well in tempo mage every minion is really powerful but it's only cause the deck has a lot of spells.. the old combo druid had all it's minions had taunt since every minion could mean more dmg for combo..
but the deck that has the most "must remove" is tempo mage.
1
2
1
1
I agree with OP. Anyone who beats me is a cheap, no skill, talentless noob. If they haven't spent years and gallons of money (yes, gallons) acquiring large and varied collections, how dare they beat me with a shaman totem deck. Can you believe these noobs basing a shaman deck on totems? I mean, how lame is that right?
1
2
1. How exactly is Blizzard "luring" new players to the game with "cheap" decks, when new players know next to nothing about the meta before they start playing? I just started playing recently and when I started HS, I had no idea what "zoolock" or "aggro shaman" was.
2. They're not actually that cheap unless you have no qualms about dusting every single free (and good) card you get, so you can construct one single deck. I'd be lucky if I dusted my entire collection and could craft a single legendary. I think your definition of "cheap" is a bit...off.
3. These are metas made popular by players, not an evil cabal of devs who just want your money.
4. Also, of course Blizzard wants money. They're a game company. They makes games...for money. McDonalds makes cheeseburgers because they want money and people want cheeseburgers. Shocking stuff.
2
1
You realize MOST players have nowhere near "almost a full collection of cards" right? I'm sorry everyone else hasn't invested the time and/or money to be as original as you.
It sounds like you don't think you deserve to be beaten by these "net decks." If you're repeatedly playing against the same cheap decks, then why not devise a cheap counter-deck. Since you have "almost a full collection", it shouldn't be hard.
As a relatively new player, I've been repeatedly and constantly matched against players slapping down rares, epics and multiple legendaries left and right in the same game. I played a game recently, where a player whipped out a Reno Jackson when I had nearly killed him. Did I concede when he regained full health and I was down to 12 and could have been killed in a single turn? Nope. I kept playing...and he ended up conceding...against my "cheap" basic deck, which was based on a net deck (le gasp!), but since I didn't have anywhere near the cards called for was mostly substituted with cheap commons, using a similar principle.
Does this make me one of those "cancerous types of players" you claim you are being beaten by? How exactly should I be original? Should I dust my entire card collection for a single Yogg Saron so I can be whacky and innovative?