No, that would make him to klunky... three might be ok, but Zephrys is mostly played reactively or for a big win. So if you flood your board with all your big minions, and do not leave anything for after a board whipe it is more your fault, than anybody elses. Yes, his immensive burst damage can be frustrating, but it sometimes also is quite fun. And Highlander is a restriction one should not underestimate.
Is it just me, or do the new Priest cards and buffed Priest cards also feel like an enormous buff for Zephrys? 4Mana destroy a big board, 4Mana, whipe a small board and gain 2 health, 8Mana amazing spot removal. I really like that. Makes controll Highlander decks far more viable agains aggro or (em)big(en Druid) decks.
When i re roll it never gives a "Play 3 games as 'hero' but today it gave me a "play 3 games as either mage warrior or druid". I don't have any of those decks so how am i to complete it?
Maybe build a deck of one of these clases? I mean, it does not tell you to win them, does it? you just have to play without conceiding.
I have a feeling, that Blizzard changed their daily Quest system. Up until 2 days ago I kind of only got 60g Quests. There was an occasional 50g one, but when I rotated it, I got a new 60g Quest. But since yesterday I got 2 50g Quests, rotated both and only got 50g Quests as replacements. Just an unlucky coincidence, or did anybody else experience this? Did Blizzard change the Quests again, but this time without telling, because you'll get less gold out of it?
That would actually be pretty cool, especially since it seems that Blizzard has dropped Murlocs for Warlocks.
Dude, what are you talking about? Demon Hunters already have a murloc: Furious Felfin. -.-
For an Archetype to form, one needs both member cards and support cards. All classes have Beasts, but only Hunter and Druid can do more with them.
Yes, and the sky is blue, thanks for letting me know... -.- I was just pointing out that you obviously missed the fact Demon Hunters already have a murloc in their aresenal, that's all. You didn't mention anything about murlocs in the opening post, which clearly demonstrates that.
Or maybe I didn't mention it as it has no relevance as it hardly constitutes an archetype? You honestly come off as kinda rude here, despite this being just a fun thread.
You were also surprised when Garmondil mentioned murlocs...
Do you really know what is rude? Being a dishonest person, my friend. And yes, such a thing even applies on the internet.
1. I would agree, that you are the rude one here.
2. One single minion does not make an archetype. Otherwhise dragons would be just as plausible.
3. I do not see any dishonesty here. Not having that minion in mind, or just not considering it to build up to a new archetyp ain't dishonest at all.
I really do think that the lack of deck slots is one of the truly shameful aspects of the game right now. 7 years in, I'd like to think that they can make the game a little more player friendly in that regard. I think it would be nice to simply click on a class, and have 5 to 10 slots available - a Renolock, and Handlock, Zoo, janky discard stuff, lackeys, some wild mech Locks, for example. I'm sure a lot of people end up playing the same decks over and over because they just don't to eliminate a deck that kind of works to make a new one that might not.
That is exactly my thought and problem. I would love to try and play tons of interesting decks, without the hustle of deleting and rebuilding them everytime. But the way it is right now I always just have space for maybe 2 or 3 decks without deleting my ranked decks. And when one of the janky ones is really fun and I want to keep it that takes another spot from the "space to try something new" list.
Happy that I am not the only one who thinks this is a really big but dumb issue that Blizzard could easily fix in any given patch.
Does anybody know, why we only get 18 slots for constructing our decks? I do not think it would be that difficult to give us just some more slots, so you can have several decks of every class at the same time. There are easy 3 standart archetypes per class at any given time + wild + the new 10th class, so that you can't even have 2 decks of every class simultaniusly + decks you might just want to create for one special pve fight.
And while we are at it, couldn't it be made a little easier to rearange your build decks? I think it is not nessesary to always put your collection into wild first, and then revert it to standart in the right order. Why not implement a drag and drop possibility?
Thanks for the feedback to all of you. I also think the possibility of this going to happen is close to zero, but one can still dream. xD
But who knows... maybe someone close to Blizzard sees this threat and thinks of it as a brilliant idea and brings it up to someone able to make it reality.
Some people would just play in this mode and never craft any card if they don't care about constructed. Good idea but no, never gonna happen.
I do not see an issue with that. These people would propably never invest a single cent into the game anyways, because they just lack the competitive spirit. This means there would not be a loss for blizzard.
0
sure, that's why other cards already gave back full dust value...
2
for some reason I can't dust my dragoncaster for 100, only for 20... anybody else having that problem? other cards dusted just fine.
1
No, that would make him to klunky... three might be ok, but Zephrys is mostly played reactively or for a big win. So if you flood your board with all your big minions, and do not leave anything for after a board whipe it is more your fault, than anybody elses. Yes, his immensive burst damage can be frustrating, but it sometimes also is quite fun. And Highlander is a restriction one should not underestimate.
0
Is it just me, or do the new Priest cards and buffed Priest cards also feel like an enormous buff for Zephrys? 4Mana destroy a big board, 4Mana, whipe a small board and gain 2 health, 8Mana amazing spot removal. I really like that. Makes controll Highlander decks far more viable agains aggro or (em)big(en Druid) decks.
1
Maybe build a deck of one of these clases? I mean, it does not tell you to win them, does it? you just have to play without conceiding.
2
With all the people experiencing the same, I would not say that.
If Blizzard changed quest rates, I am fine with that. It is only fair after the new dublicate rule. But they should have announced it.
0
hopefully not permanently...
8
I have a feeling, that Blizzard changed their daily Quest system. Up until 2 days ago I kind of only got 60g Quests. There was an occasional 50g one, but when I rotated it, I got a new 60g Quest. But since yesterday I got 2 50g Quests, rotated both and only got 50g Quests as replacements. Just an unlucky coincidence, or did anybody else experience this? Did Blizzard change the Quests again, but this time without telling, because you'll get less gold out of it?
2
1. I would agree, that you are the rude one here.
2. One single minion does not make an archetype. Otherwhise dragons would be just as plausible.
3. I do not see any dishonesty here. Not having that minion in mind, or just not considering it to build up to a new archetyp ain't dishonest at all.
0
That is exactly my thought and problem. I would love to try and play tons of interesting decks, without the hustle of deleting and rebuilding them everytime. But the way it is right now I always just have space for maybe 2 or 3 decks without deleting my ranked decks. And when one of the janky ones is really fun and I want to keep it that takes another spot from the "space to try something new" list.
Happy that I am not the only one who thinks this is a really big but dumb issue that Blizzard could easily fix in any given patch.
0
well ok... can't see that to be honest :D
1
Does anybody know, why we only get 18 slots for constructing our decks? I do not think it would be that difficult to give us just some more slots, so you can have several decks of every class at the same time. There are easy 3 standart archetypes per class at any given time + wild + the new 10th class, so that you can't even have 2 decks of every class simultaniusly + decks you might just want to create for one special pve fight.
And while we are at it, couldn't it be made a little easier to rearange your build decks? I think it is not nessesary to always put your collection into wild first, and then revert it to standart in the right order. Why not implement a drag and drop possibility?
Would appreciate others insight on this.
0
Thanks for the feedback to all of you. I also think the possibility of this going to happen is close to zero, but one can still dream. xD
But who knows... maybe someone close to Blizzard sees this threat and thinks of it as a brilliant idea and brings it up to someone able to make it reality.
0
I do not see an issue with that. These people would propably never invest a single cent into the game anyways, because they just lack the competitive spirit. This means there would not be a loss for blizzard.
0
I do have some friends playing hearthstone which I actually know, but I usually am the one whos decks are borrowed for that reason.