Hearthpwn

Imagine quartz elemental have enrage, “im so angry i cant attack”. Not every minion need this weird enrage keyword.

Netdeck can refine deckbuilding skills.

Here.

Nice when it get summoned from recruit because of the word "After", and even if you topdeck this, you can still play it and swing with Woecleaver.

Okay, here's my art.

Unfortunately, ALL of my avatars are related to Hearthstone. I'll just share you my old meme-y avatar. You are free to make any kind of card of it, either playable card or for meme card.

Since the image is horizontal, make it a spell.

Quote from GerritDeMan >>

Quote from YouthThunder >>

 Perhaps you did not notice but I posted first so...... I guess my turn to make request first?

 Guess we posted it at roughly the same time, oh well

 Here you go.

Another related to shaman stuff, the reason is that his murloc quest sucks.

Next card art in the spoiler box, there is art about a mummy with a wielding curse power, give this minion an ability to give debuff to minions, with battlecry, deathrattle, or anything it can be. It can be a class card or neutral card. If you're going for neutral, make sure it's not a pack filler. Make it playable

Overload is there, to stop abuse of Doomhammer. You're getting 8 random shaman spells for free? Not on my watch.

Here's the art, neutral card only please.

Also... can we edit our comment? our number challenge is a bit wrong, let's start from SldyE's number. I'll re-edit it to challenge number 225. And thanks for making it into three tribes deck, it was cool!

Anyway here's the challenge:

Challenge #227
Animated Deck
Class: Mage
Format: Wild
Restrictions:
Include 2x Babbling Book, 2x Animated Armor, and 6 of any 0-Attack minion.
You must also have at least 4 secrets that interact with enemy spells.

Done challenge #226

Knowing my shaman have mastered 3 tribes (Totems, Elementals, and Murlocs), I’m quiet proud of my favorite class. Here’s deck:

Got lethal with bloodlust, Jaina thinks she’s safe after using ice block and Reno Jackson.

By the way my friend, those are a lot of nerfs and it will eventually lead to Priest Tier. Are you sure you want to do that?

I'm glad you're not part of Blizzard team. They are incredibly bad, as well as SI:7 nerf, why that?

Pretty sure Blizzard will nerf a number of cards once including rogue too (Most notably Raiding Party.)

I would say something that nobody will care but... I have stopped playing ranked because of Rogue too, so I wanted a break from ranked until I feel I want to play again.

EDIT: If there is any reason that there shouldn't be a nerf for Rogue, I'm fine with it, as long as there is a reasonable way to play against it, but for now... I just find it hard to deal with it, blame my bad skill I guess.

Ah well, I’m a casual browser of hearthpwn/ player of hearthstone, so I don’t really know where I can post this, or if I am even allowed to discuss such a topic. But this is something I would really like to gain some perspective on and rant about, whether this comment gets reported or whatever…

Summary: I was trying out a self-made Galakrond quest Priest, and matched up against this face hunter player. The game basically lasted 4 turns. I played my quest and the Renews in my hand since he decide to deal face damage early via leper gnomes and kobold sandtroopers. He abruptly conceded and then sent me a friend request which I naively accepted… Big mistake.

He proceeded to send this abomination to me, and then blocked me… I mean this is beyond rude. I am flabbergasted.. What is this community coming to? I remember when players would add one another to congratulate a game well played. This guy basically tried to go face, failed and then decided to throw personal insults at his opponent for playing his hand whilst hiding behind a screen.

Did I do smething wrong? How was what I did worthy of such an attack to my person?

Btw Toxxyn, if you happen to see this, just wanted to let you know the things you insulted me with were the very qualities you lacked judging from your behaviour. The least you could have done was to hear my side of the story before blocking me and then hiding away.  

I know the meta hasn't fully settled yet, but as a DH player (currently 125 ranked wins, around 2k legend rank in EU), there are a couple more nerfs that I think would make the meta a bit more stable:

Battlefiend to 1 attack, with his base stats and his effect, this is just a too good 1-drop not to play. Lowering his attack by 1 still makes him good, but not an auto-include.

Glaivebound Adept to 6 attack, his effect is already pretty strong so his stats could be weakened. By lowering his attack he is still very much playable, but deals a bit less damage if you can't remove it.

Priestess of Fury to 6 health. This minion is just too good. A mini-Ragnaros that can also attack and with his high health is also quite hard to remove. Making it easier to remove will make it a bit more fair while still keeping her good.

Skull of Gul'dan to 7 mana. This card is still bonkers at 6 and a auto-include in every different DH deck, 7 mana feels more fair, certainly compared to other cards which have a similar effect. (Sprint, Nourish)

Sacrificial Pact to only be able to target friendly demons. This card is just totally unfair. Classes should just be balanced and not rely on a card to cheat mana and health so you can win. This also nerfs Zephrys a little and makes Jaraxxus a little more playable, which I personally like.

While the Sacrificial Pact nerf might make the card unplayable (or just; made as intended I think), I don't think any of the cards are otherwise unplayable, but I do think this would be healthy to the meta. Seeing so many DH and anti-DH decks isn't how a meta should be. Every class should be balanced and I feel that DH isn't balanced yet. Maybe the underperforming classes can get more room to shine this way.

6 of the 7 fun friday decks are exclusive to Wild mode. Tells a lot about the soul-siphoning boredom that is standard right now. 

Some of the class forms are far too powerful, and some are far too weak.  I think each one would need to be tweaked in some way, but the idea is cool.

Why does blizzard LOVE [Deck i hate]?

At this point I couldn’t care less as I play hearthstone very rarely, but it’s odd how much Blizzard lives the archetype. Any ideas why?

is it because tech cards are expensive to craft so they like people spending their dust? This seems the most likely reason to me.

Is it because it would require a complete rework of the way i play the game? This is also likely but I’m not a deck builder so maybe this is actually an easy fix?

lots of people on this forum mention that the designers like to play this crap. Is this really likely? Has it ever been explicitly stated?

Os it because it’s “easily countered”? This is true for most deck archetypes but not a few. 

Whats funny is that people still feel like [specific card i hate in this instance] is the problem. At this point in the game it’s not even needed. So really I have no idea how to fix other than reworking the entire way i play. 

Its not a super high tier deck mind you, but the laughably easy piloting to victory is what makes it so annoying. Super high rolly though. Can steamroll or get rekt depending on the luck of the draw  

Thoughts?

Miss out on what? 

Doesn't matter how many headline-posts a website makes to cover these basic questions, there will always be countless threads made for it.

Hi Guys I was thinking about adding Baleful Banker and Predatory Instincts to a quest Druid Deck 

pretty simple, after you complete the quest you play Wardruid Loti (4/6cost 3 )  and banker,

then use predatory instinct to draw loti whit double health 

Do you guys think it will work? Obviously a bit of a meme but a 4/12 whit rushpoisonspelldamagetauntstealth is not that bad . :)

Good to see there are other people eager to try out the Warrior Quest even tho Dr.Boom exists. I’m probably gonna try a tempo list in Wild which includes Upgrade!, N’Zoth’s First Mate and Arathi Weaponsmith. My question to you is why do you want to include Octosari in the deck? I believe he lacks power as you have less control over the moment he dies in your list. I also think he will most likely burn atleast 2-3 cards when he does eventually die. Care to explain?

Quote from Pneumoniac >>

You literally completely missed the point. Deckbuilder has no influence on how good the card/deck actually is until you test it. The fun of a new expansion (for me anyway) was the first few days where people built everything themselves and its mainly experimental. Now only the streamers get that pleasure, because by the time they are are done, everyone kinda knows what is strong and what isn't. Yes these decks aren't refined (I'm also talking about decks streamers post on YouTube ect) but they are tested enough for people just to copy and paste them and be sure enough they will be strong enough to steam roll anyone who has tried to experiment. I still can't wait to play the expansion, and I do have a few ideas of my own I want to try, but the frustration will come when I'm able to guess the majority of cards in my opponents deck as soon as I see his class at the start of a game. 

 This happens regardless of a few streamers play testing new cards.  And it happens in the first few weeks.  

So you're mad because you don't get to be surprised by new card mechanics?  And other people will know how some of the cards work?  

You should have done your homework and stayed far away from any spoilers.  That's on you my friend.