• 0

    posted a message on [LEGEND] Galakrond Control Warrior

    The galakrond is to help finish games, for example against priest it can work very well. The 3 attack each turn can be a lot of pressure.

    Posted in: [LEGEND] Galakrond Control Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on I, for one, like this meta.

    You mean endless demon hunters and rogues aren't fun on the ladder?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Card nerfs or buffs where needed? META stale already :-(

    Good point. Maybe a rework like they did for priest would help other classes. I really hate to see dead classes and archetypes. I would really love to see viable options for aggro, mid range, and control on the ladder.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Card nerfs or buffs where needed? META stale already :-(

    Wow dude...I never said platebreaker was why control warrior is not in the meta...

    I am fine with having a conversation or friendly debate but unless you have actually read my post (which you already admitted you did not)...I do not understand how you can even make accurate points of conversation. 

    P.S. I wasn't aware that three paragraphs was a "wall of text" lol. 

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Card nerfs or buffs where needed? META stale already :-(

    Might help if you had read my post...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Card nerfs or buffs where needed? META stale already :-(

    I wanted to get everyone else's thoughts on this as I have been thinking about it lately. Would it be nice if Blizzard did some balance patches with card buffs and nerfs where needed? I ask this question because it always seems like their answer is to nerf. Yes of course DH needed a nerf...i think we all can agree on that....but how about buffs to other classes that need it? Yes, we saw some recently in the wild meta before rotation but that doesn't really count IMO.

    Let's look at the standard META right now...it's fast. DH's and other aggro all over the place. That's great if you enjoy 5 to 10 min games. Unfortunately, that is not for everyone. I may be the minority here but I prefer things a bit slower and enjoy control decks. It seems that Blizz has completely cut control out of the game on any serious level. (I guess you could argue that gala priest is kind of control...) My point is, I understand it is hard to get a perfect balance for all classes (if that exists) but it is fairly depressing to see the same two or three classes over and over again on the ladder. (seems like a common problem.) Would it be so difficult to buff classes like warrior or maybe shaman that could fit into the control category again, or just aren't seeing play? I just don't understand why Blizz let's certain classes/archetypes rot.

     On a side note, I guess that could be very difficult now (to bring control back) with endless lackey generation and value that rogues and other classes have. Yea, some of that is okay but filling your hand over and over with lackey's and/or value the whole game from start to end with infinite resources just seems dumb to me. Lastly, I have to ask why in the hell did Blizz think it was okay to make the card Platebreaker? I am sorry, but you have now buried control warrior for the next year. I don't understand why you would target a classes hero power and basically make it useless with one card....yes I know people are not running this but if control warrior did try to make a come back, you better believe it would be all over the place.

     In summary, I understand Blizz isn't perfect but I would really love to see some different ideas from them in the future...and please do not make a classes hero power worthless.  

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The new control meta

    Control meta? It's mostly aggro. If you can find a viable control deck that is semi competitive, please let me know....and no I don't really count mage or whatever the hell people are trying to do with warrior.  

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.