Hearthpwn

Well, Bardles already guessed the bartender, about 2 pages ago (Can't blame you for missing that one)

A (presumably Gadgetzan) card, outside of the three families of Gadgetzan.  Has a fixation on drinks, it seems and might be making some kind of appearance in the new expansion.

Or, Mayor Noggenfogger.

He's a major player in Gadgetzan, outside of the families.  His card image features a vial of something, and the golden animation sees him flipping a coin. (Counterfeit?)

Overall, he seems as good a guess as anything.

Well, this sure seems like a kooky puzzle.

Kooky Chemist?

Okay, so we've got strong Gadgetzan imagery, Sally as in Sergeant Sally, presumably, counterfeit coins, crooks, and a city.

So, suppose we're working with a Gadgetzan card.  We've got references to the goons in the first Stanza (Sergeant Sally again, and 'Pally')  It seems we're dealing with one of the families, or someone who's like, a safe place between them.

The second stanza sounds a lot like the Jade Lotus.

So, it sounds like we're talking about the Kabal?

In which case, Kazakus would be trying to get you to try his drink?

No idea what's up with the gratuitous german, though.  Can't think of any particularly german cards.

An elemental, it sounds like.  Doesn't see play.  Seems pretty heavy hitting. Cost is even.
Well, the only place where elementals and Baku both see play is in mage, which should remove the chance of shaman elementals, like Kalimos.

That in mind, I'll have to go with Cauldron Elemental.  Puts a good twist on 'slow burning,' too.

Quote from Elvaeyn >>

Holy shit I think I just got it:

is it Call in the Finishers?

It's the same as Fiendish Circle,which is from Witchwood and summons demons instead of murlocs

 And there you have it, folks!

Same card, but with demons instead of murlocs, from the witchwood.  Text is exactly 1 word off.  Same mana, same stats (4 mana, 4/4 of stats).  Razor wire is very mob-like, which is fitting for a Gadgetzan card.  It's name pretty much does mean kill.

Your crucial assumption was that it was a minion, when it was in fact a spell.

That said, over to you, Elvaeyn

If you guys want to give up, I'm perfectly fine with that.  Or, if you'd prefer another clue, that's also an option.  I guarantee you have the materials to get the correct answer, though.

You're making one crucial assumption that's really screwing you over.

Alright, time for another clue, I think.  This should pretty well draw things to a close.

Make the wrong people mad, draw the higher-ups' ire,
And your neck might get met, with some sharp razor wire.
And you want to live on?  It's not likely you will,
For my name's a command, and it's one that means kill!

Sneaky devil and blood imp ain't quite from the right places, Foss (specifically, the forest).  I'll add this one, though.  The cards I'm referring to have the same mana cost as well.

Quote from HunkyPupser >>

Quote from Quinjin >>

Loatheb and Rebuke

 Dammit, was just coming back to say that :-/

 It is not those two.

Hunky Pupser is on the right path (through the woods, as it were), but seems to be having trouble locating the match.

Quote from HunkyPupser >>

Rusty Recycler

That is not it, as it's newer than anything it might be referring to.

However, if you were, in fact, referring to Felsoul Inquisitor, you're on the right track on one major point, but I should mention that the stats are identical.

These are all very close to matching the clues, and they're all off on the exact same point.

Which is to say, it is not Twilight drake.

It is neither.

'While you've done very well, finding similar cards,
You've missed out, I would say, on just one major part,
So please call me up, when you've finished a walk,
Then circle on back, and we'll see what you've got.'

That's close, but not quite devilish.

There's a copy of me, with a devilish twist,
Which is fresher than me (from the forest it is)
And you'd say 'those are different?'  and you'd probably scoff,
for our text's 1:1, just a single word off.