fuck priests
- Honourspell
- Registered User
-
Member for 9 years, 4 months, and 16 days
Last active Sat, Sep, 17 2016 13:41:13 -
- 2
- 9
- 29
- 1 Follower
- 341 Total Posts
- 236 Thanks
-
4
Venetyk posted a message on What if you could choose one class not to face in Ranked?Posted in: General Discussion -
1
Baron_Von_Teapot posted a message on So I'm kind of stuck...Posted in: General DiscussionFor my part I like Troggy. He's useful if not greatly so. I know Malorne has high damage potential, but Sneed can have so much more. I would drop him in place of Malorne, honestly. Hell, he might die and turn INTO Malorne. or, like last time someone killed my Sneed, he might end up as Deathwing.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
oh that hunter card. thats what i want, smart aggro instead of constant face aggro.
1
there is a statistic i call "cardsquish"
cardsquish is the value of combining cards, due to the nature of needing to draw less cards to try, and have more cards in deck. there is no set cardsquish amount, but it should always be an increase. protector is like a nullifier +2 mark of the wilds (6/9 vs 5/10 pretty close) that is 3 cards in one, with a cost of 8. if no-attack cancels cardsquish that is still 2 mana too cheap. and then there is the inherent value of a taunt who will either take a massive number of creeps or a black knight to kill, and nothing else.
with such a massive pool necessary to replicate this i think if you made it a 10 mana legendary it would still be too stronk.
1
i think it should not recharge, rather be something you build up, then use up. i also think there should be a warlock demon who eats all your apexis and buffs itself based on apexis eaten. i think this may be an incredibly cool idea.
also 2 questions: 1 where does the name apexis come from? 2 what makes apexis creatures apexis?
1
goddamned priests. as a druid main i know its priests.
1
not to burst your bubble but... BRM is gonna have 2 cards per class, one common and one rare... so you need one more.
1
i went with hemet, not only because he is bad in general, but they passed up the option to make him a stronger big game hunter. a bigger game hunter if you will (that would probably be broken yes)
2
this... this is beutiful... it uses troggzore...its all ive ever wanted out of a deck design...now i just need boom and alex.
1
nah, for me its either "i misplayed" "i drew poorly" or "GODDAMNED PRIESTS!!!"
1
as a taunt druid main i agree with this claim for one reason: i had no idea until about a month before undertaker nerf that facehunter was considered powerful.
2
i run something like this but i realized something: i only need one innervate. having two i would always end up drawing both as my "out of cards need to top-deck" draws. having one allows decent plays, but you are much less likely to end up having a useless innervate in hand.
i may just be insane/stupid/bad though, but it works for me.