Hearthpwn

Quote from TundrazZ >>

Icehowl and charged devilsaur too, but honestly who gives a dam?

Quote from Infirc >>

ohhh i thought you were tlaking about the mechanic, but you're talking about the card, anyways, the mechanic also has to be reworked

for more information look in here:https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/77139-charge-the-mechanic-should-be-nerfed?page=9

Correct me if im wrong, but shouldnt the card "Charge" be reworded as "Give a friendly minion Rush this turn" Cause giving a minion with Charge but it cant attack the hero.....is Rush. We know the card wont see play but its still worth correcting the issue. 

If there is one thing i hate about gaming in general is fake modesty. You are always told to be a good sport, but the problem is the people that tell you that are the assholes in the winning position. This is basically in any game you play where you win or lose; The normal thing that happens is that the winning player always Emotes or says Good game cause its just human nature to boast. The thing i hate about hearthstone is 2 things.

1. I hate when im playing a deck that isnt normally netdecked and i get "wow" emoted at the start of the game or when i play a card that they probably never seen before. 

2. When your opponent Bm emotes you by saying "Well played"; which basically tranlates into 2 things. "im telling you i have lethal and/or I have lethal on you and im congratulating myself"

Quote from Davaretta >>

3. Call to Arms - This card is basically what has put paladin where it is. I think making it 5 mana will balance it to the fact it puts 6 mana on minions into play and gives you the board.

No it hasn't, Baku Paladin is the most popular Pally deck right now and it doesn't run it.

Putting it at 5 mana basically removes it completely from the Genn Paladin lineup and gives it to Baku Pally. Baku Pally won't play it because summoning 3 1-drops is awful. So the card will only be available to ''regular'' Paladins and Murloc Pallies.

This doesn't fix Paladin, it will just kill Genn Paladin without touching his Baku sister and be a minor nerf to the other Paladin decks. It would be a slap in the face to anyone who crafted Genn Greymane. What the fuck will we play then. Even Shaman?

 

Quote from FTPhack >>

Hmmmm... nerf 3 cards that empower 4-5 different decks. Nah, no need, just tech against them... thats what silence, removal, aoe is for. 

So i know threads like these happen all the time, but i just wanted to express the 3 cards i think should be nerfed just allow the meta to become alot more open and make it alot more interesting . So lets look at what is basically the meta. the Decks that most people netdeck are Spiteful priest/druid, Aggro Paladin and Cubelock. Paladin seems fine but i think they should fix it also so here are the cards think they should change.

1, Lackey - We all underrated this card....but i feel this card is why Cubelock as good as it is. Cheating out a doomguard and Voidlord is basically game over against alot of decks if you cant answer them.  I suggest you change the text of the card to say something like " Draw a demon from your deck" or make it 6 mana to prevent it from coming down early.

2. Spiteful Summoner - Blizzard has nerfed cards because they arent fun to play against and this card falls under that. The other thing people dont realize is that Spiteful pretty much makes it so blizzard cant make any big spells because this card exists. I suggest that they make the Card 1 mana higher. generally decks that spiteful are in are minion heavy decks so its more or less a Win more card.

3. Call to Arms - This card is basically what has put paladin where it is. I think making it 5 mana will balance it to the fact it puts 6 mana on minions into play and gives you the board. 

Battletag: PeteMD #1300

Region: NA

Trade only: Yeah, you go first

DONE

Quote from flutterguy2017 >>

people just dont like to lose. 

Ive been thinking lately, The problem with Hearthstone as a whole is basically the players themselves. Now i know youre thinking that its more of the game itself. but I think there is something when it comes to player behavior and mindset. Now what am i referring to?  

1. Netdecks and "tier" lists - This is the #1 issue i have with the community as a whole where alot of players basically stop trying to build decks of their own but instead they only focus on what is considered "good". This also leads to the point of players make up tier lists because basically all a Tier list is basically what is the best deck to netdeck. I cant imagine when you play a game you can play on your phone you would be only focused on what people consider good and what deck you want to build.

2. Casual Mode Tryhards - This is one of the big problems i have with playing hearthstone because basically Ranked and Casual mode are not different in anyway.  The players that linger in this playmode are pretty Deplorable if youre playing an established deck like Cubelock or Aggro paladin. what blows my mind even more is that you have people who are ranked 10-5 who are playing Casual with netdecks and thats just not okay because if youre netdecking, you might as well be playing Ranked to begin with. 

3. Esports and competitive - basically this goes with the 1st point, but i think the reason people play hearthstone too seriously is because Esports has a small roll in what streamers play. I remember when i use to play MTG, Pro tours did have netdecks, but there are decks where they were different because players liked to play decks that were fun even if they werent always going to win, but sometimes they do cause of the pilot. 

i know im gonna get Flamed for this cause I know how some people are when it comes to touchy subjects that deal with judging someone. 

hey guys

So i wanted to just state why the so called "tier" list is basically just an illusion created by people who feel the need to justify their actions. Now before  i get to my point, ive been playing Trading card games ever since High school on things like Yugioh, Pokemon ( yes lol) and Magic the gathering for over 10 years and i can generally understand concepts of what is what when it comes to play styles. Ive noticed for the past year and half that netdecking has become basically the norm and its pretty much accepted because its all about winning at all costs. Ive been playing hearthstone ever since launch and i can tell you for sure that for the past year there has never been a faster settling meta then ive seen. Now is it wrong to play a deck because you are more likely to win? obviously you would want to pick something is more appealing. Like you wouldnt play IronBark Protector over the lich king because its not even up for debate. The issue at hand, Its a very tribal time where basically anything that isnt the norm is overlooked or just dismissed because of impressions.

Too often in Card reviews are basically reviewed in 2 scopes....1 is it a good card? and 2 does it fit in a Tier 1 deck?  The issue is that streamers that review cards only praise a card if it doesnt meet both standards. This is where card reviews are just flat out wrong most of the time and its basically off of laziness; No its not that their thinking about the card itself...but its more of  if the card in question can exist in a meta that already set. I remember there was a card review Trump did with Ungoro where he basically rated every single priest card crap because priest wasnt a good class. Trump is basically the embodiment of what the  normal perception of a player is. 

So what makes a deck "tier 1"? thats the main topic at hand. Ive played in many meta in Magic the gathering and in hearthstone as well and to me it basically comes down to 2 factors. 1, can the deck get to its end point of winning the game constantly? 2. Can the deck in question help you get out of problems you would have to figure out? Now i know youre gonna say..."thats like what Cubelock or spiteful does and thats why their tier 1". To me i believe any deck with a group of a good cards can be a vessel of getting wins,It doesnt have to be flashy either. What most people dont understand is that deck building correctly can make all the difference. Obviously if you build something with Big Game hunter you will not do as well against decks with small minions.. but that is where you learn,but the issue is that the part of learning how to make something better isnt there cause most people only care about what on top; This is a result of why metas become more stall quickly. A few years ago in hearthstone normally one or two decks would be the most common deck on ladder and you knew who the target was. You could build your deck against something like face hunter and generally be okay. The problem is now there is about 3 or 4 decks that are popular and that creates a bad game of rock paper scissors, but really its just rocks pounding rocks.

I know this topic is probably gonna poorly by those who are spike and think they know everything. But i feel like we are going into same pattern only because we dont learn from mistake of looking at cards and decks for what they could be,  

Quote from Pivosh >>

Cubelock.

Baku Warrior is so good that ive had 4 hunters instaconcede . 

Control Warrior is wayyyy more fun than Quest Warrior.