Hearthpwn

I have hit legend with even shaman the for the June and July seasons (didn't want to push this season) in under 140 games. I could totally coach you, I'd consider myself pretty good due to the fact that I'm 19-5 in the mirror. I will admit a few of the wins were lucky devolves, but the raw data is right. I find it interesting that you have a good time vs. renolock, that and big priest were the decks that I stuggled the most, (renolock seemed to always have nuts) but druid, mirror, and pallys were eZ wins for me. I play on NA, feel free to add me Jaybaseball1#1802

Edit: no offense, but your list looks terrible to me, I run completely different cards, I made my own list out of personal preferences.

Quote from schammo >>

Uninteractive basicly means decks, that do not care for the plan of the enemy. That does not necessarily mean they are OP or that those uninteractive decks always win (that might be the case in certain matchups, though). For example: Freeze Mage vs Control Warrior is an infamous matchup of uninteractivity. Freeze mage only has a certain amount of face damage that control warriors easily exceeded quite early. That meant a winrate of up to 90%.

A current example is Quest Rogue: No matter what you play, his game play is always the same. Recent aggro decks are not uninteractive if you compare them to the classic face decks such as Mage or Hunter some years ago that truly did not care what the enemy played (unless it was taunt). Combo decks sometimes tend to be uninteractive, especially when they have good draws. A Combo deck winning on turn 6 is hardly interactive. This especially becomes obvious in mirrors of the same Combo decks. Yeah, there are variants, but they basicly just aim to draw their combo earlier. That is all about the card draw luck and not a tad bit about skill.

 I completely agree with you on most points, but I feel a bit different about your examples. I play Ad Nauseum in MTG, and that deck literally defines uninteractive. All you do is cycpe to get your combo and win. Topsy Turvy (which I play now) feels very similar in which you draw and only really have screams to interact. However, in a super polarized matchup (what you are describing), it's not necessarily ''uninteractive" because the player is still in the game, and for quest rogue example, the control player is still trying to apply pressure and clear/dirty rat out the minion or whatever. While I agree with you that this is pretty uninteractive, it's not as uninteractive as a combo deck just drawing it's combo faster than the opponent can kill them.

Sorry for such long post, not trying to shut you down or anything, just my two cents.

Remember when ranks 25-15 were all basic cards? Now all netdecks 20 down.

 No... Scroll down...

Quote from Bee >>

Quote from Kaladin >>

150 cap per day would be too much imo because then you could just load up two accounts and farm a free arena entrance every day.  

 and so what ?

Unless it's there to prevent bots from taking over

 Exactly what it's there for lol

Yay! Another druid post!

The one time I can pull off the top turvy combo, internet crashes .. wonderful. Queue again and it's an odd paladin... IN CASUAL

Edit: also full golden ;/ rly

I'ma auto include Mana wraith in all my decks now even tho I've never faced one yet... Feelsprettygoodman?

Not

Tried it, is decent, but doesn't druid do it better? I draw a lot of duds with this 

I lost 22 games in a row at rank 3 last season... Idk was rly tired but kept playing bc idk

I was thinking the same idea for Saronite Chain Gang, glad they did the same as I wished.

Now that Druid class got nerfed, I feel the class will become weak again, but it deserved it I guess. Maybe the class find another way around when a new cards come for Druid.

Good job Blizzard!

Now that Kingsbane deck is nerfed can we nerf Gluttonous Ooze?

Great news, I actually never liked kingsbane rogue and odd paladins. But after this nerf all ladder will be absolutely full of hunters.

Wild growth will be still good card in druids. But druids are loosing best turn5 ever, thats sad. I think that nourish will be playable just as "one of"

Um guys kingsbane is now unplayable. 

Omg, they are listening <3. They really made leeching poison this turn only. Wow.

I was about to leave the game but this is cool. Cool cool.

Soo, Kingsbane is half Dead. More burgle themed spectral deck might still be a thing tho. Odd Paladin lost a lot of power. Shudderwock lost a lot as well they wont get 1 mana shudder that Easy anymore. 

For druid. It is druid they still have crazy armor gain and shit. But they are missing turn now. Which can open the possibility of Keleseth for druids actually

A bit sad to have just crafted kingsbane. But I get 80 dust back I guess :(

The meta needed shaking up. Not sure that no hunter related nerf should have been included. 

Druid nerfs seem to be overkill considering ultimate infestation is rotating. Kind of strikes at class identity. 

Quote from RAGEdarky >>

WTF ARE U OING BLIZZARD SMALL INDIE COMPANY

 more like big indie company, im really happy to see rouge not fully heal herself each turn. 

Gamechanging in both formats. Really out of left field but couldn't be happier!

I've been playing since May 2015 and I don't think I've ever played more then 5 games in Wild since it got introduced.. I started dusting with most epic/legendary cards for classes/archetypes that I never played, but by now I dusted almost all rare/epic/legendary cards that I had - The only regret I have is how I spent some of the dust impulsively on certain cards.

Not having certain wild cards does make some of the solo content a lot more challenging, but thats trivial in my case atleast :)

TL;DR: If you dont spend money on card packs and never play wild: theres really not much harm in dusting that stuff, as its collecting dust in my collection anyway (pun intended ^^)