• 4

    posted a message on Have you switched over to Out of Cards?

    I have, but we could continue to use more of you guys :D

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on It Is Time To Nerf SN1P-SNAP?
    Quote from DSchu102285 >>

    T5 will probably just keep nerfing other cards to accommodate this one legendary, instead of nerfing the free card that nobody paid dust or gold for.

    That's sound logic for you.

     That's very omniscient of you to know the fate of every single card and this free legendary. Why are you spending your time on a game when you can be investing in the stock market... lol?

    I'll save you the time... Hey I'm Lyra, I used the word "probably" and "logic" in the same post while assuming a particular outcome. But if that isn't true you can redact what I said.

    Aw, you're so cute. It's not like a certain reddit post or something mentioned potentially nerfing Mechwarper as well, just to accommodate SN1P SN4P. I guess reddit posts from the big boys upstairs suggesting more nerfs could potentially come must be me just assuming and pulling straws out of thin air.

    Dont' try and troll if you can't handle it and don't really know what it is you're getting into. :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on It Is Time To Nerf SN1P-SNAP?

    T5 will probably just keep nerfing other cards to accommodate this one legendary, instead of nerfing the free card that nobody paid dust or gold for.

    That's sound logic for you.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Token druid, a cancer on a otherwise good expansion
    Quote from Knotalmbout >>

    I assume everybody defending Token Druid is currently climbing the ladder with it.

    Just a lame concept and basically Odd Paladin 2.0

    We don’t need these type of decks, they literally do nothing for the game except help players with limited skill rank up. It’s boring and you pretty much win under the same condition.

    Flood, pray for no counters, buff, face, game

    I have to facepalm at these types of posts. Every playstyle is needed if you don't want one of the playstyles from getting too out of control.

    I'm curious though, tell me how most control decks out there do not also more or less win under the same win condition.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 9

    posted a message on Reckless Experimenter Nerf Coming June 3
    Quote from Klapka_Junior >>

    You shouldn't complain too much. We will get busted legendary FOR FREE and full disenchant value for barely used epic. 

    Really that's not the point. Reckless Experimenter was never a problematic card. Why should a card that has never caused problems be nerfed so that another flashy new card with a bunch of keywords vomitted on it can be released? It would've been easier to 'nerf' a card that hadn't even been released or given to a single player yet.

    They even talked about nerfing another card (Mechwarper) if it turns out that people can consistently abuse SN1P SN4P. That would be a second nerfed card just to release a mech legendary that will probably cause balance problems down the road anyway (and would cause a nerf that would kill my favorite deck in HS Spectral Pillager Rogue). I could care less about getting a pittance of 'free' dust. Decks that other players enjoy, and that are not even tier decks I might add, shouldn't have to be sacrificed so that we can get another card with too many keywords on it (Remember UI anyone?)

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Do you accept friend requests?

    Yep, but due to knowing that the majority are rage requests I always pull up the word doc with my "All The Salty Players" Single Ladies HS parody to get ready feast on their tears and begin spamming the lyrics to them if they start sending me anything other than normal conversations my way.

    No time for your complex here Mr. Magma Rager.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is this community getting more and more toxic?

    The problem is most people don't want a back and forth logical discussion about 90% of the things they talk about. They want a sounding board where they can insist that their feelings and opinions are objective and close down logical points that defeat their argument in many cases.

    It gets pretty predictable not only which topics or threads will result in this, but even some occasional posters on the forums as well. I don't usually blame people for responding in a toxic manner, even if their toxicity is for different reasons.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Warlock SN1P-SN4P will be insane!!

    The combo didn't take off with Ziliax, it won't take off with SN1P SN4P.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Reckless Experimenter Nerf Coming June 3
    Quote from JagBone >>

    Bruh... They have 1000+ card to take note off than doesn't even include the cards from the future sets. They have said it before there were at least 400+ cards designed and prototyped before choosing the ones for released. So, if you use your brain for a moment and ponder about that.... Then ya, they can miss this interaction. What's your response to that then?

    That they stop spamming so many keywords on one card expecting it to not be a problem?

    Didn't go well for UI don't see why it would go well for a cheap spamming magnetizing mech. Should be a no brainer that they more you put on any card the more problematic said card will be.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Reckless Experimenter Nerf Coming June 3
    Quote from Trimutius >>

    not in wild

     

    Regardless the card's design may also lead to Mechwarper getting nerfed in wild. The reddit post even referenced it, despite Mechwarper not being a problematic card in wild whatsoever.

    If you have to nerf multiple cards in older sets just to release one new card chances are very high that your new card is a badly designed one.

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.