bogged down with editorials such as this in the past and if it is in the future then I will no longer be a frequent user.  

 The point is they don't have a separate section for it and that's fine.

Quote from Leaga >>

The fact that community drama like this is in "news" makes me lose a lot of respect for this site. This is not news. This is an opinion that should have been posted in the forums. I agree with the points made and think this is one of the stupidest mis-steps that Blizzard has ever made but if garbage like this will be showing up in the news section then I will stop using this site for my hearthstone news. An admin having an opinion on community drama is not news.

 it's an editorial 

Quote from Infirc >>

TBh is a matter of power level, i think shudderwock not getting a refund was fine because the power level of the card barely changes (if it changes at all) with the change, Tess however is a much worse card after the nerf and the gap of the power level from the "before and the "after" is super noticeable. and If Lynessa is a random order now it means she can Backstab (in case you got her  or the spell with a random effect)/ Hammer of Wrath herself as a 1/1 in case you used a spell to kill your own minions before she can buff herself,which also reduces her power level significantly (although not as much as Tess's Power level reduction)

 Why should it depend on power level? A change is a change.

Quote from hofaho >>

Fuck the hearthstone team. They said they would not change it before...

FUCK HEARTHSTONE TEAM. Really.

I am really disappointed

 To me it shows how disgustingly greedy they are.

Quote from Kaladin >>

No, I'm upset that you all think it's a nerf, when it's most definitely not, though like I stated, I could see how some could view it that way.  And to reiterate, I'd like to think Blizzard has more integrity than to bow to the whims of the community because they think they deserve stuff for free. 

 integrity? Do you know what that word means? It's a nerf. Integrity would be to offer dust for the card and call it a nerf. They are straight up lying, which is the opposite of integrity.

If call to arms said recruit 1 then recruit 1 then recruit another it would make more sense that these abilities would trigger depending on the order they are recruited. To me, though, it doesn't really make sense that knife juggler or tidecaller even activate at all since they are being recruited at the same time.

How is it randomly generated? Does it number all the cards and then.....something lol 

Does anyone know how shuffling is simulated in hearthstone? If so how does it work?