• 5

    posted a message on New Legendary Card Revealed - Siamat

    No lifesteal. So I doubt it will be

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on RIP
    Quote from yeah2see >>

    Trust me, it gets better.

     nah

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Favourite and least favourite classes?

    fuck priest

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 10 New Classic Cards, Vanish & Mind Blast to Hall of Fame

    People who somehow thought Mind blast was balanced, aka delusional priest players

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on 10 New Classic Cards, Vanish & Mind Blast to Hall of Fame

    I called that Mind Blast would be hall of famed, who's laughing now? :D

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2

    Finally some good news, Mind Blast is officially being moved to the hall of fame. I called that this would happen, it was just too strong of a card. GG Priests "We’ll be adding Vanish and Mind Blast to the Hall of Fame and replacing them with effects that better speak to their classes’ core fantasies:"

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • -1

    posted a message on ROGUES ARE GETTING NERFED! 4 Card Changes Coming May 22

    I called that nerfs would come around this time, im so good

    Posted in: News
  • 28

    posted a message on New Hearthstone Cinematic - Here’s the Plan! (Dalaran Heist Adventure)

    Oh yeah, stealing an entire city is so generic, I’m just so sick of movies and games using this theme!!! 😤😤

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2

    I thought I could have fun in the new brawl, I was sorely mistaken. I manage to mill one Shallow Graves and here I am stupidly thinking "oh, they only have one more" well I was horribly wrong, the fucker players three more along with the other bullshit resurrection spells they have and I lose. What an unfun experience, I truly hope the new solo content is not like this.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Ok, It Is Time To Nerf Warrior And Rogue.
    Quote from beppe946 >>
    Quote from beppe946>>
    Quote from WagnerCwhs>>

    The strongest classes right now, based on Winrate, are Druid and Hunter, not rogue and Warrior

     Can you please show me where you found this idiocy? Please don't tell me something on the line of "HS Replay main page"

     Why is it idiocy? It has the collected data of thousands of games, I feel as if it is far more trustworthy than someones personal opinion. Also, vS' recent data reaper report also shows that Hunter is one of the best classes, not Warrior. Rogue is one of the best, I agree with that, but Warrior isn't. https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-128/

    It is an idiocy because you can't simply vomit numbers without an actual contextualization: HS Replay's front page shows each class' overall winrate, and not just a single archetype's one. What does it mean? It mean that if I want to play Silence Rogue on ladder (trash meme deck) or even a not optimized Rogue deck, my results will still count toward the determination of the class' winrate. Do you get now why I said it was a stupid thing?
    I'm well aware of VS Meta Reports (I actually read them every Thursday) and I know that Hunter is rising in both popularity and winrate, but they also say that Druid is collapsing after the initial success (whining threads suddenly disappeared) and that Warrior (I don't know for how long, but still) keeps the silver medal.
    Moreover, how can you question Rogue's crushing supremacy in this meta? You don't need data to understand that Rogue has the upper hand in 90% of the matchup these days.
    In the end, that's my conclusion: internet is good, data is good, meta reports are great; just understand what they mean before using them as an argument in a discussion.

     If you play silence rogue, you will still get wins because of how insane rogues basic and classic set is. It may be a tad stupid system, but I feel as if it should have some attention paid to it.

    Then you should know why saying Hunter is a top class, is not idiocy. Rogue currently has the best deck according to the reaper reports, with Hunter having the second best. In legend, Murloc shaman is currently performing better than Warrior, so Warrior doesn't even deserve a medal. The fourth best class/deck doesn't exactly scream to me "I need nerfing", not sure about you.

    I didn't question Rogue's supremacy, Rogue is in a ridiculous place right now and has been for a very long time. Somehow tempo Rogue is more aggro than odd Rogue. Not sure why the original responder claimed Rogue was bad.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Ok, It Is Time To Nerf Warrior And Rogue.
    Quote from beppe946 >>
    Quote from WagnerCwhs >>

    The strongest classes right now, based on Winrate, are Druid and Hunter, not rogue and Warrior

     Can you please show me where you found this idiocy? Please don't tell me something on the line of "HS Replay main page"

     Why is it idiocy? It has the collected data of thousands of games, I feel as if it is far more trustworthy than someones personal opinion. Also, vS' recent data report also shows that Hunter is one of the best classes, not Warrior. Rogue is one of the best, I agree with that, but Warrior isn't. https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-128/

    Quote from hillandder >>

    It is crystal clear some cards is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of the balance now and need to be nerfed fast as possible.

    Dr. Boom is too much powerful for only 7 manas, nothing compares, completely deny, outlast and outvalue everything, or remove, redesign your hero powers, the mech aura or the cost of the hero, the way he is now is insanely unfair, completely unbalanced and totally broken, many classes just can do nothing about it.

    Omega Devastator is just insane, kill everything, with rush can deal alone with any mid board, the premium stats and the broken ability is out of question for the needed nerfs, increase the cost to 8 and remove mech tag, anything less is BS.

    HoF Preparation, this should be done in the very first time they created the HoF.

     I've said it before and I'll say it again, because people don't seem to get it, even someone with a Warrior profile picture, Warrior is not op. You can say he doesn't feel fun to play against or it feels too strong, but I ask you, what is fun to play against? Nothing, if you're losing. 6 classes have a deck which has a positive win rate against Bomb warrior, 6. Just because your deck isn't cutting it against Warrior, doesn't mean other decks aren't. Nothing that you listed as a complaint can be taken seriously, because Warrior is not one of the top classes right now. So it's very hard to see it as an issue.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Nerfs are not the solution- Buffs are.

    Buffs would just lead to nerfs, I don't see how this is a good solution because of that simple reason.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Avengers Endgame on its way to historic $1billion worldwide!!
    Quote from Sherman1986 >>

    Endgame sucked

    Why?

     

    Well, to begin with, Endgame completely invalidates all of the important deaths in infinity war. All of the main characters came back, so there's that. Also, none of the deaths in endgame matter a bit, because as they are doing with the black widow movie, they can just call it a "prequel" and that's that. Hell, all of the avengers could die and they would still find a way to make money from them. So for me, it's hard to become invested in these characters when I know their lives matter little to none. The three hours was not needed at all, most of it was filler or backstory that added nothing of value to the movie. 

    I think the last avengers movie was okay, mostly because I was interested in a girl who loved Marvel, but that's a story for another day. This movie however, has just sort of let me down. It's supposed to be this big ending to an epic franchise right? But it just doesn't feel like it is at all.

     

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 0

    posted a message on Avengers Endgame on its way to historic $1billion worldwide!!

    Endgame sucked

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 0

    posted a message on Does Blizzard/HS team even test the cards before the release?
    Quote from Bronzoid >>
    Quote from Bronzoid >>

    Mage has about the same amount if not more removal, why only complain about Warrior? I don't even know how you think removal is a bad thing.

     Ehhhh, what? Hell no, Mage currently doesn't even have half of it

    Mage removals are mostly spells, and most of them cost a lot, things like Flamestrike/Blizzard/Blast wave. U can count fireball as removal, add Polymorph, Shooting star, Arcane Explosion, Daring Fire Eater, Frostbolt. And that's mostly it. And again, all of these (except fire eater) are SPELLS and half aren't used that often

    Now look at CW: They have shitton of both spells AND minions with removals. Shield slams, Brawls, Warpath, Execute, Supercollider, Omega devastator, Militia commander (yes it counts, a 4 mana, deal 5 that can still survive), Dynomatic, Darius, Smolderhorn Lancer (also Slam and Devastate can be added to the list, kinda)

    And all that can be used without Dr Boom hero... After Dr boom hero is played, almost every single unit becomes removal, and Omega Assembly keeps making them more cards and removals thanks to the power of Magnetic and MAGIC NEUTRALISED 

     I just counted at least 20 removal cards for Mage. What does it matter if they're spells and expensive? It doesn't take away from the fact that they're removal. Considering that Warrior is the fourth best class currently, with no tier one decks, I fail to see how anything you just said is an issue.

     What do you mean what does it matter? Are you trolling, or you genuinely don't understand the difference between a removal spell and a removal that gives you both a minion on board and costs about the same as the analogous spell?

    Like a 4 mana chillwind yeti with a pyroblast (that, thankfully, can't hit face). Warpath can be a 4 mana blizzard or a 8 mana Flamestrike, or even more, it's flexible af. Mage removals don't even compare to powerlevel of cards like that. Mage doesn't have heals either, unlike warrior and especially current CW

     Oh, no. I understand the difference but I’m merely comparing the amount of removal, not how good it is. So in that case, it doesn’t matter. I’m not saying Mage removal is better, I’m saying that there’s much more of it. 

    Neither class really have heals, unless you count armour gain which is silly because that’s a whole different mechanic. And if you’re talking about Zilliax, it’s a neutral card, aka all classes can play it. 

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.