So whats the problem? Easy wins, easy ladder ranks. Im not sure about this, but if a win grants you bonus xp you get more than them. So i think it‘s win/win :D
Some people play to... you know... enjoy gameplay and challenge.
10
So whats the problem? Easy wins, easy ladder ranks. Im not sure about this, but if a win grants you bonus xp you get more than them. So i think it‘s win/win :D
Some people play to... you know... enjoy gameplay and challenge.
1
All of them seem to be mediocre to bad so far.
Fast metagames are just not good for slow 10-cost minions.
2
I've recently started playing duels but I think around 50% of my games are against Mozaki, and certainly almost all of my losses. Is this class just completely busted? The hero power makes any kind of swarm tactic pointless (e.g. discard lock) and god forbid they get passives like band of bees.
1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyqWTqlAuyQ&feature=youtu.be
I am very mad not also for the lie but for the Hearthstone's price.
Pre-order + Pass + middle pre-order every 4 months. Hearthstone can cost 100€ every 4 months, so 400€ per year without having the full collection. Blizzard is mad.
TIL that 100x3 = 400
-1
millock is gonna win in turn 6-7 mark my words.
blizzard doesnt know the monster its created
23
As a Control player I have to say that yet again, aggro will absolutely dominate the meta in less than 1 week. DH will be able to kill you in just 4-5 turns now with all these new weapons and attack cards. It's absolutely disgusting to take more than 15 damage in the face on Turn 5. You just can't avoid it. There is not enough healing, or removal or taunts to stop that. It kills all the fun of the game. I guess these are another 3 months of Battlegrounds and now Duels.
10
I finally understand...
2
Quote from Loomineyes >>This seems like a bazaare thing to say. It's so apparent in how untrue it is. Depends on the deck you're using. Just last week I beat a Paladin that managed to play 4 copies of Hope and I still won. So no, it would have been very foolish of me indeed to auto concede to the first one.
Would it have really been foolish though? Like you said, I guess it depends on deck type. I guess you were playing a priest deck when you dealt with that. But to win that match you had to grind through 32 health worth of hero healing, 4 divine shields and another 32 health worth of taunt minions that the opposing player played for maybe 2 or 3 turns worth of mana. Instead you could have just played 2 or 3 other matches that didn't involve nonsense like that.
I was under the impression we were talking about chances of beating it. If we are talking about time spent playing, that's a different conversation. If that's your concern, then you might consider playing only face hunter and auto conceding against all you bad matchups. Although, if you're on a win streak (pre D5), then it's probably worth playing it out.
For me it's not a time crunch, if it takes a little longer to beat some decks then others, then so be it. My goal is to improve my play, have fun, and I ultimately hold the satisfaction of overcoming a tough opponent and winning an epic game higher then how fast I climb.
And I was playing Galalock. Plague of Flames is a hell of a card.
2
Naaah its fine, try some control decks.
31
Stop playing that face hunter
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
47
You know you are reading a bad thread when:
someone called synthetikmisery claims a players ability to play hs good is directly linked to their name.
3
I love these kind of threads, this and people complaining about other people emoting. It could be as simple as "everyone has up to 90 seconds for their turn to do whatever they want and that's just how it is", but oh no people have to interpret all kinds of things into an opponent roping, get tilted very easily or try to tilt the other person by waiting (which seems to work quite often according to the answers here).
I really don't understand it, it is a game, a turn can take 90 seconds, what is the big deal, why y'all in such a rush? If I do come across someone who takes a long time for their turns for whatever reason I just start doing something in that time, like watch a video, doodle around or whatever. I don't get why some people lose their cool that easily. Must be the same people that lose their shit when the other person uses emotes against them. Hilarious.
2
Hasn't there been a thread "discussing" the exact same thing going around for the past couple of weeks? Why start another one, especially when not even contributing something new besides how you feel about it?
2
Definitely looks like fun, I am missing the shark. What would you substitute it with?
And I am not sure about the healers, will switch out one for zilliax for sure. But it looks like fun and I will give it a spin :)
4
I agree, I am tired of facing some iteration of tempo rogue every single expansion. All the points regarding to the cards you made make sense to me. Maybe the problem goes deeper than that and lids actually within the basic and classic set that never rotates? I don't know.
I also don't really know nor care about if significant numbers of players and streamers are leaving the game or if developers really "love" rogue that much (maybe it's because a lot of players seem to love rogue since it usually allows for fairly cheap decks with which people can easily climb the ladder).
I think mentioning developers and players leaving steers the focus away from the actual point, the problem with rogue as a class. But hey that's just my point of view.
2
Hmm I don't see the value in vargoth, as it seems way too risky with the targetable spells (and if you can play a blessings and vargoth and you opponent doesn't have a board it seems like you are winning anyway ^^).
Yeah I would like to fit 1 equality and 1 more pyro or shrink Ray in there, but I can't seem to find the room :/
3
This made me chuckle. "The problem is not that my favorite class is op right now, it's just that the other I classes are not op enough to compete. Just buff all of them and it will be fine."
Yeah that certainly sounds more reasonable than nerfing rogue XD
1
This. Cw is a good control deck which keeps some of the aggrodecks, mainly rogues, in check. Something that couldnt exist last year because of rexxar, jaina and all the otks. There are barely any other control decks right now because besides hagathas scheme there werent any board clears printed this expansion, therefore the other control classes (priest & warlock) struggle to find a decent control build.
Does that make cw unfair? No, it beats a lot of aggro decks as it is supposed to, it loses a lot to greedier builds and otk-decks,as it is supposed to. Everything is in balance. Stop crying and try to play a different deck if yours keeps losing to warrior. Or live with it and move on.
-10
Thanks for putting up kripps list which is running loot hoarders, so many people just blindly copying the list without even thinking about it. Have to smile every time a warrior drops a loot hoarder, surely there was absolutely no better alternative for card draw available XD
1
What the hell is going on here? This is the 6th page of this thread, probably half of it is good advice on how to get better with gallery priest, yet op keeps asking to stay on topic and give advice for the deck while he is not even playing it anymore!?
I really don't understand, do you actually want more advice? Because what people told you here plus the links plus some testing (like at least 30-50 games) should be enough to get an idea of how to play the deck, if not, then move on. There is no secret thing you have to do on let's say turn 4 to activate the secret powers of the deck, what more do you want? Plus you keep asking to be reported, this seriously feels like a troll post now, I don't know what else there is to say about the deck...