The minimum of games you need to play to get exactly 88% winrate is 25 (that's 22 wins and 3 losses). It's a decent sample size, but I'm more curious to know what rank did OP got such a good winrate at. If that was rank 5 or above then it's safe to assume the deck is good in the current meta.
All you need are 3 cards, 9 mana and at least 2 enemy minions on the board. This will give you 4 cards back (3 random one from Lock + the Hat) as well as 5 split damage to clear. Gets even better if you've got a Hunter's Mark in hand too
Very good! Tried it out after a bad winstreak and won 3 consecutive games against very different archetypes: Midrange Druid, Patron Warrior and Dragon Priest.
You're obviously salty because you lost a few games with the deck. That doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, you might have had bad RNG over those few games or you might not be used to that style (greedy tempo)
12
And yet not a single new card in the decklist. Why do this, are you really that hungry for views?
3
With Leper Gnome and Knife Juggler permanently nerfed + Mad Scientist, Haunted Creeper and Glaivezooka gone in standard, Face Hunter is as good as dead. Good fucking riddance
0
The sad part is this deck loses nearly nothing in standard. Months of Freeze Mage vs Face Shaman are gonna be real fun...
4
"This card is garbage."
Used far too liberally to describe cards that are in fact good but haven't found a place in any netdeck
0
Master of Evolution would be really sick with Brann Bronzebeard on the boar
0
The minimum of games you need to play to get exactly 88% winrate is 25 (that's 22 wins and 3 losses). It's a decent sample size, but I'm more curious to know what rank did OP got such a good winrate at. If that was rank 5 or above then it's safe to assume the deck is good in the current meta.
Personally I'd remove Sunfury Protector for an Acolyte of Pain since drawing your Molten Giants, Echo of Medivh, Ice Blocks and Reno Jackson is essentially your win condition. The only decks more draw is bad against are the rare fatigue decks which very few people play
2
Lock and Load => Unleash the Hounds => Explorer's Hat trade => Explorer's Hat trade :D
All you need are 3 cards, 9 mana and at least 2 enemy minions on the board. This will give you 4 cards back (3 random one from Lock + the Hat) as well as 5 split damage to clear. Gets even better if you've got a Hunter's Mark in hand too
3
Very good! Tried it out after a bad winstreak and won 3 consecutive games against very different archetypes: Midrange Druid, Patron Warrior and Dragon Priest.
I did replace Piloted Shredders with Water Elementals to fuck up paladins, shamans and warrior FeelsGoodMan
3
There's been TGT, LoE and meta has considerably changed.
If you can't see that this would very much affect how effective this decklist is today, you're probably not that good of a player to start with
2
A deck that hasn't been updated in 9 months isn't working out for you? What are you surprised about buddy
-5
No Silver Hand Regent?... WINDFURY HARPY?! DansGame
2
Loses to any cancer deck
2
You're obviously salty because you lost a few games with the deck. That doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, you might have had bad RNG over those few games or you might not be used to that style (greedy tempo)
-7
Because it's another cancer deck in a world of cancer decks. Have fun playing your generic face deck buddy
-12
Hey look it's cancer paladin with Nerubian Eggs and Djinni of Zephyrs in it. Groundbreaking !