• 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx>>
     Nope, wrong again.
    Same answer 3 times in a row without any explanation or elaboration. It seems like you are not even reading my comments. Clearly you are no academic and you skills i arguing is objectivly below my level. Hence i see no point in discussing this case any further and will dismiss it with prejudice.
     
    I have no obligation to clarify where you're wrong.
    Also you probably meant "your" instead of "you", "at" instead of "i" and "objectively" instead of "objectivly".
    Thanks for participating anyway.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    You can still lecture people without being better than them, just like an alcoholic can tell you that you drink too much. 
     Then you were wrong.
     So you claim in other words that you can't lecture people if you aren't better than them?
     Nope, wrong again.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
     
     The "," is totally unwarranted here and that "about them" also doesn't make sense. Polish your language before lecturing others.
     Wrong, you can still lecture people without being better than them, just like an alcoholic can tell you that you drink too much. 
     Wrong also, as I never said anything about it being impossible.
     What's being impossible? You said:
    Polish your language before lecturing others.
    I understood this as "you may not lecture others if you're not good enough in said subject".
     Then you were wrong.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Piterik >>

    I am not trying to get it. not Even Golden Recruits. Bli$$ard can make money with WOW on somebody else

     You do realize Liadrin is 100% free to get, right?
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Unforgiven_Joker >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
     
     The "," is totally unwarranted here and that "about them" also doesn't make sense. Polish your language before lecturing others.
     Wrong, you can still lecture people without being better than them, just like an alcoholic can tell you that you drink too much. 
     Wrong also, as I never said anything about it being impossible.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Komorebi3 >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Komorebi3 >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>

    "OOPS: An error, to be sure."

    Shouldn't it be "for sure"?

    What the hell does "An error, to be sure" even means?

     It makes sense, learn English before actually complaining about them please.
     Except I know english pretty well and "for sure" makes a lot more sense. Go be a smartass somewhere else.
     Can't exactly help it, when I see posts like yours.
     The "," is totally unwarranted here and that "about them" also doesn't make sense. Polish your language before lecturing others.
     You're confusing "makes less sense than X" with "doesn't make sense".
     Nope. "Them" what? Try again.
     I was talking about the Lady Liadrin emote. Also I'm not the same person as the one who said the "them" stuff you're referring to.
     So why are you butting in?
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Komorebi3 >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>

    "OOPS: An error, to be sure."

    Shouldn't it be "for sure"?

    What the hell does "An error, to be sure" even means?

     It makes sense, learn English before actually complaining about them please.
     Except I know english pretty well and "for sure" makes a lot more sense. Go be a smartass somewhere else.
     Can't exactly help it, when I see posts like yours.
     The "," is totally unwarranted here and that "about them" also doesn't make sense. Polish your language before lecturing others.
     You're confusing "makes less sense than X" with "doesn't make sense".
     Nope. "Them" what? Try again.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on New Card - Klaxxi Amber-Weaver

    I feel like Blizzard has learned their lesson from the disaster that was the Joust mechanic >> slightly above standard if won, below standard if lost, overall not worth the risk.

    Now they're just printing good efficient vanilla cards (this is basically a yeti) with an upside in case you got the conditions right. I like it.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>

    "OOPS: An error, to be sure."

    Shouldn't it be "for sure"?

    What the hell does "An error, to be sure" even means?

     It makes sense, learn English before actually complaining about them please.
     Except I know english pretty well and "for sure" makes a lot more sense. Go be a smartass somewhere else.
     Can't exactly help it, when I see posts like yours.
     The "," is totally unwarranted here and that "about them" also doesn't make sense. Polish your language before lecturing others.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion
    Quote from Nikos_the_great >>
    Quote from MalakyEx >>

    "OOPS: An error, to be sure."

    Shouldn't it be "for sure"?

    What the hell does "An error, to be sure" even means?

     It makes sense, learn English before actually complaining about them please.
     Except I know english pretty well and "for sure" makes a lot more sense. Go be a smartass somewhere else.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Lady Liadrin - Get it through a World of Warcraft Promotion

    "OOPS: An error, to be sure."

    Shouldn't it be "for sure"?

    What the hell does "An error, to be sure" even means?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Lady Liadrin Tokens
    Quote from AcidanceHS >>
    Quote from Psyc >>

    Why does blood elf summon humans with stupid helmets? Why are blizzard so lazy?

     Why are u so lazy to use ur brain for a second?
    Says the guy who types with "u".
    Checkmate.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on N'zoth card???????
    Quote from Thelkuzad >>

    @Komorebi3

     Then I'm disappointed in Blizzard. This is lore breaking beyond belief.

    This is lore breaking? THIS is lore breaking?! How about the fact that Anduin can take two direct hits from Deathwing and survive? How about the fact that an ogre and a crocodile can kill the Queen of all Dragons? How about the fact that Sneed's Old Shredder can contain anything from Archmage Antonidas to another Sneed's Old Shredder?

    And you're upset about the OLD GODS being lore breaking?! Give me a fucking break.

     You're clearly confusing suspension of disbelief with lore breaking.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Card - Validated Doomsayer
    Quote from Garlicnerd >>
    Also you said nothing of the fact that Fel Reaver loses even more to a card that sees twice as much play as owl. Big Game Hunter.
    The bad luck of seeing your opponent with a BGH ready is a lot more unlikely than the same opponent having
    a) a silence
    b) minions on board
    Which are both extremely common situations to face.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Card - Eater of Secrets

    Viable card for Wild, not so much for Standard.

    I laugh at the million dumbfaces saying how Secret Pala will be dead when with the loss of GvG and Naxx they're already going out.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.