Hearthpwn

I'm exited for the poisonous change.  Something needed to be done, every single meta ends up being the same thing. You get a board full of poison + divine shield and you win.  Murlocs being in negates 6 other tribes who rely on big stats to win.  This change makes poison still very useful (you can 1-1 any minion) without making it overpowered when combined with divine shield.

The days of 2 poison minions killing over half your board are over, and i'm ALLLLLLLLLLLL for it.

Companies exist to make money.  I'm sorry they are trying to make money.

You get a group of developers who will work for free and you can start making free games without needing to make money.

You find a bunch of developers willing to work for free, then you can start making games for the sake of making games.

Yeah, some people didn't read the card right.   You get back every spell you cast LAST turn.

Really good value card for control shaman.   Might be useful in aggro also to get your burn spells back, assuming you still have 6 mana to play this the next turn.

I'm just glad this isn't a mage/priest/druid card.

Put this in a deck with counterspell and watch your opponent break his keyboard trying to guess which secret to play around.

pretty decent.  boulderfist ogre with an upside 50% of the time.

They HAD to use the "convert" wording.  otherwise this card would not work correctly if you already had armor (See: Crystallizer)

 IF you play Crystallizer x2,  You have 25hp and 5 armor. The second one does nothing till the armor from the first one is gone.

Quote from maroon5five >>

If no aggro decks exist then what would you call murlock mage and odd paladin?

 Those decks don't win on turns 4/5 like face hunter/pirate warrior used to.

Quote from RavenSunHP >>

Btw, has anybody mentioned HealZoo Paladin as another possible application of the new Healing synergy?

I mean, in an Aggro deck, instead of Midrange or Control.

 

 That's what i'm thinking.   This will enable the paladin version of the current warlock zoo.  With extra taunts and lots of heals It might be pretty good vs other aggro decks.  4 mana 8/8's and 2 mana 6/6 taunts can be difficult for other aggro decks to deal with.   

And your whole strategy doesn't go out the window if you face a combo/control deck that doesn't damage your face.

Quote from AmmarDawood >>

Quote from made4victory >>

now there's really little chance of armor tech cards against druid/odd warrior...

cool card though

 Actually ,if this turns out to be OP and Paladin Joins the list of annoying armor classes ,a card that does something to opponent's armor might become necessary .

 

 Huh?  Attacking face is how you get rid of armor. There doesn't need to be a Tech against it.  Literally every card that can hit face is a tech vs armor.

Very interesting, this is an ambiguous comment. Are you bashing Blizzard or bashing the bashers?

Quote from bigtxbug >>

I remember when the App Store launched in 2008 - what a glorious time for mobile gamers. Everything was $5-10 and the games were fantastic. Then came the race to the bottom, but even those 99 cent games were some of the greatest mobile games created.

then came the free to play… couldn’t just be a demo like PC games did forever - it was the full game… FOR FREE! This is awesome!

just like everything in life that is “free”. Someone is going to pay. Here we are. In app purchase hell.

 Well if that model worked so well then why isn't it still around? Oh wait let me guess because of greed? The model worked so well that people paid $5-$10 a game and just kept buying hundreds and hundreds of top-notch games released one after the other from the same vendor so much that they thought it would be prudent to switch to a model that gave away the game for free and charged you to play it? I guess  you never stuck quarters into an arcade machine before huh?  

I can't wait until you kids get the tax bill for everyone who was smart enough to never pay their student loan debt back...hahahahah have fun paying for that. Keep on complaining about mobile gaming and how much you are just ripped off because that's really important.

I can't help but laugh at the comments of children 

I really hoped they won't print " Destroy the enemy hero" ever again.

I hate playing against priests this will make my life even more miserable. 

What evidence do we have that this doesn't work with Secretkeeper?  It has completely different wording than Bellringer Sentry, Mad Scientist, Mysterious Challenger, and Arcane Keysmith?  In the past, Yogg-Saron, Hope's End was explained that it cast the spells, not the player, so that doesn't really apply here either?  I don't know of a card that has this wording on it to compare?

Knowing Hearthstone wording though, it's just inconsistent keyword use. 

Quote from Garlicnerd >>

Quote from Aquellos >>

Bad, Brass Knuckles didn’t see play why would this?

 because this does twice as much buff and has 1 more attack?

 But... if you actually want the buff you have to not only kill something, but actually overkill it. So 2 health or less, effictively making this a 5 mana 2/3 weapon that can’t attack face if you want to get that handbuff. Does that sound playable to you?

Quote from Ch4ce >>

Quote from Aquellos >>

Bad, Brass Knuckles didn’t see play why would this?

 Handbuff is better for Paladin, and it gives twice the buff and extra attack damage for only 1 extra mana.

 The extra attack is decieving. If you want the buff you have to swing at somewith with two health since it’s attached to the Overkill keyword. Brass knuckles you could at least swing at face if you really just wanted your buff.