• 1

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2
    Quote from Kaladin >>
    Quote from FrostyDog247428 >>
    Quote from Kaladin >>
    Quote from UziU >>

    I can relate. Trying to play anything but aggro right now i so damn frustrating.

     I've had varied success with big hand mage.  It does well against hunters (who can't deal with a turn five 8/8) but I'm not sure how it would fare against odd paladin.

     The problem with that is you will lose to priest which is the most popular class at high ranks right now (legend, ranks 1-2). So it depends what rank you are. Lower ranks it might be ok but when you get to legend you will be queuing into endless priest OTKs so it's probably best to go hyper aggro there to counter that cancer.

     I'm currently in the 10-5 bracket because I tried to climb with Kibler's Dragon Evolve Shaman and only faced Hunters. 

     Yeah hunters are very common at those ranks. Once you get to top ranks you will see less and less hunters though and it will be a bunch of OTK bs.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Houndmaster Shaw?
    Quote from scorpyon >>

    Shaw is an amazing card. I certainly wouldnt ever dust mine. 
    And with the rotation affecting Hunter quite heavily, I see him becoming very useful in the next few expacs

     Exactly. I think he will really shine after the rotation. Might be the best hunter legendary even.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Houndmaster Shaw?

    Keep him. One of the best hunter legendaries after rotation. Once old powerful hunter cards rotate Shaw will probably be in top 3 hunter cards. He is already decent in Deathrattle Hunter and after rotation I think he will be stronger and find a place in midrange decks.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Which OTK combo deck do you loathe the most ?

    4 Horsemen is not that bad. I think it's because it's quite interactive. You can disrupt the combo by pressuring opponent and forcing them to play their bouncers early. Late game also you have more time to pu on pressure since they need to roll 4 different horsemen and there is some RNG so it's not guaranteed they get it in 4 turns. So there is counterplay.

    Mecha'thun is worse since only Warlock really has a good counterplay to it. However in next expansion we are getting new Dirty Rat so there will be a way to disrupt Mecha'thun decks I think.

    Personally, I hate Gallery Priest the most. That deck basically kills you on turn 8-9 if they draw the gallery and none of their minions. Totally stupid concept which was a design mistake imho.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Poll: Is Priest overpowerd?

    It's not overpowered but it is very polarising just like warrior, i.e. playing against it is very unfun. Win rates of priest decks are not that great but polarisation and non interactivity has been used as a reason for balance changes in the past. That's why I suspect Priest and Warrior will be on a chopping block in next balance update.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is Blizzard Getting too Trigger Happy with Nerfs?
    Quote from TardisGreen >>

    Why should Blizzard be concerned with the F2P player?   They generate zero revenue.

    People who pay real money to get the new cards want to play with and against the new cards.  It gets boring if every Warrior you met had Fiery War Axe, every Druid Wild Growth and Nourish, every non-aggro Paladin Equality, etc.  The power level of some of these Classic cards needs to be curbed so that classes are forced to rely on the new cards every expansion.  This makes economic sense for Blizzard, and at the same time, makes the game better for the paying customer.

    I certainly don't give a chit about the F2P plebs.  Who needs em anyway.

     Because without F2P players the game would die. It would become another Artifact. You need a large player base to have a healthy environment and also it builds up network effect. More players lead to them bringing more players to the game who potentially might spend money to buy packs in the future. Glad that you aren't in charge at Blizzard with your logic lol.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Let's start with the guessing about next year is about!

    I want another mech expansion, you can never have enough mechs :D

    But I'm sure it won't happen so soon after Boomsday. So I would also bet on next expansions being about dragons, perhaps about elementals also.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on R5 -> Legend // Time??

    Tbh it's not a big deal unless you are a competitive player / pro. Most people that reach legend monthly basically play the game many hours every day. Many of them are streamers or pro players so it's their job to play the game and if you play 8+ hours every day and have >50% win rate you will be reaching legend every month. But for most players it's not worth it as you probably don't have that much time to invest into this game, might have job / life outside of HS.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on R5 -> Legend // Time??

    Well, if you make it too easy then legend status will become less exclusive / easier to achieve. It's supposed to be HARD to get to legend so only most elite players make it. Making it easier just diminishes the achievement.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Control dead?
    Quote from Murl0c_Slayer >>
    Quote from Bluelights >>
    Quote from Murl0c_Slayer >>
    Quote from jazzfan27 >>

    Ok, what I think I'm reading is that the reason that 'hyper aggro' decks aren't ruling the meta is that there aren't any better aggro cards in the pool than are already being used.  The aggro pool of cards is rather shallow.

    Also reading that Odd Rogue is probably the best example of a true aggro deck in the meta.  So that leads me to ask, 'Why isn't Odd Rogue taking over the ladder?'

     

     

     

     

     Again its because the Hunters ! 

    just try and pick any hunter deck and play against odd rogue its nearly a 100% WR ....

     That is just wrong. Odd Rogue Struggles against Spellhunter, in a 40-60% ratio, the other are arround the 50% mark. https://hsreplay.net/archetypes/219/odd-rogue#tab=matchups

     That being said, the fact it's weak to Spell Hunter + Odd Paladin + Even Paladin +OTK Paladin + Odd (quest) Warrior hurts them from being the top deck, but it is one of the strongest decks right now in the meta. 

     I dont care about noobs statistic i just tell you out of Experiences Hunter decks in overall are favoured against Odd rogue  with cards like Flanking strike and stones only noobs would lose .

     Well, from experience I disagree. Spellstone comes too late. By the time you play it you might be dead. Flanking strike is good but it's not amazing. You need a good draw against Odd Rogue and spell hunter can often draw poorly so your initial 3-4 turns you don't do anything (play a secret or one animal companion) and that is usually gg against Odd Rogue.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.