• 0

    posted a message on Gluth Heroic Stomper

    Hey Periitel, I'm glad you had success! It's been awhile since I've updated my description. Would you mind telling me which cards you replaced with your cards? I'm going to clean up my suggestions list and let people know what people used as replacements so it can make it easier for them to build with newer cards!

    Posted in: Gluth Heroic Stomper
  • 2

    posted a message on Gluth Heroic Stomper

    Gluttonous Ooze would be a fantastic option with the new expansion! Thanks for the recommendation!

    Posted in: Gluth Heroic Stomper
  • 0

    posted a message on Choose a Champion, Winter Championships

    I voted for Fr0zen.  I knew nothing about any of the competitors. He was just one of the US options, so Fr0zen became my dude. Although I did like DocPwn's story best.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Share your Standard Epic Plays!

    I was spectating my buddy's game.  Posted with his permission. 

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Ever wondered how much will cost you to have all the cardbacks? It is insane!!!
    Quote from ilargyri >>

    I mean, seriously guys the amount of money you have to spent is INSANE!!!!
    3 virtual tickets x 39.99 each = 119.97$
    3 heroes x 9.99 each = 29,97$
    pre-order ONIK = 19.99$
    pre-order BRM = 24.99$
    pre-order TGT = 49.99$
    pre-oder Old Gods = 49.99$
    pre-order Un'Goro = 49.99$
    WOW: Warlords of Draenor DDE (items only, IF you already have WOW) = 15$
    SC2 Legacy of the Void DDE = 29.99$
    Overwatch OE= 59.99$ (on the plus site you have another great game)
    PLUS be a member or TeSPA = MORE than 150$ (if you are outside US)
    Bring us to a beautiful total of  599,87$ !!!!  (it is the same price in euro also)

    Do I need to say more????
    Who is crazy enough to collect them all?
    I can't imagine spending THAT much money on a single game.
    Well 3 actually, but now we are viewing if from HS perspective.

     You've conveniently left out everything else that goes along with these purchases. I get it, that's an insane amount of money, but to say all you got was card backs for it is silly.  Blizzard does a great job of making the value worth it and integrating bonuses for other games as well. They're genius.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Spellbook Duel - Tavern Brawl #84

     Freeze mage worked fantastic. One thing to consider..Gadgetzan Auctioneer is an AWFUL card for this setup. It eventually fills your hand with Examine and there is nothing you can do about it.

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • 0

    posted a message on abandoned mechanics
    Quote from terobero >>

    Joust was bad because the card is trash if you lose the joust, and the card was broken/good if you won the joust. So people don't want to risk it.

     I can agree with that in most cases.  However, the Hunter elephant was an exception.  3/2 for 2 isn't bad, plus the draw effect if you actually win the joust? Wow. However, as most Hunters running that are built don't win the Joust, it was still a good way to see what was coming or what you might have to work around.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Ranked Distribution Percentages - Are They Updated?

    I'm guilty of hitting 20 and going casual unless I have a quest with a deck I like to play ranked with. I used to grind out the lower levels, but I find I enjoy the game more when I'm not trying to push win streaks. So, now I just make sure I get the card back, and I'm typically content with a common or rare gold out of a chest.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on abandoned mechanics
    Quote from user_942705 >>

    Discover is really good, joust wasn't great but it was an interesting mechanic, was helpful in control decks to determine what your opponent was playing

     I agree, the Joust mechanic was interesting. Completely unreliable, but interesting nonetheless!
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Blizzard should remove classic set from standard
    Quote from Balthier21 >>
    Quote from Magico07 >>

    Reworking the classic set by adding some cards rather sounds reasonable instead of letting classic cards rotate out of standard. I even would support this idea like adding certain cards into classic to help certain classes but again...this would make balancing even more complicated and would confuse new players which Blizzard doesn't want at all. 

    The current balance state would actually be great if aggro wouldn't be that strong right now. Blizzard have two choices there. Nerf aggro directly (certain unhealthy cards) or give us more tools to deal with them (cheaper removals,Healbot recycle , big early taunts like Deathlord) .

    I would prefer the first option since some cards are broken (no reason for Lava Burst to be able to target face ; Rockbiter only should target minions or shouldn't stack with weapons ; Call of the Wild basically gets you a board out of nowhere and some burst etc.)

     my point is and i will stop commenting as i said anything i wanted to say so if anyone want to see my whole view on the subject can read the thread 
    hearthstone took the step to introduce formats same as MTG all good so far but they chose classic set to be an evergreen not changing core set for a player to invest for his collection. 
    but the classic set helps some classes more than others and creates some combos that they shouldnt exist in this game forever. this cause some classes (see priest) seem weaker than others (see warrior).
    they tried to balance the classic set with nerfs and making whispers of the old gods a very good expansion from which the majority of the cards have seen play. but yeah its obvious now that this was not enough.
    if hearthstone took the formats from MTG it should take their approach in the core set also. which is a yearly core set for example year of the kraken set which will contain 80% of the classic set but with some cards added from the wild expansions so it can be a BALANCED core set for all the classes.
     
     
     This is a terrible idea. I've played Magic from it's release and one of the biggest issues with it is that it is extremely expensive to keep up with if you want to play it competitively. One of the things I love about Hearthstone is the lack of monetary requirement. You definitely have an advantage if you spend money, but isn't required for enjoyment or remaining competitive. If HS becomes another MTG, then I would quit playing it and just stick with MTG because I definitely wouldn't be able to afford both.
    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 4

    posted a message on !whole new meta deck-worgen combo warrior after karazhan whole new best ver!

    That moment when you don't get the complete combo until your last couple cards, you're down to 7 life (including armor) and you're facing a mage with ice block up.

    Posted in: !whole new meta deck-worgen combo warrior after karazhan whole new best ver!
  • 2

    posted a message on Gluth Heroic Stomper

    Excellent! When N'Zoth was mentioned I figured he'd probably be an amazing addition. Glad to hear he worked well for you!

    Posted in: Gluth Heroic Stomper
  • 0

    posted a message on Gluth Heroic Stomper

    That's a great suggestion! N'zoth didn't exist when I made the deck! He'd be great for it now!

    Posted in: Gluth Heroic Stomper
  • 0

    posted a message on Gluth Heroic Stomper

    The substitution suggestions are greatly appreciated!

    Posted in: Gluth Heroic Stomper
  • 0

    posted a message on Heroic Gluth - Effective and relatively cheap

    Some people have stated that this has been an extremely effective deck to help them beat Heroic Gluth.  Try it out if you're still working on that run!

    http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/455864-gluth-heroic-stomper

    Posted in: Adventures
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.