Hearthpwn

If someone has no work, he creates some. It seems Blzzard has to many employees nowadays.
What a b_u_l_l_s_h_i_t ... . The idea of battle.net is BATTELING and social interaction.
IT has not really an association with tech... . Poor Blizzard !

 This guide is quite nice, but ths deck is not in anyway competitive.

I tried it out before the changes => 1-10 Stats

After the changes 3-8 ....

And Yes, i have the legendary card back alrdy ...

My suggestions for the 2 (or at least 1) Mad scientist(s).

#1 Echoing Ooze... great  synergy in turn 5 with seal or in turn 6 with Blessing of Kings or Keeper of Uldaman
#2 Haunted Creeper ...somekind of 2-4 stats (best case 5-4 with knifejuggler synergy) compared to 2-2 of mad scientist (best case some kind of 5-4 with avenge value)
#3 Terror Wolf Synergy wiht call to arms, nerubian eggs etc.
#4 Argentum Protector


Your thoughts or try outs ?

Stats 10-10 today at Rank 3. I did several missplays and my mulligan wasn't the best at beginning I guess.
So maybe  a 12-8 would have been realistic.
Anyhow 0-3 vs Warrior and 1-2 vs Priest :-(.

At all I am not convinced by Mukkla. I read your explanation but except on an empty board he sucks a bit imo.

Ogre Brute is not good at all too.
I don't know what to add °_o, because lacking 3 drops here.

Thanks anyhow for deck.

Funny Deck, anyhow even the 50-50 don't work.

1:10 - 2 loss at ranked for fun at, as I lost this morning 15 games in a row (1 win in between) from rank 1.
LAter I got even back to rank 5 - so I donÄt care for 2 loss at rank 4 with this.

Someone has to challenge me with this loss streak at "high" ranks .... .
Then 10 Loss streak with this deck, and after first win i quit ^^ - too slow !

 A good deck is not defined (except the fun factor) by ranking up to rank 5.

I would be much more interested in a large samplesize of stats from rank 5 to legend+.

Would be fine if you can update this here.

Anyhow seems quite viable and interesting - thanks fo that :-)

Thanks for the deck guide, anyhow --> This font size is so ugly... rly man why ...?

Anyhow at my rank 4 right now it just made 13-17 stats for me...so I stopped with it.
It's fun to play, but not viable vs Combo Druid (1-4) and Zoo (1-4) and vs Secret Pala (1-2) , who are  a big part of the META right now.

Please...change the font size... and why everything bold ...?

Beside that, i want to share something out of a bout 150 games with Elise decks.
It's quite 1 ouit of 10 games, where you get the "Golden Monkey" on the board °_°.

You sure maiden can count as MILF ?

Can we please all agree, as a community, to leave this at 69 upvotes?

What a boring and disappointing update! So you guys at Blizzard are pretty happy with the meta? Why don't you just remove everything in the game and add a rock-paper-scissor simulator. I am unable to enjoy climbing with some classes because of the polarizing match ups.

They could have at least made sure to keep the flavour of the classic set, since it was mostly about actualy Warcraft stuff (unless there's a really well known icicle spell that I'M not aware of).

They could have also made them remotelyy useful and not just worse version of existing cards. I mean, two of them are literally just random cards that cost 1 more and Icicle is Coldwraith except worse.

Also, they are actually just trolling with the new heroes at this point. I don't care much, but it just seems like they completely ignore suggestions of the community and just do the opposite for...no reason?

Does the stream need to be LIVE in order for the bits to count for the rewards?

They're planning on releasing it the 7th of August

Capping the amount of battlecries is literally a nerf to Shudderwock. Naturally l expect the ability to fully refund my dust, Blizzard.

Trump is an idiot and dosen't know what the hell he's talking about. We allready knew that a long time ago.