In a way I support this design philosophy in Digital Card Games because they're mostly free and errata can just be applied through patches. Its a little more frustrating because of the raw power some of these cards have, but i do have a genuine question.
Would you rather them make underwhelming cards that aren't powerful? As a business trying to get money off of a free game, they need to make purchasing packs with money seem appealing somehow.
Would it be better if the evergreen sets, Basic and Classic, had a higher level of power itself, to balance out new cards entering at this standard?
This is the reason why year of the raven was the worst standard, The witchwood, Boomsday and Rastakhan where so underwhelming in terms of good cards that the meta game never really changed
true.. i didnt even bother with those bundles..
but for DoD, and AoO .. and Scholo .. got them all + heroes
the only way to keep the game intersting is to print OP cards.. get people to buy preorders and craft legendaries.
Then nerf them in the 1st month to shake up the meta
release another bundle in the middle in between expansion (maybe another hero skin)
Then second nerf (perhaps a buff to some cards, dont count on it) to "shake up" the meta again.
3rd month will be stale waiting for the next expansion.
This is how they keep GAMES interesting..Overpower something.. people love to play overpowered stuff.. then nerf it to be fair.. then just stall untill next expansion. They even admit doing this for overwatch.
This is fine because you will rather have this than 3 months of balanced and boring expansion.
murloc paladin is a trap...looks like a decent deck if you get on curve.. but in reality those murlocs just get removed and then GG...time to try another deck
i played murloc shaman in wild for lols.. its decent and can get to d10
0
In a way I support this design philosophy in Digital Card Games because they're mostly free and errata can just be applied through patches. Its a little more frustrating because of the raw power some of these cards have, but i do have a genuine question.
Would you rather them make underwhelming cards that aren't powerful? As a business trying to get money off of a free game, they need to make purchasing packs with money seem appealing somehow.
Would it be better if the evergreen sets, Basic and Classic, had a higher level of power itself, to balance out new cards entering at this standard?
This is the reason why year of the raven was the worst standard, The witchwood, Boomsday and Rastakhan where so underwhelming in terms of good cards that the meta game never really changed
true.. i didnt even bother with those bundles..
but for DoD, and AoO .. and Scholo .. got them all + heroes
0
You and kibler has no idea.... Team5 is on point.
the only way to keep the game intersting is to print OP cards.. get people to buy preorders and craft legendaries.
Then nerf them in the 1st month to shake up the meta
release another bundle in the middle in between expansion (maybe another hero skin)
Then second nerf (perhaps a buff to some cards, dont count on it) to "shake up" the meta again.
3rd month will be stale waiting for the next expansion.
This is how they keep GAMES interesting..Overpower something.. people love to play overpowered stuff.. then nerf it to be fair.. then just stall untill next expansion. They even admit doing this for overwatch.
This is fine because you will rather have this than 3 months of balanced and boring expansion.
2
way to kill unintended gesture.. should've keep it that way
everyone was happy to get some scholo packs
0
your next expansion preorder bundle
0
I will be preparing anti priest deck..
1
This post is on point
13
I buy every single bundle of every expansion and I think this is bad idea
Just let everyone test decks on the first few days/weeks at least.
4
This one summons it.. so its very annoying
0
HILARIOUS NAME
1
great to see creative hunter deck
-1
because he needs to include 1 new card to grab attention
0
Alec ..nice
0
sargeras is the enemy of the demon hunter (ilidan) .. do you even Legion bro
4
hahahh people voted this card bad..what are you guys smoking..
anyway , probably will get nerfed later kael stylez (increased mana cost)
1. show OP card
2. ppl buy packs
3. nerf card later
thats how we roll baby!
0
murloc paladin is a trap...looks like a decent deck if you get on curve.. but in reality those murlocs just get removed and then GG...time to try another deck
i played murloc shaman in wild for lols.. its decent and can get to d10