I play reno mage in wild and I think that Sindragosa fits a lot better in the deck than The Lich King does. Sindragosa gives you 1-2 Water Elementals and 2 ok minions whereas The Lich King usually only gives you one card, and the card it gives you is usually not necessary for your deck. For example, you wouldn't want to play the 6 mana and the 5 mana spell because they remove cards from your deck and make you fatigue faster, and mage has enough removal that it doesn't really need Obliterate or Death Coil.
Absolutely, I just played against 5 in a row. (I have played against more than 50 in the past year) They all had Barnes on turn 4. The most tilted thing to play against is Ragnaros the Firelord. If I play aggro they resurrect Obsidian Statue, if I play midrange I can't out value them, if I play control/otk they resurrect Ragnaros the Firelord. Unless you are mage or shaman and you draw your transforming spells before turn 4 or 6, you are very unlikely to win. A deck that counters 7 classes is not only unpleasant to play against, but also problematic because the only way you can win with those classes is to hope that they draw badly. which is not interactive.
Edit: I meant the 5 I played against in a row all had Barnes on turn 4, not all 50.
I tried the deck, won the first 2 games, and then I told myself to play until I lose a game. I ended up winning the first 8 games in a row, and lost to a quest warrior on my 9th game.
0
I could've won the game on turn one but I ran out of time
0
big priest and burn mage
1
I play reno mage in wild and I think that Sindragosa fits a lot better in the deck than The Lich King does. Sindragosa gives you 1-2 Water Elementals and 2 ok minions whereas The Lich King usually only gives you one card, and the card it gives you is usually not necessary for your deck. For example, you wouldn't want to play the 6 mana and the 5 mana spell because they remove cards from your deck and make you fatigue faster, and mage has enough removal that it doesn't really need Obliterate or Death Coil.
0
I don't have Kezan Mystic, so I put Acidic Swamp Ooze instead
0
Kel'Thuzad: At the end of your turn, summon all friendly minions that died
this turn.Foe Reaper 4000: Also damages the minions next to
whomeveritattacks. :)2
Spider
Tank2
You didn't watch the video, did you?
0
I reach rank 5 on both standard and wild every season. I enjoy wild more and I have crafted Aviana and Kun the Forgotten King
0
I think it's an interesting card and it is not too op since some dk cards need to be built around
0
[deleted]
1
Absolutely, I just played against 5 in a row. (I have played against more than 50 in the past year) They all had Barnes on turn 4. The most tilted thing to play against is Ragnaros the Firelord. If I play aggro they resurrect Obsidian Statue, if I play midrange I can't out value them, if I play control/otk they resurrect Ragnaros the Firelord. Unless you are mage or shaman and you draw your transforming spells before turn 4 or 6, you are very unlikely to win. A deck that counters 7 classes is not only unpleasant to play against, but also problematic because the only way you can win with those classes is to hope that they draw badly. which is not interactive.
Edit: I meant the 5 I played against in a row all had Barnes on turn 4, not all 50.
0
even otk decks can't beat big priest if they manage to resurrect tons of ragnaros
3
why Book of Specters? isn't it a bit too risky to lose spells since you only have one copy each? and it lowers the power level of Dragon's Fury
0
they can still use Doppelgangster in wild
0
I tried the deck, won the first 2 games, and then I told myself to play until I lose a game. I ended up winning the first 8 games in a row, and lost to a quest warrior on my 9th game.