• 0

    posted a message on Wild

    Shadow priest is a delight for my deck. Rogue is quite prominent towards the end

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Wild

    I just wanted to say that despite I'm getting to the final boss and knocked back that I absolutely love the variety in wild.

    Even at rank 1 I'm coming up against what I would consider experimental decks.

    What is your opinion on wild?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Priest lacking board clears this expansion sets
    Quote from C_A_W >>

    Hopefully new Priest board clear coming in next expansion or mini set. They are some of the most creative cards Blizzard makes. 

     Couldn't have put it better. The more interesting games I play are with priest and their way to turn the game around.

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 0

    posted a message on Priest lacking board clears this expansion sets
    Quote from abupaco >>
    Quote from Wiggy_HS >>
    Quote from TheArcanist236 >>

    So, Breath plus: 4-mana deal two, 5-mana deal one and to 7+ mana cards. I'm not saying its barren, but it's underwhelming compared to priests of the past. I agree with OP that the class could use a reasonable board clear that doesn't require you to wait until two turns after DH kills you.

     so what the hell you ask for????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    freaking priests!!!!

    you play 20+ spells that didn't start in your deck-always the ones you need more-

    you play a minion then resummon it 15+ times

    Please priests quit playing this class or just Silence, like Lich king forced you in order to battle your disguisting class

    you and mages are the reason the game isn't  a serious competitive and pure fun. 

    Legit question here and im going to make a thread about it later....

    When you lose a game after playing 30 cards that you didn't plan to from the begining, how the hell you can learn from it, how you improve your game plans when all your wins are given by random extra cards ????????????????????????

    i ll tell you, you just never get better, you rely on discover or steal mecganics, so the answwr to OP question is

    you allready play constantly

     Flamestrike

     Blizzard

    Brawl

     Starfall

    Hagatha's Scheme

    and everything else suposed to be played by your opponent and not you, and you discover it excactly when you realy need it

    so stop crying

     

     

     This used to be the case. I rarely go against priest from 5-1 because of what I can only imagine is the same problems i've had. It's fine if this is just not priests expansion, I can accept that but I hope next expansion there is something that synergises with the idea of priest keeping up and clearing minions because at the moment it is seriously lacking. Try it.

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 0

    posted a message on Priest lacking board clears this expansion sets
    Quote from TheArcanist236 >>

     I admire the ambition but making it work in reality is another thing. Power word shield was just an enabler at 3 mana. Playing this at 5 mana is 'play a big minion with 1 dmg to all and end turn'.

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 1

    posted a message on Wait a minute...

    Is this canon?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Priest lacking board clears this expansion sets

    Not expecting a lightbomb or anything but just a raw AOE spell would be nice. I understand power levels differ between classes and such but just lacking a reset besides a 9 mana spell and a legendary spell that rams in to other minions by which point it can be difficult to recover from a big board.

    With the power word shield nerf it's difficult to include it whilst also keeping wild pyro alive through other means.

    The 5 mana dragon that deals 3 damage on deathrattle is just too clunky.

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 0

    posted a message on Everything is rigged!

    As soon as I read Everything is rigged followed by like playing a little game called Chess lately, I knew it was going to be something special.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Imagine a hearthstone without so much aggro

    Naw. They're my easy wins

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Furry cards

    Aya Blackpaw

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Furry cards

    I just think we need more

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on UNPOPULAR OPINION: I LOVE Hearthstone's New Update
    Quote from Thanatos7895 >>

    Not going past Silver 10 has nothing to do with you being f2p. A person of average intelligence can go past that with river crocolisks and oasis snapjaws.

     You're not wrong but the reason people don't do this is because it turns a somewhat long grind in to a significantly longer and more stressful grind at which point people might move on to other endeavours which damages everyone in the long run.

    If Blizzard came out and said that the previous model just wasn't economically viable then I think it provides a point which is difficult to argue and for which we might understand but to say everyone should play river crocs and snap jaws unless you're willing to pay, that just sends a message that those with cash with succeed far easier and quicker than those that don't at which point you need to ask yourself why is it a free game at all when they could just charge a base cost and have a much fairer game.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Rewards Track Client Patch - Updated With Gold Swaps For Packs

    I too am a ftp player. Before the expansion I would play one game of arena followed by ranked and slowly build up to 4000/5000 gold by the time the next expansion rolls out.

    I haven't looked in to the details but the sheer fact that I'm on minimal gold after about a week of playing is completely different from my previous experience. I feel as though I'm making no progress and if this continues by the time the next expansion rolls out I cannot see the point in continuing.

    As a ftp player, I really hope these changes get reversed.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on So, what do you think about Duels?
    Quote from P4dge >>
    Quote from MomoUk >>

    I really don't get why people hate RNG in hearthstone. I just feel like you have your expectations skewed when it comes to card games which are naturally based on the luck of the draw. This game doubles down on that but there are more predictable, strategic card games so rather than try to change this one more to your liking, why not try something that suits your play style better

    I like this game and the rng doesn't really bother me. If I wanted to play something more strst based there are other card games out there more suited so why play this one?

    [Edit] fixing my trash drunk typos

     

     I'm with you. It's the reason Hearthstone is the only card game I've ever properly played. Card games etc just aren't my 'scene'. Hearthstone is great fun though, sometimes the shenanigans go your way, others they go against you but all of the best moments I've had in hearthstone could probably be linked to some form of RNG. Whether that's pure luck, luck of the draw etc

    I played through with an alt account just for fun, see what it's like to start fresh and that grind through the newbie ranks is just awful. Mind numbing. Reason being? So many demon hunters (which I totally get, no grief aimed towards them or the class, it's extremely f2p friendly and I was using it for that exact reason myself) and I quickly found that DH mirrors were the closest thing to Hearthstone without RNG I've seen. Neither player really generates anything or has any RNG based cards and wow, it's boring as hell. Really painful.

    Long live the RNG. On the topic - I've really enjoyed duel to be honest. It will obviously get much, much more in depth and better etc. Everything in the game doesn't have to be for everyone. Battlegrounds isn't my bag, it's OK but I only play it if I have a quest for it. It's just not for me. Not once have I whinged about it though, I recognise that plenty of people love it. Great, good for them! Same with wild and arena. I have personally really enjoyed the dungeon run content they've done. I love the absurd things that can be pulled off that clearly can't ever make it into constructed. For a good whole I've wanted 'dungeon run vs other players'. Very nice surprise to hear about Duels, when the info dropped.

    If it's not for you, that's fine. There are plenty of games where I don't make use of certain modes or game types. I don't expect the game to be designed with me and my specific happiness at the centre of their decision making processes. 

     It's probably no coincidence that this is my first proper card game either. It might be that when you come from another card game that you have enjoyed for years and come to this, you have a certain level of expectation of what makes a good card game and this doesn't fit that mould but coming in as a new player, it seems fun.

    I would understand if this game started off as a strict strat game but it didn't.

    I like the early final fantasies but I accept people like the later ones and that's fine. There was a different team, different thought process so it's not logical to expect the same game.

    To say hearthstones RNG makes it bad. No. It's always been there on some level and that was always bound to increase in dynamic. If you want to play a pure strategy game then you're playing the wrong game and need to stop trying to mould this one in to your own view

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on So, what do you think about Duels?

    I really don't get why people hate RNG in hearthstone. I just feel like you have your expectations skewed when it comes to card games which are naturally based on the luck of the draw. This game doubles down on that but there are more predictable, strategic card games so rather than try to change this one more to your liking, why not try something that suits your play style better

    I like this game and the rng doesn't really bother me. If I wanted to play something more strst based there are other card games out there more suited so why play this one?

    [Edit] fixing my trash drunk typos

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.