Don't understand this, shouldn't it be your opponent's Curses heal you. Or curses in your opponent's hand. This wording is weird
- Maskuser2
- Registered User
-
Member for 2 years, 2 months, and 5 days
Last active Sat, Feb, 11 2023 12:08:07 -
- 5
- 0 Followers
- 21 Total Posts
- 32 Thanks
6
a battle cry for rouge that makes things in the deck cheaper.. yeah. that wont be a problem at all.
2
how do you figure it does 12? also, no. It cost way to much and does very little for that late in the game. probably the worst legendary so far.
7
Believe it or not, some people may enjoy something you don't. Weird right?
-2
A turn 10 win more card. Dunno bout Wild. but useless in standard.
2
Hydra with rush. This gonna be some bs lol
2
Evolve is back.... yay... Everyone loves playing against that.. totally fair and not completely reliant on luck at all.
... God I hate evolve... its so stupid to play against.
0
yay.. more good damage buffing and rush for hunter.. they sure needed this...
-1
Calling it now that this gets nerfed to only hit minions.
2
Exactly. Blizzard really struggles with consistent wording and making this clear. I doubt anyone would not understand what the effect on him means, but indeed the wording is wrong.
It should read "Your opponents abyssal curses heal you for the damage they deal." Since they go directly into the opponents hand, and never belonged to you.
-2
A neutral Kayn without charge seems pretty decent to me. Cheaper too. Sure no charge and can silence your own stuff, but in aggro you most likely wont really care about that, and silencing your enemies is way better than just ignoring taunt.
I dont really get the hate for it.
Also, Im pretty sure we are gonna get some minions that you want to silence yourself and other silence synergy cards since they made that priest silence/copy card.
Not that i expect that to work, since it never has yet.