Well since Redskins didnt make it because they suck lol I guess I want the Panthers to go all the way. Too bad they lost that one game to the freaking FALCONS lol It would have been cool to see a team win the Super Bowl undefeated
There's nothing wrong with net decking. It would be pretty cool if people played their own decks but when the game rewards winning then playing an already tested deck is the best way to go. At least for those who want to maximize their time/gold when playing the game.
Besides, most popular decks are already fun to play so theres already a ton of decks out there for people to try and play them.
Tonight I got bored of playing ladder so I decided to play some Tavern Brawl. I thought most people would be trying to play combo based decks with weapons, rogues, shamans, etc.
Anyway I decided to follow Trump's advice and build a wall to deny all those illegal opponents reach their packs. I made a bolster warrior deck and I gotta say its pretty fun to play, even making people rage quit early on lol
They both cost 8 mana, their respective combo cost about the same and they can both burst for around the same amount of damage. They can both be used as a finisher or a removal/board control since they have charge.
So whats wrong with Al'Akir that makes people think he's awful when he can basically do for Shamans what Grommash does for Warriors?
0
Well since Redskins didnt make it because they suck lol I guess I want the Panthers to go all the way. Too bad they lost that one game to the freaking FALCONS lol It would have been cool to see a team win the Super Bowl undefeated
1
Freeze Mage
0
There's a new expansion with new formats coming, a lot of big changes. You should wait until then to use your gold/dust
0
Hearthstone needs a report system
14
No, I'm not a drama queen
0
I wouldn't craft anything with so many big changes coming soon.
1
Ugh omg, I finally got the I have a Secret one lol
0
There's nothing wrong with net decking. It would be pretty cool if people played their own decks but when the game rewards winning then playing an already tested deck is the best way to go. At least for those who want to maximize their time/gold when playing the game.
Besides, most popular decks are already fun to play so theres already a ton of decks out there for people to try and play them.
2
Tonight I got bored of playing ladder so I decided to play some Tavern Brawl. I thought most people would be trying to play combo based decks with weapons, rogues, shamans, etc.
Anyway I decided to follow Trump's advice and build a wall to deny all those illegal opponents reach their packs. I made a bolster warrior deck and I gotta say its pretty fun to play, even making people rage quit early on lol
Sorry, friend
6
Amazing click bait title.
0
I was wondering why Grommash Hellscream is played and Al'Akir the Windlord isn't.
They both cost 8 mana, their respective combo cost about the same and they can both burst for around the same amount of damage. They can both be used as a finisher or a removal/board control since they have charge.
So whats wrong with Al'Akir that makes people think he's awful when he can basically do for Shamans what Grommash does for Warriors?
11
I dont think I will dust any GvG or Naxx card, doesnt matter how useless it is. I want to collect them all
1
I will most likely just play standard most of the time but I hope they actually balance both formats
1
There's no option for people who will play both formats...
2
Formats arent supposed to fix net decking. You cant fix that anyway.