-
- Kanthu1158
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years, 10 months, and 7 days
Last active Sat, Apr, 4 2020 23:01:25 -
- 8
- 16
- 57
- 0 Followers
- 443 Total Posts
- 493 Thanks
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
1
0
Very well.
Dumb: Well, Fabio’s comment was arguing that aggro still beats Jade Druid and hence there is no problem. This is an easily counterable claim. The truth is, cards like Spreading Plague and Crypt Lord have solidified druid’s early game presence and antiaggro and druid now does far better against aggro, its biggest weakness, than before. Druid has thus become way better and hence more played than before. This would be an acceptable response. Instead, you cleverly countered by commenting on his profile picture.
Paranoid: After looking at his profile picture, a popular character from the massive Warcraft lore, you decided that the only reason he might like that particular character enough to define his Hearthpwn profile is because he played his Hearthstone card? Keep in mind that that art is different than the card art (and frankly worse), which means his affinity for the character stretches further than just the card itself. Also keep in mind that Fandral is a card that sees play in way more decks than just jade druid. Yet you immediately jumped to the conclusion that he has Fandral as his profile pic because he loves jade druid enough to defend it on Hearthpwn, again, despite a much better comeback available. Now maybe paranoid isn’t the right word for this, maybe somebody could help me out, but it clearly isn’t a normal train of thought.
Creepy: Oh boy. “You are a jade druid player that is not being honest.” “Someone that says silly things… to defend his beloved class.” These sentences are just gloriously cartoonish. Read it back to yourself and tell me you don’t sound like a Disney villain right now. Now I haven’t watched Game of Thrones, but I’d bet you got more than a little inspiration from Ramsay Bolton right there. Actually, scratch that. I’m sure George R.R. Martin is a better writer than this.
0
0
0
0
1
I would consider myself a shaman fanatic. I just got 1000 wins a few hours ago so I'm qualified. The first cards I crafted from KFT were Moorabi and a golden Thrall, Deathseer. I usually play reincarnate shaman, and I run this one list that I've been modifying every expansion since WotOG. Here's the most recent variation:
As it turns out, despite all common sense, Thrall, Deathseer is really good in N'zoth shaman. I had to add in a couple more synergistic minions, mainly Thing from Below, but it's been working really well since.
Btw does anybody have a good freeze shaman list? I made one with Frozen Crushers and Thrall, Deathseer, but it's not very good. I'd like to think that the archetype itself is playable and my list just sucks.
0
I love the new meta, and am hoping it doesn't settle any time soon. I'll be honest, I do wish there was more aggro, since the endless value matchups in control v. control get fatiguing after some time. Long games are great, but I also like games where I fight to stabilize against aggro within 6-7 turns. Still, there wasn't even this much deck variety just after WotOG launch so I'm happy.
Death knights are awesome, the Lich King is awesome, KFT is overall pretty awesome. If anything the only things I hate about the meta are relics from Mean Streets.
1
And people say Thrall, Deathseer is bad, hah.
1
This might sound odd coming from someone who loves playing greedy control decks, but I rather like it when there's a decent amount of aggro over this heavy control meta, provided that there's some diversity and not every aggro deck is pirate warrior. It's fun to have some quick games where you basically try to stay alive long enough for you to run out of steam and for them to run out of ammo. It helps that my main deck is pretty good against aggro. It gets fatiguing when every other game is another super greedy control and you have to constantly outvalue their five tirions/lich kings/obsidian statues over 20/30 minutes.
I'm actually hoping this meta brings back zoolock, I like always liked those matchups.
6
Where did this art come from, I don't remember ever seeing it game.
0
I think Thrall, Deathseer would shine most in a control shaman list, and more controversially, I think it would be great in N'zoth shaman despite the obvious antisynergy.
I run 2 stonehill, doomsayers, 1 Manatide totem, Hallazeal, and Barnes in my N'zoth shaman list. Several of these cards are dead in the late game or in control v control matchups, and I think they have the potential to be great when evolved. Hallazeal is great to combo with elemental destruction, but often ends up dead the next turn due to his low health, and on turn 10 I have enough Mana to evolve him into something better. Barnes is always a great card with evolve, and now if he whiffs with a Nzoth I can evolve him into a giant. Similarly the introduction of the new giant means I can evolve Nzoth into snowfury with the hero power.
I currently run charged hammer in my list so that I won't have totems get in the way of my big Nzoth turn. Now I have a better hero power, and I think I have enough minions to get serious value off it.
0
0
Huh. I actually thought Jaina was a bit too slow to see play, and I thought thrall was great. I think Malfurion is definitely one of the worse ones, really weak battlecry. Valeera might not see play, but I wouldn't bet against it.
Thrall would be on my best list just because of his cost. He has an enormous impact, and a full heal for trades, as well as the possibility to make minions better seems great to me.
Guldan is obviously insane, at the very least a little worse than N'zoth. Garrosh could be good, the weapon is definitely crazy. Uther is great, but I don't think any deck built on comboing him will work. Summoning 2/2s with soft taunt are great though and the weapon is insane.
1
Best hero card art