• 5

    posted a message on Voicing my dissatisfaction

    DUDE....Hearthstone fucking SUCKS. It is living off of the reputation it established 5 years ago when it was a (mostly) very very very good game.  It fucking sucks now, though.  I feel sorry for anyone trying to actually play it now and never having experienced when it actually WAS fun to play.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Disenchant Golden Solarian
    Quote from evelil >>

    Lol don’t be so mad. Im no dusting solarian because I will playing him all the time in my HL deck. I got enough dust/gold for next exp anyway

     Who's mad??  Oh wait....you are one of THOSE idiots that think everybody who disagrees with you is either "mad" or "fake news".  There's not even a shred of anger in this thread.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 2020 Hall of Fame
    Quote from Dorrian >>

    If control/combo decks can have access to Neutral Taunts/Heals/Rush options, then Aggro should have access to Neutral Chargers.

    The meta game isn't even dominated by aggro. Face Hunter made ONE appearance in the meta, the literal first time its been relevant since like, 2016, and that was only because Rogue and Shaman were top of the meta. A class who has always been weak to aggro and a Shaman deck that didn't have tons of AOE/Healing for once, which also proved to be a good match up for Face Hunter to win against.

    Other than that, Aggro hasn't really been a thing. Stop trying to take tools away from it, we don't need another snorefest meta where the only viable decks are greedy decks making infinite value while having enough Taunts/AOEs to curb stomp aggro while getting there, like the Deathknight metas. Hearthstone panders heavily towards Value/Control decks as is and has been for a long time. Aggro hardly gets anything nowadays, it doesn't need what few things it has, taken away.

     What a surprise...brainless aggro player has absolutely no clue.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 7

    posted a message on Can we change Baron Rivendare??
    Quote from thazud >>

    This seems like a salt thread. Did you just lose to a deathrattle deck? Umbra and Rivendare are not part of any issue related to Hearthstone 

     Whaaaaaat????  Did you even read the OP, or just the title??  Getaclue.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Zephrys = Broken AF
    Quote from Hooghout >>

    So in this little thread the fanboy-pundits and the ordinary ones bind together once again as Hearthstone Mandarins. Doing the bidding of their intellectual masters riding the bandwagon as fellow travellers defending skill-contemptious card design.

    Let me look over the weeds.

    Did angry kids just found a new Barnes to blame?

    Typical comment of an fanboy-commoner. No arguments, not even bad ones. These are the Blizzards foot soldiers. Cannon feed. Not much respect.

    That is exactly what I say about the card that I recently lost to.

    Same as the above. The stupidity flows like a festering wound.

    If you outplayed your opponent for several turns, there is no single one card that will just hand them the win. If a single Classic/Basic Set card is enough to fully turn the game you say you were outplaying your opponent in, then you overestimated your position

    Ah yes, here we have true HS-pundit comment. Always getting the likes he's looking for. Outplaying your opponent for several turns? There's hardly such thing as outplaying your opponent in HS. For that the game is too aggressive, the skill floor too low. Not to speak of to steep a RPS, combined withan abundance of randomness. But he good try. You got your like!

    It doesn't undermine anything. It simply adds a very annoying aspect to the game. It forces the player to contemplate at all times, if the opponent plays the card, what is the way in which it will fuck you up the hardest, out of every card in the Classic and Basic Sets.

    Same speaker. Same pundit. A joy to read bandwagon commentators. Zephrys doesn't force anything. It is designed as a extremely political card that benefits aggressive decks more than the more thoughtful, slower gameplay. It is designed to attract players looking for fast and easy winfix strategy. In danger of losing the board? Play Zeph. wisely for the right tempo swing.

    Losing to this card is like losing against junior, while you are the more experienced senior. One time, no problem, but as a systemic disease it's target audience oriented. It is there to curb winning based on skill.

     

     1). Your condescending tone is disgusting.  GTFO with that.

    2). Zephrys is for aggro decks?  REALLY?  That's just plain WRONG.  What successful aggro highlander deck has there ever been??  None.  And seeing why is SO easy.  Aggro decks rely on the consistency of getting on the board early and maintaining control of the board.  Highlander decks are the OPPOSITE of consistent.  Apart from that, there are never 30 aggro viable cards available to a class at any one time.  The notion that Zephrys is meant for aggro is LAUGHABLE.

    3).  Zephrys does what?  It REACTS to the current board state.  By definition, it is a REACTIVE card and, as such, is best suited to a deck that has that play style...aka control (and some midrange) decks, primarily. 

    Posted in: Streams and Videos
  • 9

    posted a message on HS is losing it's players big time

    To all the people in denial....if you can't see the many MANY signs that HS is losing it's playerbase, and has been for a while now, you just aren't very perceptive.  The signs are literally everywhere and the cherry on top is the devs asking people who play less what can be done to improve the game such that they might play more again.  But hey...keep on ignoring the obvious.  It's probably how you manage to get through your life in the first place. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Cards that no one cared about and now are meta
    Quote from Kovachut >>

    A small commentary on some people's posts:

    To be fair no one (or very few people) thought Fungalmancer was a strong card, because in the early KoFT some cards weren't nerfed yet. Raza Priest was running rampant, Corridor Creeper, Bonemare and Patches the Pirate were the stronger inclusions for odd decks.

     

     Ummmm there were no odd decks during KotFT.  Baku is a Witchwood card....two expansions later, lol.  And Fungalmancer is a K&C card...so you are kinda confused.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on New control quest warrior 90% winrate

    And/or you need to git gud.

    Posted in: New control quest warrior 90% winrate
  • -6

    posted a message on Hearthstone Balance Changes Incoming - Information Coming Next Week
    Quote from Dweight888 >>

    We need to deal with quest rogue - quest, sonya, giggling...Then the powercreep of druid will be reduced imho. (not all of them)

    How can a deck need to be dealt with when it gets completely countered by an entire archtype (aggro)?

    Is this a "Deal with a deck that is broken and actual Tier 0 status" or just a "Control struggles with a deck and is annoying if you're not playing the aggro counter so it should be nerfed" issue?

     For the same reason it got nerfed the last time.  Because the deck is a solitaire deck and pretty much the entire population of HS players HATE it, both aggro AND control players, except dbags that play the deck.  Clear now??

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Hit Rank 2!!!
    Quote from ColdFusion123 >>

    Congrats for your rank 2!

    If you can hit rank 5 constantly, you can hit legend, it's only a matter of investing more time. 

     That, IMO, is not 100% true.  Some people just do not have the emotional makeup to get to Legendary.  There is actually a pretty big difference in rank 5 compared to Legendary.  Someone who tilts, for example, will probably never make Legend, even though they might make rank 5 because the difference between winning and losing above rank 5 can be so small...if you are a tilter, it's a harsh environment to thrive in.  I say this because the guy who introduced me to HS himself could never make Legend no matter how many games he played...but made rank 5 90% of the time.  Topped out at rank 1 once or twice, but still...never Legend.  And IMO it was because he simply couldn't handle the pressure he put on himself when he would get close.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.