• 0

    posted a message on [Game] Name another card that has the same...

    Animal Companion (Hunter, Common,Beast)

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 0

    posted a message on Finally, Golden Warlock

    Some guy won golden portrait while he was Ragnaros.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg2lnj-TQJs

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Best LOE legendary?
    Quote from GaiusMaxwell >>

    Did you get forget about Justicar Trueheart? :P

     Justicar? In League of Explorers?
    Posted in: Adventures
  • 0

    posted a message on My F2P Adventure.

    Throw Brewmaster, Oasis Snapjaw and Raptors. Add Kill Commands and Unleash the Hounds's instead.

    Also Timber Wolves seem pretty weak too. Eaglehorn Bow would be much better.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Faceless Shambler

    wut? Youre obviously not gonna drop this without getting his battlecry. Think about Handlock , this copies a Giant or Drake and activates itself with Taunt.

    Posted in: Faceless Shambler
  • 0

    posted a message on Making the best Renolock

    About Stalagg , with Shadowflame it's good but too expensive. Also why would you want your Thaddius to get BGH'ed but not your Dr.Boom?

    Thats one of the purposes of Dr. Boom. Making your opponent waste their BGH on a War Golem and not a taunted Giant or Thaddius.

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Making the best Renolock

    I think it is the combo version. Other two's speciality is a BGH target , also Stalagg is really terrible.

    While Golem-Overwhelm-Faceless gives you a reliable win condition.

    But , its better to try first , then talk. I have no idea how each will hold up in the meta.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on No love for Wild?
    Quote from Tze >>

    This community.... Just... Lol. Blizzard makes a reasonable change like add formats, people take the most bizarrely unreasonable stances on the decision.

    You have Wild players looking down on Standard players, Standard players thinking a game without Boom is going to solve their problems, and players in general making absolutely crazy approximations about one mode dying because it's not as "good". Then there's the always-present-but-horribly-flawed idea that this whole thing would be solved if Blizzard just nerfed cards. Oh, also Blizzard's only justifiable reason for making this change is all about money; there are absolutely no benefits from a game design standpoint.

    There are plenty of people who are just going to play each mode because that's what they prefer. There are plenty of those people in this thread who like each mode for their own reasons, which is why I think both modes are going to be great. The sky is definitely not falling. :)

     

     And  then there's the people who throw shit at the community any chance they get and say the most obvious stuff.
    '' Why is everyone sharing their opinion about the new addition to the game? Just play what you want guys (SMILEY FACE).
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Need FAST help pally draft

    http://www.heartharena.com/tierlist

    this can answer your other questions.

    Posted in: The Arena
  • 3

    posted a message on Tentacles for Arms

    It should have been 5 mana 3/1 Deathrattle: EQUIP this weapon. That would be a godlike replacement to Death's Bite. And Warrior's need something like that.

    The problem is that it would crash the game if you play 2 of those. But they should have went with something like this instead of this garbage that makes Warsong Commander jelaous.

    Posted in: Tentacles for Arms
  • 3

    posted a message on Tentacles for Arms

    Infinite value? Not even close , in fact you get negative value with this!

    The fact that you spend 5 mana on this crap and letting your opponent spend his 5 mana on something useful , sets you back on the board state so much that the deathrattle becomes meaningless. (like how Malorne is bad because the deathrattle might not effect the game at all)

    Posted in: Tentacles for Arms
  • 1

    posted a message on No love for Wild?
    Quote from itachiitachi >>
    Quote from mk572 >>

    I'm really sick of hearing this "standard will be cancer-free" bullshit. It's a TCG. There's always a dominant aggro deck and a dominant combo deck. Even in standard. We'll know what "the cancer that ruins standard" is by end of May.

     There's always been dominate decks, but they haven't always been cancerous, undertaker and buzzard metas where fun and diverse compared to the meta we've had for the past 6 months.
     I cant wrap my head around the old Undertaker being fun and diverse. How is instantly losing against a one mana card , if you happen to have no answers to it , is FUN AND DIVERSE? That shit and OP Miracle was cancerous as hell. 
    Also i think i will be playing Wild more than Standart because Standart takes away some of my favorite cards (Mechs , Loatheb , Dr. Boom(op but fun to play and creates some great moments) , Belcher, Sneeds and more)
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Hunter Card - Infest

    Pretty nice! It feels refreshing to see a Hunter card thats not completely useless or straight out broken.

    Has nice synergies and can give you late game options after being dominant early game.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Infest

    6 mana? You know that 3 of that goes to Unleash the Hounds , a card that's already good on its own?

    Posted in: Infest
  • 1

    posted a message on Why is it always the netdeckers that BM?

    Those goddamn illegal ''deckers'' Vote for wryllish , he is a pro player and will

    MAKE HEARTHSTONE GREAT AGAIN!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.