As expensive as it is to unlock everything in Battlefront 2 , i´m pretty sure that to get everything in Hearthstone you would have to spend an equal or even greater amount of money and time. I suggest we start a boycott and simply stop buying packs with real money until Blizzard changes their predatory practices in what is supposed to be a game for teens-kids. Join me if you feel the same.
Why do you feel that you should be able to get everything without great effort, time, and/or money?
Being able to play the game vs being able to play competitively vs being able to have everything are all very different things.
when did I say that i wanted to get everything without doing anything? why do people only read the title of a thread before commenting? , the discussion has advanced!
Actually I read the title and the OP. I have stuff to do other than read through each individual's comments in the thread. You may not have explicitly stated that you want it for nothing, but you implied that you shouldn't have to spend large amounts of time and money to get everything in HS.
Is it such a sin to expect full access to a game's contest for a sensible amount of money in 2017?. Look at people like Kripp that have bought thousands upon thousands of packs and dont even have a full golden collection. It's not like I'm a full-free to play enthusiast. I just think things could be better with a different pay model.
It's not about being able to play competitive is about stopping or at least mitigating practices that encourage gabmbling in children's games such as lootboxes.
Actually, the competitive part is far more of an issue, even a whiff of pay-to-win is a big design problem that puts off more casual players in favour of spending 'whales'. In the long run it can alienate a mass market player base in preference of a small number of highly-profitable players.
Hearthstone doesn't really have that problem, most people with minimal spend can build highly competitive decks.
Plus in Europe at least BF2 has a PEGI 16 rating so the old/tired 'won't someone think of the children' argument is pretty weak.
I'm editor of the UK's trade magazine for the games industry, so you could argue I'm pro-industry but I still think there's clear lines between BF2 and HS.
Because age ratings always stop people below the required age from buying that product. Look at Hs's art, dialogues and general style, its clearly meant to be marketed towards children or at least young teens.
I don't see that at all to be honest, it's light and fun in the main, but it's inline with all Blizzard's stuff. And it appeals to me and I'm on my forties.
Yes, games get into younger hands, but parents who let their kids run riot with their credit cards really should know better. Please let's move away from this old-fashioned Eighties-Nineties 'games are for kids' style moralising.
Cases where games " caused" violent acts are relatively sparse and can be attributed to mental illness or other factors while every other week I see a case of a kid spending thousands of dollars in an online game with lootboxes or similar stuff. It's not even that I care sooooooooooo much about the kids I just think it would be nice if the chances of getting cards of higher rarities in packs increased, for example.
As expensive as it is to unlock everything in Battlefront 2 , i´m pretty sure that to get everything in Hearthstone you would have to spend an equal or even greater amount of money and time. I suggest we start a boycott and simply stop buying packs with real money until Blizzard changes their predatory practices in what is supposed to be a game for teens-kids. Join me if you feel the same.
Why do you feel that you should be able to get everything without great effort, time, and/or money?
Being able to play the game vs being able to play competitively vs being able to have everything are all very different things.
when did I say that i wanted to get everything without doing anything? why do people only read the title of a thread before commenting? , the discussion has advanced!
It's not about being able to play competitive is about stopping or at least mitigating practices that encourage gabmbling in children's games such as lootboxes.
Actually, the competitive part is far more of an issue, even a whiff of pay-to-win is a big design problem that puts off more casual players in favour of spending 'whales'. In the long run it can alienate a mass market player base in preference of a small number of highly-profitable players.
Hearthstone doesn't really have that problem, most people with minimal spend can build highly competitive decks.
Plus in Europe at least BF2 has a PEGI 16 rating so the old/tired 'won't someone think of the children' argument is pretty weak.
I'm editor of the UK's trade magazine for the games industry, so you could argue I'm pro-industry but I still think there's clear lines between BF2 and HS.
Because age ratings always stop people below the required age from buying that product. Look at Hs's art, dialogues and general style, its clearly meant to be marketed towards children or at least young teens.
Would it hurt them too much if theygave you every card in an expansion for 80 bucks? im not against them making money im against predatory practices that encourage people to spend ludicrous amounts of money in games
It's not about being able to play competitive is about stopping or at least mitigating practices that encourage gabmbling in children's games such as lootboxes.
As expensive as it is to unlock everything in Battlefront 2 , i´m pretty sure that to get everything in Hearthstone you would have to spend an equal or even greater amount of money and time. I suggest we start a boycott and simply stop buying packs with real money until Blizzard changes their predatory practices in what is supposed to be a game for teens-kids. Join me if you feel the same.
- Asume that the only destroyed weapon was a legendary one
- Play your weapon( since apparently the deck is based around the legensdary weapon you need to get it out asap)
- All currently revealed weapons are more than 5 mana ( except Anduin's but good luck casting 3 spells with 4 mana left, and Malfurion which if already destroyed is useless to equip again)
- Your turn is over in the best case scenario of having 10 mana to play both this guy and the weapon. You have a 1/3 on board.
I guess if the game slows down to a crawl it will be good, or if weapons turn out to be so great that you have to run 1 of these as some anti-ooze tech
1
0
0
0
1
Would it hurt them too much if theygave you every card in an expansion for 80 bucks? im not against them making money im against predatory practices that encourage people to spend ludicrous amounts of money in games
1
It's not about being able to play competitive is about stopping or at least mitigating practices that encourage gabmbling in children's games such as lootboxes.
5
As expensive as it is to unlock everything in Battlefront 2 , i´m pretty sure that to get everything in Hearthstone you would have to spend an equal or even greater amount of money and time. I suggest we start a boycott and simply stop buying packs with real money until Blizzard changes their predatory practices in what is supposed to be a game for teens-kids. Join me if you feel the same.
1
Is it early prediction season already? Hang on Let me name a few threads that will pop up in the following days:
- This will be the worst expansion ever
- This will be the best expansion ever
-Will discardlock be viable in Kobolds?
- Legendary X will be in every deck
- we will have a control meta
- Branch of the world tree will break the game ( lol not)
0
Im super glad, the class was far to dominant for far too long.
2
Ultimate Infestation
-3
I tought the problem with Arena was having egyptian-god level cards like Bonemare and Flappy Bird as commons and rares?
-2
-play this guy (3 mana)
- Asume that the only destroyed weapon was a legendary one
- Play your weapon( since apparently the deck is based around the legensdary weapon you need to get it out asap)
- All currently revealed weapons are more than 5 mana ( except Anduin's but good luck casting 3 spells with 4 mana left, and Malfurion which if already destroyed is useless to equip again)
- Your turn is over in the best case scenario of having 10 mana to play both this guy and the weapon. You have a 1/3 on board.
I guess if the game slows down to a crawl it will be good, or if weapons turn out to be so great that you have to run 1 of these as some anti-ooze tech
0
How long can this go go
1
Nice finisher for Midrange
1
This card could be a sleeper