My theory: Up until yesterday this card (1) summoned boom bots or (2) put bombs in you opponents deck. Bliz realized that was insane and changed at the least minute to armor gain. Hence the image not matching the text and the terrible card consistent with Blizzard over-nerfs
- Jasteer
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years, 8 months, and 20 days
Last active Fri, May, 31 2019 06:35:26 -
- 1
- 10
- 34
- 0 Followers
- 76 Total Posts
- 133 Thanks
-
73
YJHS2000 posted a message on New Warrior Card - Dr. Boom's SchemePosted in: Card Discussion -
52
Maximal_HS posted a message on New Warrior Card - Dr. Boom's SchemePosted in: Card Discussion4 turns for it to become Iron Hide for 4 mana. This got to be one of the worst cards ever printed.
-
17
scout1515 posted a message on New Warrior Card - Dr. Boom's SchemePosted in: Card DiscussionWhy would anyone play this over shield block?
Pretty terrible card. Also the art is terrible considering it's an armor gain card..
-
26
RichardSRocha posted a message on New Warrior Card - Dr. Boom's SchemePosted in: Card DiscussionCard art has nothing to do with its effect. Bombs = armor?
-
14
RispyCrisp posted a message on Card reveals this week!!?? :DPosted in: General Discussion5 teaser videos per card is what I heard...
-
26
1xbenx1 posted a message on New Neutral Legendary - Chef NomiPosted in: Card DiscussionYou can play this and Myra's in the same turn with Prep for what that's worth.
And we've seen things like Dragon Caller Alana be played (and often at the literal end of the game).
So I wouldn't count this card out right away. -
27
SunbleachedAngel posted a message on People with OP decks who play in CasualPosted in: Standard FormatBecause I can play whatever I want wherever I want
-
5
CrusaderRO posted a message on People with OP decks who play in CasualPosted in: Standard FormatIt's easy. People want that extra chance of facing a meme deck, thus increasing their chances for a win, thus lowering the time needed to finish quests and/or get more gold.
The issue is not with them but with the hypocrites from Blizzard that do not want to improve the game and both lower the time investment needed for some things AND restrict certain cards from casual (like i.e. Most epics and legendaries).
-
25
mawmaw1785 posted a message on People with OP decks who play in CasualPosted in: Standard FormatTo test out playing unfamiliar decks to see how they play without affecting rank.
-
8
Joker_2k19 posted a message on Togwaggle = Godwaggle in new expansion??Posted in: Fan Creations - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
3
Your self-disciple to not spend that is incredible, and I salute you for that fact alone.
1
So... if there are so many decks in the past that "Ruined" this game, why are there still so many players playing it and so many twitch players being watched?
2
10
Do you want Pirate Cancer, cause crafting Patches is how you get Pirate Cancer!
17
Anyone who buys into physical card games will notice on the back of the pack, in small text, the odds of opening certain rarities and premium cards. This is not a new concept, its about time it was added to virtual products.
5
I would sit tight and see how this kind of deck performs. Everything is so new, that the top tier decks are still being figured out. The card is an excellent combo piece, but right now, I do not know of any other major deck using it.
-5
Wait a second...
Are those Neutral Spells?
Edit:
Nope - my bad - I confuse the neutral card frame with the druid one. For a second, I thought they gave us something very interesting and new. Well, not that they arn't interesting and...
I'll just shut up now... Move along.
4
If you ever played Brann with Paladin Dragon, you can chain Dragon Consorts for 1 mana each.
4
Opens up the possibility of Dragon decks in other classes.
1
I love this.
Yo Dog, heard you like Medivh, so we put Medivh as a card, so when you play Mage, you can play Medivh while playing as Medivh...
The best part if if you cast a spell with an 8 cost, you could summon another Medivh with the staff.