Except the prime cleaely states on the card to hit only enemies when possible... So your scenario is 100% (your math was even wrong in your case as the mages face was also a possibility).
So many people calling Sylvannas scheme busted for a lame ass "OTK" that will only work half the time cause like Tog's or Hag's it requires pulling it turn one and holding it for 10-15 turns (more if they build armor at all) which sure, busted. But how often do literally any of you pull shit like that consistently?
Card is good, relies on RNG to be busted, just like a million other cards both real and not.
Also, you can run two copies of the card, so only their added value needs to exceed this (not saying whether it is actuallly good/busted or anything).
So, you are saying that it's unfair that rogue and warrior are able to get 12 wins, but then you boost about the fact that you got 12 wins with shaman and only loosing to increadable RNG?
My vote is for paradox, just because it is sich a nice wink to mathematics.
Even though technically it is not a paradox as it is an actually contradictory statement and a paradox is a statement that at first seems contradictory but turns out not to be.
Thanks let me know how it goes! I am also still tweaking the deck as I go, Righeous Protectors are always a good inclusions, was thinking about including them as well..
Hey man, I am still tweaking the deck at the moment so any suggestions are always welcome :)
I have included Uther of the Ebon Blade now as well yes :) I am not a big fan of Faceless Manipulator, a better idea would be prince-3 (although in my newer versions I play acolyte). Might actually be nice if you hit undatakah with the lens and can play them the same turn :)
I don't have an accurate winrate as I was playing on my phone most of the time without tracker; I'll keep you posted if I have some beter data.
0
Except the prime cleaely states on the card to hit only enemies when possible... So your scenario is 100% (your math was even wrong in your case as the mages face was also a possibility).
0
I agree, that would also have fixed prep and even shadow step/pick by itself to some extent!
1
This type of combo is the wrong type of conbo though..
0
Also, you can run two copies of the card, so only their added value needs to exceed this (not saying whether it is actuallly good/busted or anything).
2
So, you are saying that it's unfair that rogue and warrior are able to get 12 wins, but then you boost about the fact that you got 12 wins with shaman and only loosing to increadable RNG?
#feelwbadman
4
No. Druids should be more about healing then about armor.
4
Backstab is still 0 mana though...
0
You can always just sacrifice your other lackeys.
6
Yeah, that is why he is asking for an update, because that sucks.
0
My vote is for paradox, just because it is sich a nice wink to mathematics.
Even though technically it is not a paradox as it is an actually contradictory statement and a paradox is a statement that at first seems contradictory but turns out not to be.
0
A couple if things:
-card draw
-it might reduce a big drop, especially when you hit silver vanguard it helps a lot. But also nice if you hit spikeredged steed or sshivallah
-if a spell becomes more expensive it helps reduce shirvallah.
-the spells in the deck are extremely needed (like equality/conc/etc), so a tutor for a spell is very nice.
0
Thanks let me know how it goes! I am also still tweaking the deck as I go, Righeous Protectors are always a good inclusions, was thinking about including them as well..
0
Hey man, I am still tweaking the deck at the moment so any suggestions are always welcome :)
I have included Uther of the Ebon Blade now as well yes :) I am not a big fan of Faceless Manipulator, a better idea would be prince-3 (although in my newer versions I play acolyte). Might actually be nice if you hit undatakah with the lens and can play them the same turn :)
I don't have an accurate winrate as I was playing on my phone most of the time without tracker; I'll keep you posted if I have some beter data.
I'm not so good with Hearthpwn so I have made a second list: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1223477-immovable-object-paladin-2-0
0
Hey man,
The idea of this deck is so cool! Here is my take on it: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1223378-immovable-object-paladin
So far I have had a lot of succes with it :) (although I am not so high ranked yet)
Greetings!
2
Kingsbane is not nerved though?