Leeching Poison is biggest problem, because even if you take opponent down to small amount of hp he can heal by 20
- KoprQ
- Registered User
-
Member for 6 years, 8 months, and 7 days
Last active Tue, Aug, 29 2023 08:54:11 -
- 7
- 21
- 76
- 1 Follower
- 267 Total Posts
- 402 Thanks
-
13
FrostyFeetEU posted a message on New Warrior Legendary - Akali, the RhinoPosted in: Card DiscussionWhere is the beast tag?
Surprised that its not a beast.
Quote from AmmarDawood >>Wait it's not a beast ?!
Ssshhh. The tag was always there ;)
-
6
The_Duke posted a message on New Warrior Legendary - Akali, the RhinoPosted in: Card DiscussionSlow, expensive, easy to remove. But might support the rush package in CW
-
15
Neeson posted a message on what the card that made you hate hearthstone?Posted in: General DiscussionBarnes. Fuck big priest.
Naga sea witch- thank god it has been nerfed to oblivion
Kingsbane- rip all control decks.
-
16
shmeuraconda posted a message on New Druid Minion - Spirit of the RaptorPosted in: Card Discussionyes because druid was lacking in card draw
-
2
Garlicnerd posted a message on is trump good?Posted in: Players and Teams DiscussionHis predictions of cards are just pathetic, he has little idea of what makes cards strong or potentially strong.
I disagree. I think although his analysis on many cards have been well off the mark on many an occasion, his reasoning is well founded. Let’s take what most people take to be the most egregious example, his analysis of Warlock’s KotFT cards (and this actually ties into some confusions people have about his rating system).
Trumps rating system is not based on the individual strength of a card. He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards. In addition, when you make a claim about a card that’s based on pure powerlevel it’s impossible to ever actually prove it wrong since no matter what happens you can just say “the conditions aren’t right for it.” For this reason Trump designed a rating system which does not attempt to say how good the card is but instead only tries to predict the amount of play it sees. As trump admits, this makes his rating system much riskier as you can actually prove him wrong or right once the cards come out.
Now onto his Warlock predictions. Prior to Frozen Throne, Warlock was in such a bad shape that Trump believed that it was probably impossible for one set to pull Warlock out of the dumpster no matter how good the cards it got were. As it turned out, Warlock got some pretty crazy cards in Throne and Trump acknowledged this in his review. His assertion was that there still wasn’t a way for Warlocks to win games despite all of the insanely powerful defense tools they got (which he actually said were insanely powerful) since they didn’t have any kind of reliable wincon. The reason he was wrong was because practically everyone reviewing the set, including him, underestimated the independent strength of Bloodreaver Gul’Dan. Gul’dan is so good that you could make a serious arguement that Warlock wouldn’t see play right now we’re it not for Gul’dan, which actually means that we’re it not for Gul’Dan, all of Trumps other predictions on the Warlock cards would have been correct as none of them would see any play because Warlock would not see any play.
-
5
Paradov posted a message on is trump good?Posted in: Players and Teams DiscussionHe's garbage. His videos before the release of a new set when he's saying what to craft or not are the worst.
Remember Kripp saying that Dr. Morrigan would be good? Trump said otherwise and was right.
He is not always right about his reviews, but none hearthstone pro is always right
-
2
YourPrivateNightmare posted a message on Kripparian - “Hunters will be nuts!!”Posted in: General Discussionno offense, but when it comes to constructed Kripp is never the most reliable source.
If you want an opinion based on the current meta watch Trump, if you want a more generalized and optimistic review watch Kibler.
Kripp is good at evaluating arena cards, but he doesn't play enough constructed to make accurate statments.
That being said, Hunter does look very strong. So far they have received only one bad-ish card (Baited Arrow) and a whole bunch of neutral support cards. Also, there haven't been a lot of very aggressive cards that could contest hunter. Pirate Rogue might be the solution here.
Do consider however, that one the rotation comes, Hunter will be left in a very poor state as it will lose most, if not all of its current powerhouses.
-
9
Jakorindo posted a message on What's the deal with Class Fanboys in HS?Posted in: General DiscussionPersonally I have somewhat this mentality, but in reverse. I like playing all classes except druid. Druid is by far my least favorite class. I've tried, it, hated the game style. I hate how polarizing its cards feel
-
42
RAWSHUN posted a message on New Hunter Card Reveal - Revenge of the WildPosted in: News - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
5
As a Wild player, i really appreciate nerfs to both pirate decks and Raza Priest. I guess we will see if Blizzard decides Jade Druid or Cubelock are also a problem in the future.
2
After the nerf this has seen 0 play. Interesting change that could be made in my opinion is make it cost 1 less for each damage your hero has taken this game (since the card text kinda implies that, despite not working that way).
24
Well, we all know what will get nerfed: Shield Slam and Lightning Storm because balance.
3
Does Monsanto represent some kind of agricultural company focused on GMOs and chemicals?
2
So Rogue players just want broken stuff?
3
Still good.
3
Some Wild love.
3
Single handedly completed Priest quest for me. Certainly worth picking.
1
Totally forgot i have that card, gonna try him in the new expansion for sure!
7
Surprised it wasn't mentioned here - flavor text is a reference to The Terminator.