I think this is actually really bad. If you don’t kill it off the turn you play it, it is a corruption the comes with a moon fire and cost 2 more mana, so a far worse version of a card that really never sees play.
so you have to kill it off the turn it comes into play.
how about warrior! They have lots of whirl wind effects.
but there is just another excaute that costs 1 more and is harder to activate. And doe control warrior really want more large target removal? After 2 exacutes and 2 shield slams, I don’t think so
It can be a assinate in mage! But then just play polymorph or meteor both are almost always way better.
get six boars, and do 24 by hand, 26 with hero power.
Use Tol'vir Warden and stuff to make consistent. The combo is scalable, cards are good on there own, and can be made very consistent with hunter filtering,
Hammer of Wrath never really saw play. this has plus one mana for plus one damage, but the draw is not from your deck and is conditional. it's pretty bad.
the apex of a Johny card. it is really bad, but it is the type of card that challenges to combo with to do something really broken. there is so much to explore there and attempt to find a way to make it playable. Is it even close to competitive? no. But this is the type of card people will return to time and time again to look for a way to break it. The card is awful, but that doesn't mean it's not an interesting addition to the game.
I think easily. Play 2 golackas and two of these for kelseth. This is exactly what zoo wants, letting you protect your snowball 3 drops. I honestly think kelseth is good mostly because there are know really insane 2 drops in warlock or rouge
I'm at rank 4, and this is by far the most diverse and interesting meta we have had since old gods, mabey even pre naxx. Lots of different decks, all of which have extremely unique game plans and play styles. Mabey it's just your perception, or rank 15 is more homogeneous than rank 5, but this meta has been super interesting so far
0
OH wAiT I aCtulally dOn’t.
https://hsreplay.net/cards/#sortBy=includedPopularity
0
I like how hyper-consistent it is. a cool interaction is that you can combo with a unleash hound rather than a boar
0
But then it’s just a harder to activate exacute that cost 1 more mana.
and after 2 exacutes and 2 sheildslams, do really want more conditional hard removal?
-2
I think this is actually really bad. If you don’t kill it off the turn you play it, it is a corruption the comes with a moon fire and cost 2 more mana, so a far worse version of a card that really never sees play.
so you have to kill it off the turn it comes into play.
how about warrior! They have lots of whirl wind effects.
but there is just another excaute that costs 1 more and is harder to activate. And doe control warrior really want more large target removal? After 2 exacutes and 2 shield slams, I don’t think so
It can be a assinate in mage! But then just play polymorph or meteor both are almost always way better.
to sum it up, this card is really bad.
always fun to have in arena though!
2
19 damage with only one kill command and 3 boars.
get six boars, and do 24 by hand, 26 with hero power.
Use Tol'vir Warden and stuff to make consistent. The combo is scalable, cards are good on there own, and can be made very consistent with hunter filtering,
2
Is it weird that I feel like I would almost play this in zoo for stats alone?
2
Hammer of Wrath never really saw play. this has plus one mana for plus one damage, but the draw is not from your deck and is conditional. it's pretty bad.
-1
when was the last time you saw Cobalt Scalebane ?
I have not seen it anywhere really since bonemare nerf
3
Reminds me of the MTG card "one with nothing", mega unplayable, but has the chance to be great.
really great video essay on the card---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ndD-QmPJg
the apex of a Johny card. it is really bad, but it is the type of card that challenges to combo with to do something really broken. there is so much to explore there and attempt to find a way to make it playable. Is it even close to competitive? no. But this is the type of card people will return to time and time again to look for a way to break it. The card is awful, but that doesn't mean it's not an interesting addition to the game.
1
now we can play this brawl without dreadsteed! is basically a whole new brawl!
2
I think easily. Play 2 golackas and two of these for kelseth. This is exactly what zoo wants, letting you protect your snowball 3 drops. I honestly think kelseth is good mostly because there are know really insane 2 drops in warlock or rouge
0
People seem to be struggling with balancing these effects. most things are broken, or super broken
0
Battletag:Narwhal#1466
Region: Na
Trade Only?: Yes. you go first.
3
I'm at rank 4, and this is by far the most diverse and interesting meta we have had since old gods, mabey even pre naxx. Lots of different decks, all of which have extremely unique game plans and play styles. Mabey it's just your perception, or rank 15 is more homogeneous than rank 5, but this meta has been super interesting so far
1
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/772179-ungoro-budget-jade-druid
I did some quick theory crafting, and it looks like budget jade druid should still be very good in the post ungoro meta.