Hearthpwn

Quote from Turalyon71 >>

I enjoy playing hearthstone more than ever because of the diversity and the many choices, meta has never been that good, if you exclude secret paladin, many decks and classes are viable. 

I only don't like the fact that every expansion has so few viable cards and that is annoying for me

when i started playing hearthstone February of last year i was hooked for quite a while and it was ridiculous fun. As a newbie thats probably hard to conceive simply because i imagine anyone has started playing the game within the last 3-4 months would be frustrated or at least as frustrated as i am with how the game is now. simply put, the games pre TGT were usually decided by skill or at least some semblance to skill; where as now they are decided by a mere coinflip and who has the stronger rng "skills". like even facehunter as the standard eboladin or mech mage werent as aggravating as the meta for the past 3-4 seasons, simply cuz: 1) u werent seeing aggro decks every 4/5 games. 2) u didnt have to worry about rng so much as they werent that huge a factor. 3) even if ur opponent curved like a god u could still have a chance at winning due to the game mechanics. now not so much, if ur opponent curves his 1st 2-3 turns u might as well concede cuz the games already decided.

Honestly speaking i wouldnt recommend HS to anyone based on where the game is right now. while its true that aggo decks are generally cheap and easy to play so new players can pick up the game easier.....but then again that is part of the problem. more and more new players join the game and see aggro decks running rampant and unstoppable, so they pick it up cuz its easy to do. and that leaves the players that dislike aggro decks to start wanting to play aggro decks because they are being beaten way too easily with little effort by these same decks that like 80% of the community are playing hence the term "cancer".

so honestly the game was alot more fun before tgt and loe, at least for me it was. but i guess everyone cannot and will not like the same things, some ppl like 2 minute games, some ppl like 15 minute games and thats fair and diverse. but what i hate about herathstone is that when a deck that is geared to last/win a 15 minute game will lose regardless of time to decks that are geared to win in 2 minutes kinda makes me wonder why some cards and deck concepts exist. like why have controllish cards that are 100% going to lose to aggroish cards regardless of what they are being played in? they just have no reason to exist imo. game not fun anymore, i play this game nowadays out of sheer determination and guilt cuz i was foolish enough to buy every expansion and even wasted a lil on some packs.

wish i was 11 months smarter :(

Quote from IHaveCards >>

 as long as mysterious challenger exists, "diversity" will not exist in Hearthstone's vocabulary

Garrosh vs. Uther....Uther....Uther.....Uther....Uther......Uther..................................

....................Uther!

jesus fkn christ u guys cant play something else? i mean am not complaining that they op as its a fair matchup... but goddammit where is the diversity?!?!?!?

Quote from s2mikey >>

Priests suck rotten as.  Fuck you and your Chicken shit Entomb card.  Go fuck yourselves, faggot Priests.

Quote from Idwiz >>

I swear sometimes I think the random match-making is trolling me. 

Quote from LeviathanHS >>

Why is Blizzard constantly giving Zoo more broken fucking tools in EVERY EXPANSION AND ADVENTURE? It is the most unskilled and broken deck in the game, it has always been. The deck everyone points out to absolute newbies "Oh play Zoo it is really easy and powerful". Like what the fuck, power should be based in skill and not in a broken hero power and available class cards. 

Zoo was already the strongest deck pre-Naxx, but Blizzard has given them something in every expansion so far. 
For instance why did the even make Imp-losion? It is not like Zoo struggled with having minions on board. But to give them both exemplary removal AND more minions is just retarded.

Imp Gang Boss. WHY WAS THIS CARD GIVEN TO WARLOCK? Did they need a 3 drop? No they already had the perfectly balanced Harvest Golem. Imp gang Boss is almost always AT LEAST a 3/5 as it always spawns an imp (which synergizes with Knife Juggler). This card against classes that can't deal at least 4 damage is stupid. Run 2 2 attack minions into it and it turns into a 3 mana 4/6.

Retarded deck, retarded class.
 

Quote from The6thDangerZone >>

Die in a hole paladin players. You're all cunts. I hope you all get ebola, cancer and leprosy at the same time. You worthless shiteating fucking cunts. Fuck you.

Quote from Dog_with_a_beer >>

That's what I mean... are you choosing to disconnect (or concede, it's more or less the same thing... they get a win either way) or does something about them roping cause you to unintentionally disconnect glitch style?

Ice Block in any deck does more than just killing the enemy and it was not intended solely for that purpose. anyone who has ever played ice block in any kind of deck will tell u otherwise.

in most cases ice block becomes a deterrent to all-ins as if they suspect that ur secret is an ice B, they have to play carefully as to not leave themselves exposed to ur army of minions that ur building, or the barrage of spells u may be stacking. On the other hand ice B can act as a bait that will singlehandedly win u the game on the spot, as it guarantees 2 lives for which they have to spend resources into killing. The latter is achieved easily by luring them to think popping the block is necessary for them setting up lethal the following turn only to be faced with Brann Bronzebeard + Antique Healbot combo and they are back to square 1.

So ur point about ice B being terrible is slightly invalid my friend, as can be seen by the huge amount of downvotes present on ur comment.

cheers.

Quote from Dog_with_a_beer >>

 What? Why would you concede if you know they're gonna lose? I understand the roping being annoying and I don't enjoy when people do it on purpose but I'm having trouble understanding why you'd opt for "I'm gonna beat you... unless you piss me off, then I'll let you win"

Sorry, I'm not trying to harp on you as I know this is a salt thread... I'm just genuinely curious as to why that would be your decision.

fuck the community of this game man.

Stupid motherfuckers know they gonna lose and they fkn sit there and watch the screen roping every turn doing nothing until i finally disconnect and they get a free win.

fucking cunt ass fucks wasting time for everyone for no fkn reason.

Good job u won a game by being the asshole of all assholes. well done, am proud of u, u fuckwads.

decided to give the ol' control warrior a spin.

Queue into 5 warlocks out of 5 games, 2 handlock 1 RenoLock and 2 Zoo.

FeelsBadMan.

"but I feel like there's a few things that could be tweaked."

Bro, u just changed 8 cards..........8 CARDS!

I do however agree on the Drakonids tbh, i dont even know why they are there. I took them out for a belcher and harrison, and it worked really well.

Quote from MechBearCat >>

"A treasure Golbin appears instead of your opponent",  why so tame? Make the treasure Goblin appear as a minion in any game (including ranked), and let both players try to kill it! In ranked the outcome of the match could always end in a draw by default, so players don't have to choose between spending resources on winning the game or killing the Goblin.

It would also add the chaotic *omg now now nowwww!!!!!* feeling, especially since you also need your opponent to cooperate.