• 1

    posted a message on Dusting useless Legendarys

    Don't dust any of that shit man. Just because cards "aren't used" by spikes doesn't mean you can't use them yourself. Spike decks aka top tier net decks suck to play against, so be part of the solution, not the problem. Have a card that doesn't see play? Give it a home and see how it turns out. Sure you'll lose slightly more, but it's way more fun than playing the same matches over and over and over again. Here's another thing you'll have to deal with when dusting your entire collection to craft spike decks: MIRROR MATCHES. Everyone knows how fun mirrors are right? BUILD YOUR OWN UNIQUE DECKS AND HAVE ORIGINALITY. 

    Plus you only get 1/4 of your value back which is laughable. Its like trading into gamestop

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on Is Sky Gen'ral Kragg even worth keeping?

    DO NOT DUST ANYTHING. Even if this card wasn't amazing, which it is, there's literally 0 reason to dust anything. First off, you get 1/4 of the value. It's literally like trading your games to gamestop lol. Second off, most of the people on this game who DE stuff just use the dust to craft stupid tier 1 garbage, which makes the game crappier for everybody. You're going to get bored playing that crap after a day, trust me. Build your own decks. Experiment and actually play the game to have fun, not win. Be an individual!!

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Should I dust this golden legend

    NO. First off, those cards are not bad at all, and second off, don't copy that stupid netdeck. You see too many people playing that crap all the time. Be an individual, and make your own fun decks! If you just want to win to get your golden epic at the end of the month, play face hunter to get those fast wins at a cheap price. Don't ever dust stuff anyway because you never know when it'll be good, and you get absolutely terrible value from it. You literally get 25% of the value back. It's almost as bad as selling old games to gamestop. Not to mention the fact that you now have a chance to open up those same legendaries again, so that's like losing another 1200 dust.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Activision Blizzard And Google Start Partnership - Esports Events Now On Youtube

    YAY google owning more companies!!! Google please take my house and dog too!!!

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Where Are the Nerfs!! :(

    When they announced the first week that "nerfs are being announced next week", they literally announced them friday afternoon haha. I wouldn't be surprised if they did that again.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • -7

    posted a message on Descent of Dragons Balance Changes Announced - Battlegrounds Changes too!

    wow, what a disgusting dissapointment. I have to say, I actually had a lot of faith. Especially since Uldum was my favorite set ever. I was really hoping they were not only going to nerf every single galakrond card and the battlecry, but also what the invoke gets you... Total joke. Literally no one likes playing against that deck and the only people who enjoy playing it are spikes who would play any other top net-deck anyway.... And because these are the nerfs, we're going to have to wait at least another 2 months for the next set of nerfs...

    A lot of cool/exciting cards this expac and there were still more extremely interesting deck varieties in the last set. Too bad none of them will be fun to play because you'll be going against galakrond shaman, reno hunter, reno mage, reno warlock, face hunter, and galakrond rogue, and or turn 4 mana 2 77s.... The power creep was so bad this expac that literally, the net-outcome was that LESS cards are now in the game which is the exact opposite of what buying an expansion for a game should do... This is why you shouldn't hire mindless E-sport players who played 1 net-deck for 14 hours a day (chakki) as heads of the balance department.... And I didn't mention the fact that you can still only have 28 cards in a deck because it's mandatory to put in 2 copies of Faceless Corruptor in every deck no matter what because it's the most broken neutral card they've ever printed

    Posted in: News
  • 6

    posted a message on New Neutral Common Card Revealed - Platebreaker

    Where was this freaking card back in the year of the raven when every freaking deck got 20 armor?!!?!?

    Posted in: News
  • -3

    posted a message on Doom in the Tomb! New Event, Rewards and the 23 Cards Coming to Standard!

    What a great idea. Lets take the cards like Ragnaros the Firelord and Sylvannas Windrunner that everyone including the creators unanimously agreed were bad for the game, and put them back into standard!

    They've already shown like what they did last summer that taking good cards then buffing them and putting in cards like snip-snap is actually terrible for the game and causes the meta to become more stale. Having cards like snip-snap that are just really good cards makes it so hearthstone becomes a card game where you can make a deck of 29 cards instead of 30

    Posted in: News
  • 3

    posted a message on World Of Warcraft Classic

    I'm freaking losing it because of the fact that he asked that question 3 months ago and no one responded until Chutoinoir just now and he just says he didnt play it LMFAO! How did you even find this post!?!?!

    Posted in: Other Games
  • 3

    posted a message on Dust inflation is real

    I wouldn't use the term dust inflation here because that makes it sound like things cost more dust than before. I however believe that it was really bad for the game that they introduced having 2 legendaries per class every expansion in journey to un-goro. It does make each class slightly more interesting, but it skyrockets the cost of decks. The entire year of the mammoth, the paladin class was completely unplayable for most people because every single decent paladin deck contained at least 4 paladin only legendaries...

    People have to understand that blizzard is a company though. They employ a lot of people and they need to make money. They probably started doing that and making epics and legendaries more powerful as the expacs went on solely to make money. If anyone remembers back in the day, it was actually a meme how bad most legendaries and epics were. In the classic set, only a couple still see play, and it's loaded with worthless cards like Cho, Millhouse, and The Beast. It's no coincedence that they upped the power level of legendaries over the years. People are way too harsh on blizz for wanting to make money though. Remember the days when it cost 50$ (in 1990s money) to buy an N64 game? Games have way higher quality now, and are a lot cheaper. Look at games like Subnautica. That game cost 19.99$ and it would've been the greatest and most played game ever if it came out in 1999. The video game industry is struggling now because of things like piracy, and companies need to make money.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.