• 1

    posted a message on What's wrong with Casual?
    Quote from Mojomaker >>

    I see people complaining about the decks being played in casual all the time. But no one seems to have a possible solution method. I rarely play casual, so I couldn't care less tbh. But shouldn't you be able to play what you want in a mode called "casual"?

    You can play with your homebrew decks and you can also try a tier 1 deck without sweating it up in Ranked. 

    I, personally,  try my shitty decks in ranked because beating a rank 24 guy who is playing with basic cards is not fun for me. I'm not judging anyone, it's just my personal opinion. 

    So, my question is: Why is casual problematic for you? And how would you fix it?

    If it helps I started a thread with an idea on how to fix this. Anyone interested in joining the REAL casual network is welcome to post there and have some fun:

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/222850-who-wants-to-play-fairer-hearthstone

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Third Game Mode - Real Casual Play Network

    With this system only in its infancy I think we can rely on what would be widely perceived as really powerful, medium and meh. I don't think a 50% will be really really upset if they challenge a person that says they have a 60% that turns out to be more like 70%. It's more about curbing any obvious shenanigans and generally top performing decks/builds are not welcome. Even rough power ratings will be enough for a 20% to know they probably won't beat someone else's 65% and it saves them the trouble of waiting out the loss.

    You are of course welcome to take an idea from a top performing deck and build around it yourself with whatever you have on hand so long as it doesn't come too close to the super high performing/wallet version or its power level.

    I expect some people will run into things that sometimes seem more powerful than they expected: we must all understand that sometimes a memey deck like bombhunter or mill mage is going to get a great draw and blow you out. This will be up to you to reasonably judge and not just report someone because they lucked out with non-OP cards. We can't completely avoid the RNG of it all - the best we can do is give people a fighting chance so they're not queuing into the same old tourney blowout decks.

    Who knows - maybe brewers will use this system to find interactions other people haven't thought of yet.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Third Game Mode - Real Casual Play Network
    Quote from Haussenfuss >>
    Quote from Shadowrisen >>

    @ OP

    I don't accept the premise that the game is particularly unfair

    That being said, I sincerely compliment you.  Been hovering around these forums for years and this is the first proactive solution I've seen.  It's amazing to watch people post month after month after month about how other people have to change for their benefit.

    I say thee yay sir or madame

    Agreed. Congratulations to the OP for doing something constructive - though I share misgivings about criticizing the competitive play-mode for actually being competitive. If I go to the local store, intending to compete with a bunch of perfect strangers in a MtG store tourney, I know what to expect if I choose to bring my meme deck. The competitive mode in HS is no different.

    Some advice - if you are able, attend a Fireside Gathering. Meeting like-minded HS players IRL will quickly expand your Friends list to include people who want to play the game the same way you do. I have about three dozen IRL Friends in-game that I've met at FSGs - we often play "tournaments" against each other with crazy decks. Good luck to the OP.

     I don't think that I claimed it was unfair, I just thought we could make it fairer. I see fairness as a scale not a dichotomy so I think this is an incremental step towards making it fairer for those of us without a meaningful or enjoyable place in Ranked or Casual (Second Ranked).

    I also didn't criticise competitive mode for being competitive. Just the fact that people use the casual system for ranked quality decks without ladder anxiety makes it hard for the rest of us to enjoy the game. This method offers an alternative to that.

    I'm glad you touched on MTG play because as I mentioned in the first post MTG Commander players have identified deck power mismatches as a huge inhibitor for enjoyable gameplay and have begun to analyse power levels of their own decks using percentages the same way I suggested here so that Grizzly Bears isn't suddenly up against Black Lotus without knowing why first.

     

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Third Game Mode - Real Casual Play Network
    Quote from Rubinlibelle >>

    We could also make a group within the Blizzard App. And maybe we should have a codeword for challenging. I suggest "#clownfiesta". 

     That's a good idea i'll look into creating one when I get home and i'll sort out invites later. It's now almost 5pm in Sydney so it'll be a few hours til it's ready.

    Also I stupidly didn't take server into account so maybe i'll make one for each server.

     

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 25

    posted a message on New Third Game Mode - Real Casual Play Network

    Hi All

    TLDR: Come join a growing community of likeminded players looking for a proper casual environment without the risk of running into top tier tourney decks over and over.

    Set some decks aside specifically for this purpose - no top tier stuff that is plaguing casual right now. We only want meme decks, budget decks or nooby decks from restricted collections (i.e. the kinds of decks SUPPOSED to be in casual).

    THIS IS NOT A PLEA FOR BLIZZARD TO DO SOMETHING. THIS IS NOT A WHINE THREAD. THIS IS US DOING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE OURSELVES. So please kindly refrain from negative comments about how Blizzard won't listen or how casual is fine/not fine because that is not the purpose of this thread.

    Original post:

    After spending a few years barely getting to 10 in ranked due to limited cardpool and getting spanked all over Casual by top tier tourny decks  I began to wonder if we could just create a defacto third option without Blizzard's help. We would do this by creating a dedicated friends network for this purpose only using this thread as its base. Ideally it would be a truly casual environment for people wanting to play around with fun/meme decks and those without huge card collections.

    I figure that a good first step is to do what MTG Commander players do and rate your decks. Top tier decks are obviously going to be way up there from around 70% to 100% so only power levels up to 70% would be welcome.

    Obviously this is subjective and reliant on human estimates but you all know what up to 70% means so as long as nobody is a tool about it and justifying Zoolock as being 69% then we're fine. Leave the other 30% for Ranked or Casual (i.e second ranked). Then add your tag to this thread so people can add you and challenge using only decks that fit this criteria.

    This would also help the noobies that have almost no cards a lot because they could just use the 'borrow deck' function in friendslist challenge to pilot one already checked and rated by the other player.

    This would be super easy to police because you could just post screenshots of any knobs that decide to bring a fox into the henhouse with a toptier deck and they are shamed and unfriended by the people using this thread.

    If you're interested in playing fairer HS in a friendlier environment post your tag in this thread and add some other peoples'.

    Happy gaming!

    -Maverick

     

    RULES:

    1) Keep deck power under 70%. Make an educated guess.

    2) Only screenshot and post pic if someone is bringing an obviously >70% or high tier deck into these games

    3) Keep it clean - we want this to be a safe and fun environment. Keep the salt to a minimum.

    DISCORD SERVER: https://discord.gg/ry3PJK

    (permanent link now)

    NA BATTLETAGS:

    Maverick#1405

    DZMarcos#1460

    Clocky#11704

    Daulphas#1344

    Colinthepyro#1135

    Richard#11558

    Dragonsnack#1798

    MightyOwl#165587

    Lellyo#1192

    Chocoman79#1219

    Strongholde#1594

    Gonza#2466

    ManThighs#1147

    xSnP#1700

    EyeCantSee#11337

    R3N3G4D3#1601

    Silentstorm#192428

    BadCompany#11375

    Nicodemus300#1588

    Magitact#1132

    EU BATTLETAGS:

    dragonsscars#2148

    Rubinlibelle#2843

    SilMeyster#2787

    Iustin#2239

    Hegarmin#2217

    ilja615#2558

    PinkiePieYay#21852

    Rachel2206#2977

    Peace4ever#2698

    Vasiiilvasil#2795

    ziombalaboms#2785

    Jody#2424

    Nightknight21#223723

    Barnacle#2775

    Echo#11883

    Stock#21764

    Энский#2544

    Nizart#2655

    Evilyoshi#21564

    Madea#2701

    Raun#2694

    Saltybuckets#1922

    ASIA BATTLETAGS:

    Luckyjack#1848

     

    EDITS:

    - New and improved - added Discord server and battletag lists

    - Deleted deck rating system - too many people asking me how to estimate a deck's power out of 100. Just tell people what you're playing.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Tavern Aggro - Zoolockiseum

    I don't know why I expected anything different.

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.