Doesn't seem worth the hassle. Consider, while you can use the "no duplicate legendary cards" to maybe get Elysiana again in order to dust her, if you just buy packs from the other expansion, you'll get legendary cards you're missing since you can't get duplicates. Dusting Elysiana: 1600 dust. Opening a different legendary from some other expansion: also worth 1600 dust. There's no real gain.
except with Elysiana you can chose any legendary you want instead of just getting a random one
this is why adding echo to magnetic is a bad idea.
but I don't think we should have much to worry about, I am sure that for the first few days everyone will play it because it is the new deck, but then everyone will see that it is just another jank deck.
I don't have much faith in this deck because decks like inner fire priest, and the Glinda crowskin > mechwarper > magnetic card combo are not very amazing.
Can someone explain the balance of Zeppelin? It's a pre-nerf CtA on a body, and then on top of that it gives the minions rush.
it also costs almost twice as much. which is a HUGE downside because when CtA was nerfed by 1 mana, it became a lot less OP, and this card costs 3 more mana.
I was expecting there to be a blue-post from blizzard explaining this new update, but there wasn't. I am a bit disappointed, I would love to hear from blizzard about why they decided to change their no-buff policy.
earlier today Hearthstone was not working so I decided to delete it and re-download it. But now when I try to start it it just says "updating blizzard agent" and "downloading new files" and the message disappears and nothing happens. I have tried downloading it multiple times and I always get the same thing. I am sorry if I am just being stupid and overlooking something, but I don't know what to do. I am using a Windows 7.
I don't understand, would you rather that they just stopped making new sets after league of explorers, and left us in that meta for ever?
you are basically saying that making new cards is bad because then the cards that are good now and no longer good. but that is just plain wrong, the game needs new cards to grow, otherwise it would be the same game for 5 years, instead we have new decks every 4 months, with nerfs to keep things interesting in between.
you also mention that wild is a bad thing, that makes no sense. think about it, if they never make a wild format, then standard would be wild, and if you want that, then you can go play wild. would you rather they never rotated cards out, and everyone has to play wild all the time with no option to play standard?
how do you think this deck will hold up after the nerfs? Obviously the nerf to Elysiana will not hurt the deck much, I was mainly referring to how the meta will shift, and if you think the deck will get better, or worse matchups.
I will experimenter some, but I would like to hear what you have to say about how good you think the deck is after the nerfs.
master's call doesn't tutor beasts, it just draws them. the difference is that in midrange hunter, your deck wants to have a lot of minions, and all of them have to be beasts. but with raiding party, you can run whatever minions you want, and still have this card that can draw you a weapon and two minions that synergize with it.
master's call limits deck space, and is not as consistent.
would you really run a brew master on the off chance that it is against another control deck and you happen to be going first? probably not, like you said, its a coin flip. so you would probably not want to give up a card slot just so you can maybe expand your deck.
0
care to elaborate?
1
except with Elysiana you can chose any legendary you want instead of just getting a random one
0
this is why adding echo to magnetic is a bad idea.
but I don't think we should have much to worry about, I am sure that for the first few days everyone will play it because it is the new deck, but then everyone will see that it is just another jank deck.
I don't have much faith in this deck because decks like inner fire priest, and the Glinda crowskin > mechwarper > magnetic card combo are not very amazing.
0
it also costs almost twice as much. which is a HUGE downside because when CtA was nerfed by 1 mana, it became a lot less OP, and this card costs 3 more mana.
4
whats sad is that people like you can't tell a complaint thread from any other thread discussing cards.
1
I was expecting there to be a blue-post from blizzard explaining this new update, but there wasn't. I am a bit disappointed, I would love to hear from blizzard about why they decided to change their no-buff policy.
0
earlier today Hearthstone was not working so I decided to delete it and re-download it. But now when I try to start it it just says "updating blizzard agent" and "downloading new files" and the message disappears and nothing happens. I have tried downloading it multiple times and I always get the same thing. I am sorry if I am just being stupid and overlooking something, but I don't know what to do. I am using a Windows 7.
2
I don't understand, would you rather that they just stopped making new sets after league of explorers, and left us in that meta for ever?
you are basically saying that making new cards is bad because then the cards that are good now and no longer good. but that is just plain wrong, the game needs new cards to grow, otherwise it would be the same game for 5 years, instead we have new decks every 4 months, with nerfs to keep things interesting in between.
you also mention that wild is a bad thing, that makes no sense. think about it, if they never make a wild format, then standard would be wild, and if you want that, then you can go play wild. would you rather they never rotated cards out, and everyone has to play wild all the time with no option to play standard?
2
how do you think this deck will hold up after the nerfs? Obviously the nerf to Elysiana will not hurt the deck much, I was mainly referring to how the meta will shift, and if you think the deck will get better, or worse matchups.
I will experimenter some, but I would like to hear what you have to say about how good you think the deck is after the nerfs.
0
master's call doesn't tutor beasts, it just draws them. the difference is that in midrange hunter, your deck wants to have a lot of minions, and all of them have to be beasts. but with raiding party, you can run whatever minions you want, and still have this card that can draw you a weapon and two minions that synergize with it.
master's call limits deck space, and is not as consistent.
0
I also want a un-nerfed card mode.
4
would you really run a brew master on the off chance that it is against another control deck and you happen to be going first? probably not, like you said, its a coin flip. so you would probably not want to give up a card slot just so you can maybe expand your deck.
0
jeez dude, chill out. . .
I don't understand why you are so angry about my comment, it did not hurt anyone.
4
no Barnes nerf still?
don't get me wrong, I think these nerfs are justified, but Barnes has gone un-touched for to long.
2
I am pretty sure it is after you complete all the chapters