Keep brawl. I also agree with the control board. I think its the most important part of the match up. Antonidas will be the most annoying thing i can't imagine especially when they use a spare part to stealth it.
What i would suggest with this deck to those questioning the traps is to take the deck test it and adapt to the meta. Obviously if this meta is aggro you can take out a trap and add a explosive. That's exactly what I did with this deck. I feel alot of players do this in general by taking someone elses deck and change 1 or 2 cards to adapt to your play style.
So i saw strifecro run a deck some what the same to this but I didn't have the cards he did for the deck he was running so i improvised. I am currently rank 11 and feel my biggest weakness if Handlock/Demon Lock. I think paladin has given me some trouble.
The reason i play archmage is for the spare parts from my opponent or if not all of my secrets are out at that point. I was wondering if anyone else had some sort of improvement i could make.
I have seen a few decks with it however majority of the decks don't have this card. I look at the 3/4 for three mana and i get their is nothing else that comes with it but isn't that alone worth it?
Loatheb doesn't need to be reduced. I think its a balanced. It was ment to be a game changer and thats exactly what it is. I guess if you want to do a 5-4 maybe thats okay but i think its fine
Yes most decks nowadays are rush however you can still have a control deck and be relevant. Shamans as well run a very burst deck and have answers for rush decks as well.
I do agree that GvG will help contain these rush decks much better than the decks now but to say that its nothing but rush isn't necessarily to.
I thought antonidas (dont care about the spelling) at first wasn't really something until freeze mage became popular again. Although the legendary may not be worth much now im sure someone will have a deck that includes it and it works well
What they have done about the hunter issue is to not allow people to just go face with their cards. Their are so many new cards that some people may have in their deck that could possibly change the game. I think the trades that hunter players might have to make now will easily reduce the win percentage of hunter.
0
Keep brawl. I also agree with the control board. I think its the most important part of the match up. Antonidas will be the most annoying thing i can't imagine especially when they use a spare part to stealth it.
2
What i would suggest with this deck to those questioning the traps is to take the deck test it and adapt to the meta. Obviously if this meta is aggro you can take out a trap and add a explosive. That's exactly what I did with this deck. I feel alot of players do this in general by taking someone elses deck and change 1 or 2 cards to adapt to your play style.
0
I compare this game too a playstation or xbox. Games cost 60$ so when a new expansion comes out i just put 60 in and call it a day
0
So i saw strifecro run a deck some what the same to this but I didn't have the cards he did for the deck he was running so i improvised. I am currently rank 11 and feel my biggest weakness if Handlock/Demon Lock. I think paladin has given me some trouble.
The reason i play archmage is for the spare parts from my opponent or if not all of my secrets are out at that point. I was wondering if anyone else had some sort of improvement i could make.
Battle.net name: NickkaJ#1995
0
Unstable Portal
0
Dr Boom is fun
0
hey chemical can you add me on HS NickkaJ#1995 would like to tlak about the deck
0
Went 12-1 with a mage deck with 2 chugga chugga's and 2 water ele's but found it much more difficult vs them because of the spells they use.
1
I have seen a few decks with it however majority of the decks don't have this card. I look at the 3/4 for three mana and i get their is nothing else that comes with it but isn't that alone worth it?
2
Loatheb doesn't need to be reduced. I think its a balanced. It was ment to be a game changer and thats exactly what it is. I guess if you want to do a 5-4 maybe thats okay but i think its fine
0
Yes most decks nowadays are rush however you can still have a control deck and be relevant. Shamans as well run a very burst deck and have answers for rush decks as well.
I do agree that GvG will help contain these rush decks much better than the decks now but to say that its nothing but rush isn't necessarily to.
0
Had Hogger but did disenchant to get Ysera however I wouldn't change a thing but Hogger looks fun to play
0
They can't give us all quality cards even MTG doesn't do that lol
0
I thought antonidas (dont care about the spelling) at first wasn't really something until freeze mage became popular again. Although the legendary may not be worth much now im sure someone will have a deck that includes it and it works well
1
What they have done about the hunter issue is to not allow people to just go face with their cards. Their are so many new cards that some people may have in their deck that could possibly change the game. I think the trades that hunter players might have to make now will easily reduce the win percentage of hunter.