i main CW and have both golden priest and cw, currently at rank 2 (Was 1 yesterday) and I can say that entomb has shifted priest vs cw gone from 70% cw to 70% priest.
As a side note, i was just watching amaz at work, he's using a very similar deck, and said cw is the best matchup for this deck.
i like your reviews, effort and time you put in making these videos, but i would really suggest you tone it down a bit on the "yoh" and "lol" etc. same things in every each of your comments make it a bit annoying :)
it doesn't though, warrior (assuming its control you're talking about) is actually one of the better matchups with this deck since you can actually play it to fatigue and win now, even though ofcourse thats not your only win condition.
Brann feels really underwhelming in this deck imo, especially in a paladin heavy meta. I like to run ooze, or even Harrison just to get more answers early.
that doesn't answer my question though, I'm asking why he chose to take this path and leave grommash out as opposed to Zalae's deck, like what are the pros and cons etc. I'm a huge control warrior fan and a pretty confident player (rank3) but i'm new to the fatigue decks
Hey Man, as you know Zalae is a known fatigue warrior player as well, and I was wondering why you don't have grommash in this deck? Especially in warrior vs warrior matchups or in any matchup, ability to deal 10 instant damage or just use it as a removal is just too big imo. WHat do you think?
1
I'm really a fan of running 2x shield slams and execute together with the weapons for any warrior list to be consistent.
0
he replaced velens chosen with acolytes
0
He's running acolyte of pains atm any idea what he replaced that for?
http://www.twitch.tv/zetalot/v/29367275?t=05h05m26s
0
i main CW and have both golden priest and cw, currently at rank 2 (Was 1 yesterday) and I can say that entomb has shifted priest vs cw gone from 70% cw to 70% priest.
As a side note, i was just watching amaz at work, he's using a very similar deck, and said cw is the best matchup for this deck.
0
at least 4 cards advantage with deathlord, entomb. if he runs acolytes and you can trigger it more than once its almost always a win.
trick is to never draw cards through clerics, power word shields etc.
you'll get used to it eventually dont worry
2
i like your reviews, effort and time you put in making these videos, but i would really suggest you tone it down a bit on the "yoh" and "lol" etc. same things in every each of your comments make it a bit annoying :)
2
it doesn't though, warrior (assuming its control you're talking about) is actually one of the better matchups with this deck since you can actually play it to fatigue and win now, even though ofcourse thats not your only win condition.
0
he's now playing with velens?
-6
1) these decktracker stats can be changed
2) there are no proof of this deck having a 84% winrate
3) even though i dont think a human being can go this low, there is no proof of you actually hitting legend this season
4) incosistencies between stats and title with the lack of battletag makes me feel like you're just making these up.
5
havent read so many wrongs in one post before, wow.
0
Brann feels really underwhelming in this deck imo, especially in a paladin heavy meta. I like to run ooze, or even Harrison just to get more answers early.
0
can you please explain how to win versus druid? I have 100% lose rate :(
0
hello,
thanks for the answer. may i ask how you deal with midrange hunters? aka savannah highmanes?
It's 8-0 for me with this deck atm so im loving it at rank 2
0
that doesn't answer my question though, I'm asking why he chose to take this path and leave grommash out as opposed to Zalae's deck, like what are the pros and cons etc. I'm a huge control warrior fan and a pretty confident player (rank3) but i'm new to the fatigue decks
0
Hey Man, as you know Zalae is a known fatigue warrior player as well, and I was wondering why you don't have grommash in this deck? Especially in warrior vs warrior matchups or in any matchup, ability to deal 10 instant damage or just use it as a removal is just too big imo. WHat do you think?