Hearthpwn

Lightbomb will destroy them all.

Quote from StoutYeoman >>

Quote from s2mikey >>

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Meet 4 shaman cunts in a row, fine, I'll switch to freeze mage and get 'em.

2 control warriors in a row -,-

 This is exactly why I dont bother doing that anymore.  Just play whatever deck you enjoy and if you lose, you lose.  It aint you thats losing - its your deck.  Why?  Because its not optimized to beat all the usual cancer shit like Shaman/Huntard.  Once I embraced that losses are simply bad matchups due to the "sheeple" mentality of the meta, my frsutrations went away.  Mostly.

 Maybe matchmaking is set up to punish players who switch decks while laddering? 

4 savage roar at one turn like a fucking joke.

İs it possible that we lost all of our dust and gold with release of new expansion ? I just read the newspaper it was saying too much about dust and gold 

write talansbar in chat

it will be an adventure right. All of the adventures are kind of dungeons. So it might be Dead mines.

Right now I have 9 win 0 defeat with Priest in Shiftcon tavern brawl I don't need to hold Shifter Zerus at my hand I am playing for value

Quote from finniggann >>

if 13 people and only thirteen play the heroic brawl, then one person will get around 14000 gold worth of value of rewards if I understood correctly, that is more than the value put in by those thirteen people of 13000 gold and there is several thousand more gold worht of rewards across the other 12 people. that is assuming each has one loss, but they have three so those 12 people remaing do this again for and then the 11 do it again and then if I did my math right everyone is out by winnign twelve or losing 3. now when more people play that value is diluted, and the ratio of winners to losers is gonna be lower but I think that since my scenario has over three times the winnngs as the payings, because 3 got 12 wins, then the overall gold value winnings across n number of people paying 1000n to get in should be greater than 1000n by a factor of at least 2. that is an estimate but even if in total n people made exactly their money back if the winnigns were split evenly then blizzard is not stealing gold or whatever you said. and that scenario is so unlikely because it requires everyone be equally bad at the mode and there to be an infinite stream of people steadily replacing anyone who loses or gets 12 wins. basically any one person most likely should not play the heroic brawl because the majority of people will lose huge amounts of money, but as a whole the population of the brawl will probably make money. 

 

Quote from Das_King >>

All these dense people not understanding the maths and thinking it's ok just because you can choose not to participate..

LET ME TELL YOU OP'S POINT STRAIGHT.

Any match (usually) results in someone's win and someone's loss. At the end of the week there will be an equal number of wins and loses. Therefore it is easy to calculate the total sum of rewards NO MATTER HOW MANY PLAYERS THERE ARE AND IF YOU DECIDE TO BUY IT OR NOT. The total sum of rewards GIVEN BY BLIZZARD TO ALL TOURNAMENT PLAYERS WORLDWIDE is only 70% of THE AMOUNT OF GOLD/MONEY PEOPLE ACTUALLY PUT INTO THIS AS ENTRANCE FEES. Unlike other modes such as arena, where the total rewards equal to 100% of the total money given by people as entrance fees. OP's point is, this tournament's reward rate is TOO LOW compared to other HS modes and other worldwide tournaments unrelated to HS.

This thread is not bitching about deciding to enter or not. It's about Blizzard being unfair with a never-seen-before too low return rate.

Guys as a f2p player I prefer to open 10 packs for 1000 gold and I don't care if they make this new mode since I am not going to participate. Everybody is going to use meta decks and most winning deck will be bashed by paying /high end community until Blizzard is forced to balance cards and it is good for me I will have more chance to raise my rank in long term. If 3-3 result would give me 10 packs I would participate it for fun cuz I would lose nothing by participating. This is not a mode for free players who cannot afford to create meta decks of every week most likely high end players who already collected most of the useful cards and have bunch of gold to burn.

Ragnaros gives harm at turn 8 Medivh gives harm at turn 9 it is a little slow for Hunter.

Quote from GhostSerpent >>

What do you think I can replace best princess huhuroan with?

Quote from emme27 >>

So, my first legendary card was Cenarius. That's fine, I don't really like Druid..and I would prefer a neutral card, but that's fine.

Then my second legendary card was Cenarius. Oh c'mon. I mean, there are more than 30 classic legendaries, I have just one, and is it Cenarius AGAIN?? ..but what can I do, at least I got 400 dust. Fine.

Then I got Alexstrasza, and I was like "oh, not bad, the circle of bad luck is broken!".. (although I never really use it, but still..)
..and then I got Nat Pagle..
..and then I got Captain Greenskin
and then I got Millhouse Manastorm..
AND THEN I GOT Nozdormu

So at that point, after the anger, I was like "ok, WHAT CAN BE WORSE? It will be better now on, I just got all the ugly ones and now it will be better!"

AND THEN TODAY I GOT
THE
THIRD
CENARIUS
THE THIRD FUCKING CENARIUS
THE THIRD FUCKING CENARIUS.

SO FUCK OFF HEARTHSTONE, FUCK OFF
WHY DO YOU HATE ME?????

Quote from Trigger1985 >>

Thx, nice deck!

But i have big trobles agains paladins. Becouse they have many healing oportuninies Ivory Knight  Forbidden Healing Truesilver Champion Ragnaros, Lightlord. Give me some advice pls.

Community tends to create working decks if the meta consist of only aggro decks that creates domino effect and all players starts to play aggro decks. So it is nothing to do with community.