• 1

    posted a message on Will Dragons Rule in Rise of Shadows?
    Quote from ibraman >>

    did mammoths rule in year of the mammoth, or did ravens rule in year of the raven? 

     Well, there was only like 1 mammoth card Giant Mastodon, and a couple of raven cards Raven FamiliarVex Crow (not even a raven lol), maybe Ravencaller also counts?

    Too bad they don't really stick with the theme of the year in expansions.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on There is countdown to reveal of next 10 card
    Quote from SPQR301 >>

    His profile says he's from the US, and he doesn't know the difference between there is and theirs. No wonder Trump is their president.

     

     Wait, did you create your profile just to comment about someone's grammar and earn yourself a reputation of a total dick?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on [Rise of Shadows] What to buy with this budget?
    Quote from souhaib88 >>
    Quote from EpicAD >>
    Quote from I_Feel_Ur_Pain >>

    It clearly says a golden legendary card so yes we get golden one from 80. I know reading is hard for some people and maybe he blind. But come on. 

     No need to be an asshole. Mods haven't yet updated the info about getting a golden legendary in the RoS guide for example.

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/guides/6457-rise-of-shadows

     

    so you need the modes to spell it out for you? You can't read the patch notes yourself too?

     

    I actually feel quite intellectually superior after reading your reply, thanks!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 7

    posted a message on Had to share this misplay.
    Quote from Tzon_e >>
    Quote from LoveAurora >>

    I was expecting something exciting, now im left with my dick in my hand.

     Getting a boner over HS missplays? Man, you are fortunate, that happens to me only with XXX movies.

     You live a very boring life pal

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why do Priest need VERY good cards in the next Expansion
    Quote from HellOnslaught >>

    Everyone is hyping Cheff Naomi in rogue... but i wonder if she could become a win condition in priest combined with Seance

    This is Naomi

     

    This is Chef Nomi

     

    Posted in: Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on New Mage Legendary - Kalecgos
    Quote from hydrafrog >>

    This is meh at best. Unless there's going to be a way to reduce the cost of this minion, Y'sera has this guy beat

     A very good statted minion with a powerfull passive and an immediate effect that synergizes with this passive, and it forces opponent to use resources to kill it, and it can be used both offensively and defensively? You, sir, are very hard to impress. Oh, and its Ysera not Y'sera.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Shaman Legendary - Swampqueen Hagatha

    If we could chose targets for The Runespear just like with this card, it would've been at least decent

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on [Rise of Shadows] What to buy with this budget?
    Quote from I_Feel_Ur_Pain >>

    It clearly says a golden legendary card so yes we get golden one from 80. I know reading is hard for some people and maybe he blind. But come on. 

     No need to be an asshole. Mods haven't yet updated the info about getting a golden legendary in the RoS guide for example.

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/guides/6457-rise-of-shadows

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Who else is impressed by the new "Complete my deck" feature?
    Quote from Astreal >>

    Does it work in wild? I’d say it doesn’t (maybe I missed an announcement about not supporting wild). On an empty deck it gives me:

     

    ### Custom Mage
    # Class: Mage
    # Format: Wild
    #
    # 2x (1) Daring Fire-Eater
    # 2x (1) Mecharoo
    # 2x (1) Zombie Chow
    # 2x (2) Belligerent Gnome
    # 1x (2) Bloodmage Thalnos
    # 1x (2) Flamecannon
    # 2x (2) Plated Beetle
    # 2x (3) Fungal Enchanter
    # 1x (3) Lone Champion
    # 1x (3) Volcanic Potion
    # 2x (4) Animated Armor
    # 2x (4) Fireball
    # 2x (5) Green Jelly
    # 1x (6) Aluneth
    # 1x (6) Arcane Dynamo
    # 1x (6) Blizzard
    # 2x (7) Flamestrike
    # 1x (8) Splitting Festeroot
    # 2x (8) Violet Wurm

    Which is complete horseshit, like Green Jelly... for real??? I have a decent collection and can make a solid secret/Aluneth mage or Reno mage which are the most relevant in the wild meta... and even when I add few cards it fills the rest with part of the deck I just posted.. what?

    i like deck building, but not impressed so far. I hope it gets better in the future.

     

    (in standard it gives me your usual Aggro odd mage)

     This feature is not yet implemented for wild decks

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Who else is impressed by the new "Complete my deck" feature?

    I actually hoped that if I put a crappy legendary in my deck and use "complete my deck" then it would automatically make the best possible deck around this card. Unfortunately you have to leave as less empty deck slots as possible, otherwise it will just make you the highest winrate deck with has nothing to do with your crappy card. For example, I've put only 2 Pogo-Hoppers and the deckbuilder made me a standard Malygos Rogue without any synergy with pogos.

    But overall it still is great, especially for people with limited collection, This new system does a really good job with making highest winrate decks possible with your collection.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on I don't get it. Why is RoS icon a bird?

    How do I unsee it now?!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on I don't get it. Why is RoS icon a bird?

    Wtf the eye really does look like a bird (added an eye so it could be a little bit more obvious)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New expansion feels great!
    Quote from Hooghout >>
    Quote from EpicAD >>
    Quote from Hooghout >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from Hooghout >>
    Quote from Strongpoint >>

     

    Quote from Hooghout >>

    But one thing is clear: your species of human kind is Blizzards way to make Hearthstone a hell for those who actually want to play a game of skill.

     My deck is greedier then yours so I win IS NOT a game of skill.

     Fanboys also have fast entrenched prejudices.

     Lmao…. the game has been like that since beta kiddo

    Not like this is anything new

     A never-ending developers craving for a sustained mindless ranked meta or just the succes formula to attract mainly the EpicAD, Sherman1986 and the Strongpoints of this world ?

     What have you turned this thread into lol. If I want to play competitive games where skill matters I'll just launch CS:GO, DotA 2, Overwatch, Starcraft, etc. Hearthstone was meant to be a casual game.

    I have no desire to argue about any of your points because, well, you're boring and stubborn as fuck. I honestly respect your rights to have an opinion, but could you please stop belittling other people for not sharing it.

    If there's a group of people whom belittle you, it is the Devs. They consider you not capable of handling a higher skill floor in ranked meta. What they give you is either spam-buff-go face or OTK: rush guaranteed for the target audience: the only two viable win conditions a.t.m. Very diverse don't you think? Quod non.

    You don't want to argue about any of my points. Since you are dumbed down by Devs to choose between only two mentioned win conditions, I understand you simple have no arguments. 

    I'll keep fighting for you to end this belittlement and press for more diverse win conditions in line with your supreme skill capabilities. Be freed from this Devs-matrix. It is the choice between the red or the bleu pill.

     

    Again, Hearthstone is a casual game. If devs decide to keep using easier design for most of their cards, I'll be totally ok with it. I still don't get why it is so important for you to make Hearthstone a "high-skill" game, which will inevitably make matches last longer and decrease interest in it for the majority - casual players. Why would I care about any of the stuff you're talking about If I just want to have some dumb fun in Hearthstone after work in the evening with my wife. I've already said that there are other games to prove that "my skill is bigger than yours, scrub" and I hope Hearthstone will never become one of them.

    Oh and if people don't want to argue with you, it doesn't really mean they have no arguments (not always of course), its just a common way to save your time against stubborn people. What you're fighting for are your own elitist interests and nothing more than that. I also wouldn't be surprised if you're still studying at school, this is the most likely explanation for the fact that you take games way too seriously than one should.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New expansion feels great!
    Quote from I_Feel_Ur_Pain >>

    Why is this even a topic lol we saw  9 cards  so far. You are to easy to get excited for something that u hardly seen all the cards for. Please I have some nice ocean view hotel I want to sell you.

    Quote from HunterXhunterHS >>

    Not really, no... We saw absolutely nothing yet, how could we decide if we are pleased or not? This just seems like you are bored out of your mind and you would be happy with a new "welcome" tab when you enter the game :P

     "Do you like the new expansion so far?"

    Actually you guys are right about that its pretty strange that people get excited after seeing like less than 10% of the content :D

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New expansion feels great!
    Quote from Hooghout >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from Hooghout >>
    Quote from Strongpoint >>

     

    Quote from Hooghout >>

    But one thing is clear: your species of human kind is Blizzards way to make Hearthstone a hell for those who actually want to play a game of skill.

     My deck is greedier then yours so I win IS NOT a game of skill.

     Fanboys also have fast entrenched prejudices.

     Lmao…. the game has been like that since beta kiddo

    Not like this is anything new

     A never-ending developers craving for a sustained mindless ranked meta or just the succes formula to attract mainly the EpicAD, Sherman1986 and the Strongpoints of this world ?

     What have you turned this thread into lol. If I want to play competitive games where skill matters I'll just launch CS:GO, DotA 2, Overwatch, Starcraft, etc. Hearthstone was meant to be a casual game.

    I have no desire to argue about any of your points because, well, you're boring and stubborn as fuck. I honestly respect your rights to have an opinion, but could you please stop belittling other people for not sharing it.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.