I still hope it turns out to be fake somehow, I hate it. I don't want cards that meddle with your opponent's strategy so hard.
- LucasPassado
- Card Design Champion
-
Member for 8 years, 7 months, and 19 days
Last active Sun, Aug, 18 2019 08:42:15 -
- 9
- 20
- 94
- 0 Followers
- 1,244 Total Posts
- 1377 Thanks
-
81
FrostyFeetEU posted a message on New Warlock Card Revealed - GnomeferatuPosted in: Card Discussion -
52
b1ak1ce posted a message on New Warrior Card Reveal - Dead Man's HandPosted in: Card Discussionwho is ready for 45 min warrior mirrors?
-
19
FortyDust posted a message on The Most Fun Cards From Un'Goro You'll Never Play in RankedPosted in: NewsI feel like this article was written before the expansion's release, then got lost in the wrong folder for a while. They just recently found it, shrugged, and said, "Meh, it's probably accurate enough for Hearthpwn. No point in looking at actual decks in the actual meta to check for every single card we mentioned. Ain't nobody got time for that!"
-
60
fractl posted a message on Disturbing lack of LegendariesPosted in: General DiscussionI've played Hearthstone for two-and-a-half years, and have spent over $1000 on the game during that time. I'm an adult, good natured, and not someone that has ever complained about the game here or elsewhere... but I just opened 114 Un'Goro packs and got 3 legendaries. and a moderate amount of epics. This is extremely disappointing, to the point that I 've begun to feel rather ashamed of having gotten involved in what, in any other business arena, would essentially be considered a scam. With two legendaries being released for each class, and my now having only one quest card, plus this incredibly poor rate of drawing legendaries, the prospect of my getting to the point where I can really enjoy this expansion and get to play many different type of quests seems as if it would be absurdly expensive. And, like I said, this is from someone who has had no regrets spending over $1000. But this is totally ridiculous, if I project what this expansion would potentially cost me if I wanted to continue playing with a wide variety of decks.
I've been wondering how the game's makers would respond to the probability that the game's user base does not likely have much more room for expansion, since, occasionally, businesses with little perspective and a bad business model sometime attempt to compensate for such a situation by trying to take advantage of their existing customers when growth slows down. I was afraid I might see this happen with Hearthstone, and was concerned that the release of two legendaries per class might be a (not too subtle) sign of this, but I tried to keep an open mind. Getting only 3 legengaries in 114 packs, on the other hand, seems only to confirm my worse fears, and is making me wish that I'd never gotten involved in this illogical, virtual-pack nonsense to begin with. Maybe I'm the fool for having gone this far, but this is utterly ridiculous. In any other business arena, this business model would in itself be considered a scam or fraud, never mind with this type of result. I can't see myself continuing with the game.
-
3
CalemAnnk posted a message on Dead No More! Mankrik's Wife is Coming to a Hearthstone Near YouPosted in: NewsHis wifes name was Olgra, not Nadia. Where is the metal dragon that Legendaries usually have? Why can't Blizzard the HS team put more than 2 minutes of effort into this?
-
7
Infirc posted a message on New Card - Razorpetal VolleyPosted in: Card DiscussionQuote from BigFatMurloc >>Razorpetal cant be a 0 mana spell right? it MUST cost 1 mana...? This would be sooooo bonkers broken if those are 0 mana spells.
they have to cost 0, if they costed 1 then the card might just read 4 mana deal 2 damage, which is just a massively undercreeped consecration. -
2
definitelynotsalty posted a message on New Card - StormwatcherPosted in: Card DiscussionNightmare for priests.
-
4
Blue_Banana_whotookthisname posted a message on New Card - StormwatcherPosted in: Card DiscussionNot as bad as the other bad windfury minions, and has the ele tag. Still bad, but not "dust it" level.
-
4
ShadowSpectreX posted a message on New Card - ShellshifterPosted in: Card DiscussionI like how the Fandral token in some cases actually makes this card WORSE, since you can't even choose to have the taunt anymore on the turn you play it.
-
3
H1st0ry posted a message on New Card - Giant AnacondaPosted in: Card DiscussionOvercosted...
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
16
Silverback Patriarch cried
18
My submission, something else for ramp druid as more option!
2
I think this is the final version, is it ok and allowed?:
Thanks guys :)
1
Nice entries this week! I saw apple just now and I loved it, nice sinergy with other buff minions like Dire Wolf Alpha etc. Also, Circus Director was not supposed to be Silas Darkmoon?
1
Since now it's your hand, I think just as a legendary and as a 6/6 or 7/5 is ok. Making it legendary it's already a lot.
1
All giants? Haha, I like them but they don't have something very unique, understand? Something that you really needs to use in a deck, like mal'ganis, jaraxxus, antonidas do, etc, they just have a nice effect, the only two cards I need to talk about: Frost Giant - very underpower, very slow and a bad effect if you see the costs because also effects you, you just gain a small tempo. Sindragosa - Very op, very strong body, dragon sinergy, not in bgh hunter, freeze all enemy minions and deal 1 damage to them, freeze and the damage are 4/5 mana cost if you compare, so you get a very big body not in bgh target that gives you something very powerfull. Are there more cards?
1
1
Can I replace my entry? I made another for fun but I think this is the better than the one I submited ;d
6
Midrange rogues liked it!
1
Both have weird effects, in my opinion, for their cost, no one would use them.
Let me include this in my face hunter deck, very usefull