It's good. Don't get why people saying broken...its on par with rag or tirion
Ragnaros is very good, he can kill a huge minion or do heavy damage in turn he played, Tirion is a excelent defense tool.
This new legendary trumps the two very good legendarys because you can choose what you need in that moment.
Opponent trying to burst spells in your face? Heal 12 and 2 Fireballs are the effect countered.
Opponent have the board control? Give damage to all killing the smallers and damage the biggers.
Opponent trying to last long enough to make a "I win" combo turn? Give damage in face to set lethal in the next turn.
Both players are playing control and the board is empty? Fill your board with only one card.
In this kind of game versatility is a huge advantage.
2
He isn't a card that sees any play, but I know that he did show up in StrifeCro's potential Krul Warlock list if the meta becomes more Jade-heavy.
The idea is that he is good for Krul the Unshackled in the same way that Infested Tauren is good for N'Zoth, the Corruptor. It allows you to play the card defensively, blocking an attacker that might otherwise prevent you from using it.
Again, this is simply theoretical on StrifeCro's part and I'm not sure I would necessarily keep it just for that reason. But it does show that sometimes old cards can be potentially revisited in the future.
2
Again, none of the counters are 100%. It is, after all, a very good Tier 1 deck. But Aggro Shaman had the same damage potential AND multiple powerful class minions AND higher value AND wasn't countered by weapon removal AND had Maelstrom Portal to counter other aggressive decks AND high spell damage to bypass taunts. It was better than Pirate Warrior in nearly every conceivable way except it was harder to play, which meant it took more practice to get those better results.
So it isn't a failure of the nerfs that Pirate Warrior is still around. It will be a failure of the nerfs if Aggro Shaman is still as successful as it was before.
6
3
@Hoothout Okay, now if you will permit me the same courtesy I want to express as clearly as possible my own position.
First, Blizzard's job is to maximize the enjoyment of the game for the most amount of people over a long period of time. They will certainly try to support many different types of players, but sometimes it is not possible to support them all at once. It is as the saying goes: “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time."
Second, I would argue (in agreement with Blizzard) that the keys to generating enjoyment are variety and interactivity. It is important that players experience a variety of games, and that these games involve an active struggle between the two decks for supremacy. Blizzard has emphasized the importance of the board in this contest, as that is where the action happens.
Now, Blizzard has not been successful with their stated goals. We have Shamans pushing upward of 30% of the ladder and the pirate package being played in 50%+ of the games at high ranks. This is the antithesis of variety. They have clearly made errors, and have owned up to them. They have explained that they did not anticipate cards such as Jade Lightning and Maelstrom Portal to be used in aggro, and were sorely surprised when they were. Claims that Blizzard is purposefully creating this situation are baseless conspiracy theories.
So why is it that Blizzard keeps erring on the side of aggression? Why don't they "learn" from their mistakes? Why don't they do what Asmodeus recommends and print more powerful, flexible reactionary cards? I would argue, and this is clearly where we differ, that a "control meta" would be far, far worse than what we have now.
Max McCall recently explained part of this idea in his post about combo decks. The essence of the problem isn't that Blizzard "hates" control or combo. They are good, important, and are supported every single expansion. The issue is that when they make up the majority of the games they are a problem, because even if they are high skill they are low interaction.
Allow me to use this game as an example. Are there interesting turns? Certainly. But notice how many of them are Hero Power -> Pass, or turns in which StrifeCro purposefully plays nothing because he is trying to force his opponent to cap on cards. As a one-off, this is interesting. It is different than normal (variety) and so a unique experience about how to think about the game in a new way, and certainly required a greater degree of skill and understanding than playing his entire hand out by turn 5. But would you really want a game in which the common strategy is to play nothing for several turns? To have game after game feel like a Mexican standoff?
This is why I am also very excited about Renomage and Renolock as decks. They are much more active and dynamic compared to the old school of control decks, and offer the possibility that one day we can have a slower meta which still involves engaging gameplay. Does this involve making control more "aggressive"? Yes, it does. But truly, if the majority of the ladder ever becomes classic Control Warrior the game will suffer.
1
1
Okay, so now that we've apparently gotten our terms crossed...let's try this again.
@Hooghout, your concern is specifically that decks which have "aggressive" strategies are have held too much influence on the history of Hearthstone. Furthermore, the reason they have been too common is due to the mismanagement by Team 5.
And to avoid any confusion:
Did I miss anything? Specifically, am I misrepresenting your arguments in any way? Is there anything that you wish to add to clarify on your position? Am I twisting your words?
1
3
2
12
I won't miss dragons much, mostly because I feel like they've gone off the rails from their original design. Let me explain:
So my issue is that I liked the original hand-dragon mechanic because it promoted running large, impactful minions which you wanted to play but which were dead cards against aggro. Over time it has just become another fairly generic way to play over-statted minions on curve with Wyrmrest Agent into Twilight Guardian into Drakonid Operative. I appreciate that the original model did not work and Blizzard had to do something, but I feel no fondness for the place we've ended up.