Hearthpwn

Yeah im sure Blizzard is all over card balances.  Its not like they aren't under the biggest flak they've been by the community 

This is the way

Quote from SCWT_FTW >>

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from Tyk3 >>

Biggest improvement for me would be if they included it at least in the price of the mega bundle, if not both bundles. They could still sell it seperate too but £60 / €70 so you're set for a new expansion and a season of battlegrounds seems reasonable to me.

 Oh wow, totally agree with this.

---------

I like ALL of this so much. I think even reducing the price of packs & dust cost of cards that are no longer current would be great.

I really wanna try some decks, but some of them require legendaries I don't have from last year. Am I gonna craft a card I'll only be using in standard for 4-5 months? It'd be nice if it was like... 800 dust instead or something.

And then I think classic packs and cards should cost half as much as they do. This'd be especially good for getting new players into the game.

I don't mind the pack rewards, but we should get like 3 packs (300g value). Not 1 (100g value). Especially when the gold rewards in that tier are 150. How does that even make sense.

 

Quote from ShadowAldrius >>

Quote from Tyk3 >>

Biggest improvement for me would be if they included it at least in the price of the mega bundle, if not both bundles. They could still sell it seperate too but £60 / €70 so you're set for a new expansion and a season of battlegrounds seems reasonable to me.

 Oh wow, totally agree with this.

---------

I like ALL of this so much. I think even reducing the price of packs & dust cost of cards that are no longer current would be great.

I really wanna try some decks, but some of them require legendaries I don't have from last year. Am I gonna craft a card I'll only be using in standard for 4-5 months? It'd be nice if it was like... 800 dust instead or something.

And then I think classic packs and cards should cost half as much as they do. This'd be especially good for getting new players into the game.

I don't mind the pack rewards, but we should get like 3 packs (300g value). Not 1 (100g value). Especially when the gold rewards in that tier are 150. How does that even make sense.

 Oooh. The idea of making cards cost less to craft due to little remaining time in the rotation is really interesting! They already do this with the BG pass (making it cost half after half the cycle is over), so doing it with legendaries too would be cool. I guess the counter argument from Blizzard would be “But you can play it in Wild.” That’s just not compelling to me though since Wild is horrible 

 "Since Wild seems to be horrible imo" there its fixed

Quote from SirFabioRosado >>

All i see is people cry theyr asses out, out do you think people make money kidos? Just be happy that you have an amazing game to play, you don't need to buy shit, your problem is that you re too lazy to spend the needed time to get a good collection, that's how u reach the level of people who spend money and naturally have better cards, i am a spender my self i like to buy bundles now and then and i don't really get this crying shit, one day they just leave this game with theyr salty community, this becomes league of legends and no one plays it, then you will be happy with your misleaded fucking frustration

 Just crying cause Blizzard lied about the time requirements. You do say if " u want to have as much as a spender of lets say mega bundle than put ur time in it" and its in ur right cause ppl could indeed have the opportunity to buy 80 packs for free just with the gold they could collect by only playing an hour per day.

Thing is Blizzard said u could get the same amount of gold with the same time requirements so casuals wouldn't be hurt and if anything they could even profit from the new system. Stats show otherwise. And the fact they already swapping some rewards for straight hard gold just goes to show this. They wre only hoping ppl wouldn't notice. Well ppl arent sleeping

Quote from Spectralfire1984 >>

Please show us the math.  It's becoming an unsubstantiated claim at this point.  Like many players I've chosen not to buy the tavern pass.  Fine with it.  If you don't like the product, you don't have to buy it.  But what's the point in trying to sink the company if other players feel like the price of the product is worth it to them.  Just do you and move on eh?  

 Plenty of ppl have done it. If had been up to date in the posts on sites like out of cards or reddit or yth from content creators you could see that.

Quote from P4dge >>

I'm really enjoying the expansion, personally. If others aren't, sorry. Maybe of enough people leave, they will make the changes you ask for. If not, I hope those people find other games they enjoy and the people who continue to enjoy Hearthstone can do so. 

 And the expansion is not the problem. Content creators like zeddy that were the forerunners of this movement say that they really are liking the expansion.

Issue is regarding the battle tracking rewards system where ppl have done the math and concluded you re bound to get around 2k or less gold by the start of new set.

BLIZZARD LIED when they said u would get the same gold with the same time invested. Guess what? u need to spend 3 or 4  more time playing the game to get around the same gold as before.

Thats issue being discussed

Quote from Nicodemus >>

Hmm, I'm loving ducking in for a few standard games. Playing a lot of Tempo mage, lots of choices so it's interesting to play. Though I know the randomness annoys some others that can't get that it's just a tempo deck. Loving battlegrounds, had to learn a lot to do well. Finally admitted to myself that it's a losing strategy to start with elementals and try to high roll into them. It's best to play Tempo in BG then pivot to elementals with a luck Rag, etc. Overall happy with the game. but it did change enough that I had to relearn it. I think some people who once they become experts in one subset of the game get confused that they are no longer experts, and then start complaining because they forgot they were supposed to switch back to learning mode and expected just to win. 

 

 Why are u commenting on Battlegrounds?  It's a different game. If u think its just a game mode then why not state your opinion on Arena mode?

I agree with everything else u just said

Hunter got nerfed. Guardian Animals is a hunter card too lol

tech in grizzled guardian and sir finley combo

Cmon this is stupid. Of course they played something that steals stuff and u just missed. Since there's no pic to back up your claim then its safe to assume u missed something 

Just unbuff that 1 drop to make it the original 2 mana. Maybe just change it to 2 mana 2/4 and its done

Does this deck fares well against aggro? For example Secret Mage

Polket. It is known

Yeah right buff him so odd decks are even more powerful at its top end. He has been powercreeped like Rag has and so many others. Its the nature of the game 

The only part that counts is from Diamond 5 or old rank 5 to Legend. So before u needed 25 stars now its 15 stars. So 10 in difference makes the ladder to legend from being a hell path to a easy baby ride?

Whatever you guys are drinking  I'll take two