I mean 4 mana Sorcerer's Apprentice is prolly enough, but why oh why blizz keeps insisting on making the reduction to 0 mana possible? most of the community was wanting a nerf that reads "but not less than (1)"
they printed Summoning Portal once, and they knew it would be important to prevent reduction to 0 mana. Just use the same logic, please blizz
The portal was broken bc of the interaction with the mech tribe. Sorcerer's gives u a single reduction aura to your spells , unlike the mechwarper snip snap portal combo.
WoW i just lost to an APM mage on his turn 4. Until then he did nothing but draw. Then coin into Sorcerer's Apprentice and Flamewaker to finish the game. Ok, that was surprising.
1
Battletag: HeinkelWolfe#2217Region: EUTrade only? : yes, you go first0
Battletag : HeinkelWolfe#2217Region : EUTrande only : yes, u go first0
Why are u ppl opening ur packs ?
1
Yea , i too am uninterested in Jaina's covered bosom.
0
Dont bother , they gutted apprentice. You didnt even need faster animations to burst down 60 hp opponents anyway.
0
The portal was broken bc of the interaction with the mech tribe. Sorcerer's gives u a single reduction aura to your spells , unlike the mechwarper snip snap portal combo.
0
Yes , its pointless.
0
Didnt play much past d5 , and i didnt see any mages running big spells on the way there. I guess i can use Breath of the Infinite for u.
0
Wow , they completely crippled mage ... forever. Oh well , time to abuse res priest again.
0
What rank ? What deck were u playing ?
0
Look at all of these PW complaining. What a sight!
0
If u play wild, ignite mage, otherwise any of the shitter rogue decks.
0
If you play wild , run wrenchcalibur since youre a greasy PW , otherwise run mutanus on standard.
0
Link to them stats and numbers ?
0
Why dont u just play it ?