Hearthpwn

24 hour time is quickly becoming the global standard, you should probably learn it, it's not difficult.

1. They're only adding 25 new ranks for new players, not 50.

2. Low ranks are very fast to rank through, especially with winstreaks, it should take a few hours on average.

Quote from Bathduck11 >>

My phone literally can't fit this patch.... I am not f2p, ive spent a decent amount of money here and now I can't even open my game anymore.... I've not got 1 other game on my phone, and I've deleted loads of stuff. Guess I don't play hearthstone anymore... 

And no, it's not a phone problem, my phone is very up to date. This is just ridiculous 

 MicroSD cards are cheap these days, you should get one.

Rogue spells have to be overcosted because prep is still in standard, it's as simple as that.

"I don't think Rogues can fit this in their decks atm"

People always seem to forget every single set release that new archetypes are a thing pretty frequently. Evaluating cards as though the meta won't change at all has always made people look stupid.

Congratulations, this is one of the worst threads on this hellsite. No, conceding has never been poor sportsmanship. Yes, there is sometimes a delay on conceding when the game processes queued actions. Yes, you're a moron for thinking people concede more now than they used to based on literally no evidence.

Quote from badhank14 >>

I want to be excited for this.  But we don't know all the features or functions.  We all want to ask a bunch of questions, but none of them will be answered right now.  I think thats the focus of many here and their frustration.

For example,

1.  is there a cost involved, whether gold or money?  can this be setup by the tournament organizer?

2.  will there be a tournament organizer?  how much customization will they have?

3.  what features will be available from the start?  besides 'middle of the year', when will this be rolling out?

4.  will there a place to provide feedback that will actually get listened to by the hearthstone team, since it is a beta afterall?

5.  will arena tournaments be available?  'sealed' deck tournaments?  team formats?  best of 3 or 5?

6.  if bans are not included in the first iteration, when will this happen and how long will this go on?

7.  if tournaments mean different things to different people, where is the poll or feedback session in which people provide you with 'free' ideas?  you dont even have to pay for a brainstorming session, people will gladly throw you ideas for free.

8.  Wild tournaments as well as banning or restricting certain cards would be great.  Will this be a feature too?  For example, if you wanted a standard tournament in which you banned 3 cards to spice up the metagame.

So yeah, I want to know more.  But will have to wait.

Quote from EvillSquirrell >>

put a limit of 20 battle cry is not small, you have infinity battle cry, so 20 is a seriuos Nerf 

Quote from melheor >>

While at it, can you also double the animation speed of Spreading Plague? It's unbearably slow.

Quote from Yaroslav89 >>

 

Quote from psykechan >>

I can't wait to beat up on Duskfallen Aviana as punishment for getting her as my first witchwood legendary.

 

 Is it live? How long till release?

 

how many dislikes can my comment get? 

Here's what I imagine went through Brode's mind when he decided to announce this: "Hmm, community might get upset that we haven't (or couldn't) reveal any more cards yet, I think it should help calm things down and give the community something to be excited about, it's the least I could do  for them"

Community's reaction: "You idiot! Why are you wasting time on this instead of showing us more cards???"

I believe there's a phrase that says "the common man's a fool" (refering to the community).

Roses are red

These festivals are lit

But why, oh why,

is warlock so shit?

At least these 'adventures' will still have some gain for us, as apposed to being some flavour add-ons. Free packs!

And from the way Brode was talking it certainly sounds like the adventure is going to be more than 'some shitty missions'. For example they have a 'team' working on it, and it will also be releasing 'alongside' the expansion  as apposed to 'with' or 'in addition to'. That second one might be stretching a bit but still, it seems promising.

And as for Adventures being 'f2p friendly' as a f2p player I found it the other way around. Sure it was easier to get Emperor Thaurissan than it would be to craft a legendary, but at the same time the amount of commons like Tomb Pillager or Blackwing Corruptor that were integral to certain archetypes and also extremely expensive really ruined the game for me. It's definitely easier to buy a pack than to spend 3500 gold on a common.

Better than Trogg Beastrager because having a beast on the board is easier than having one in hand. Especially considering beasts summoned from spells can be adapted but not buffed in the hand. Hunter Auto-Include.

Press f to pay respect to pirate decks 

Quote from steamedmilk >>

Before anyone asks Shifting Shade - So it costs less helping the priest legendary quest, isn't played on turn 4 where a 3 health minion trades really badly and has elemental tag which we assume will be useful this expansion. 

Why would you ever play shifting shade now which is why I view this as power creep. Will it be played? Hard to say with so many cards left to reveal but it is definitely better than Shifting Shade.

They definitely didn't post that information. Nope, not at all.

You will be tested at every turn, but worry not—our fearless guides will be streaming on both Twitch and Facebook live!