• 0

    posted a message on THE NEW REWARD SYSTEM IS NICE, BUT
    Quote from tripzplash >>
    Quote from KillJack >>
    Quote from user-21053594 >>
    Quote from KillJack >>

    People who are complaining about this new system are unbelievable. It’s clearly about three times more generous than the old one and far more fun... then people are whining they have to pay money in order to get further extras.

    Newsflash!! Blizzard are a business. Businesses need to make money. Would you work for free? 

     Actually this is not true, to get same gold as you get before just to finish daily quest (55g average ) now you need to play about 2h a day. Have fun then.

     I’ve played about 3 hours of standard and an hour of battlegrounds and had a legendary, three packs and ~400 gold. The fact that it gives away two legendaries makes it more valuable than the old system.

     you jokeing right??? ofc you gonna get more reward in early level once you get to level 25+ you start getting less reward then old quest reward

    Yes but don’t you realise that the amount I’ve gotten in the first three hours would probably take around a week to earn before? And that’s just the gold. The two legendaries would take months to earn the needed amount of dust with the old system. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on THE NEW REWARD SYSTEM IS NICE, BUT
     
    Quote from SudsyNutria06 >>
    Quote from KillJack >>
    Quote from SudsyNutria06 >>

    I don't disagree that the new system is an improvement, not hard to do when the old system was so poor and outdated for current Hearthstone. However, do they really need to make more money when in a year of record profit (2019) Activision Blizzard laid off nearly 800 employees? They have plenty of money. And it sure as hell isn't going to the average dev. 

     Yes they need to make more money. It’s a business not a charity.

    Stop crying. It’s how the world works.

     And perpetual financial growth is definitely a realistic goal. Sure. Allowing corporate greed like this will only fuck everyone over more in the long run. Good job defending a business that doesn't give a fuck about you ya corporate shill. 

     Of course it doesn’t give a fuck about me. 

    But again... Newsflash: That’s life. The person over the road doesn’t give a fuck about me. I don’t hold a grudge against them either. 

    Like I said before... a company’s purpose is to make money. If they don’t charge for things, they won’t make money. They are offering a service which you can choose to purchase or not. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what they’re doing and to be honest, this game gives away a lot more than most do. But yet still... whine whine whine. I have to pay for this, I have to pay for that... 

    Craziest thing is... the only things you actually HAVE to pay for are all cosmetic. People are literally complaining that they aren’t getting extra shit for free.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on THE NEW REWARD SYSTEM IS NICE, BUT
    Quote from SudsyNutria06 >>

    I don't disagree that the new system is an improvement, not hard to do when the old system was so poor and outdated for current Hearthstone. However, do they really need to make more money when in a year of record profit (2019) Activision Blizzard laid off nearly 800 employees? They have plenty of money. And it sure as hell isn't going to the average dev. 

     Yes they need to make more money. It’s a business not a charity.

    Stop crying. It’s how the world works.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on THE NEW REWARD SYSTEM IS NICE, BUT
    Quote from user-21053594 >>
    Quote from KillJack >>

    People who are complaining about this new system are unbelievable. It’s clearly about three times more generous than the old one and far more fun... then people are whining they have to pay money in order to get further extras.

    Newsflash!! Blizzard are a business. Businesses need to make money. Would you work for free? 

     Actually this is not true, to get same gold as you get before just to finish daily quest (55g average ) now you need to play about 2h a day. Have fun then.

     I’ve played about 3 hours of standard and an hour of battlegrounds and had a legendary, three packs and ~400 gold. The fact that it gives away two legendaries makes it more valuable than the old system.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 8

    posted a message on THE NEW REWARD SYSTEM IS NICE, BUT

    People who are complaining about this new system are unbelievable. It’s clearly about three times more generous than the old one and far more fun... then people are whining they have to pay money in order to get further extras.

    Newsflash!! Blizzard are a business. Businesses need to make money. Would you work for free? 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on New Druid Rare Card Revealed - Fizzy Elemental

    NEED A DRINK?!?!?

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on New Shaman Legendary Card Revealed - Grand Totem Eys'or

    So far it only buffs 10 cards in a deck, assuming you run all totems as duplicates in Totem Shaman  so I think it’d need a few more totems revealed within the set to be good. Otherwise it just feels like it’s one of those cards that needs an already wide board to be good. 

    Worth noting that turning your Totem Goliath from a 5/5 into a 6/6 isn’t too great either. 

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on New Druid Legendary Card Revealed - Greybough

    I don’t see this seeing play in a top tier deck. I do like the card though. Definitely one of the more interesting class legendaries of the set.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Should Legendary Quest cost 0 mana?
    Quote from Mcree76 >>
    Quote from Darksun200 >>

    That's kinda the point. The reward given is powerful, thus it should have a downside.

     none of the quest are even doing well in the standard meta though

    Shaman and Warlock will probably see a lot of play next expansion though and I love paladin quest so I still try to play it even though it sucks.

    It’s because the cards are over a year old. Every expansion releases more powerful cards so the Quests aren’t needed anymore. It was the same with the Ungoro quests. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How the hell does Warrior beat Priest??
    Quote from champizgz >>

    Hoard Pillager, Captain Greenskin or Doctor KrastinovUpgrade! help putting more presure in form of more bombs

     This. 

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on New Paladin Legendary Card Revealed - High Exarch Yrel
    Quote from lostkiwi >>

    Wow.

    Strongest class legendary announced so far by a long way.

    As a player who usually uses Pure Paladin to hit legend with, this card is exceptional.

    7 damage, 7 heal and a taunt unit that the opponent has to get through. However in saying that, while I am sure it will fit into every pure deck, the deck doesn't really need it. In most cases it's going to be a more expensive but lower stat'd Libram of Hope (after discounts), but with the benefit of rush.

    It does have a few other cons though:

    • This is a late game card, where often how a pure paladin can lose, is to lose the board early to a high aggressive deck (eg Hunter)
    • It gets messed up by bomb warriors, on account of the bombs counting as neutrals

     I don’t think it’s as strong as the Demon Hunter card. 

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Anyone else tired of the meta?

    What worries me is all these seemingly op aggro cards we are seeing in the new set. I don’t think much is going to change.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 5

    posted a message on New Warrior Legendary Card Revealed - E.T.C, God of Metal

    Better have some good and cheap rush cards in the set because I don’t think this is good with the current pool.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Do these new cards suck?
    Quote from Cashmeout >>

    Is it just me or is blizzard becoming less and less and less and LESS creative with their cards. So far thumbs down for me

    Must admit that the cards revealed since the original reveal have been a bit boring. Guess it’s hard to stay creative when more and more ideas are being introduced but I think the Old Gods are all pretty strong (N’Zoth maybe not so much) and will completely change the meta.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on New Warlock Rare Card Revealed - Wicked Whispers
    Quote from Thanatos2k >>

    Bad card.  Remember Mark of the Lotus?

    Wasn’t Mark of the Lotus a very good card?? I seem to remember very strong token Druid decks around that time.

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.