• 0

    posted a message on Mean Steets of Gadgetzan: Arena Impact
    Quote from neonangel >>
     It is good that you tell us, when you make updates, so we don't always Need to check whether new revealed Cards are added or not. However, i think it would be even more helpful if you could post the Review of the new added Cards as well, so you have to go back to the first page.
    Posted in: The Arena
  • 4

    posted a message on Priest will probably be broken

    Once again, some people judge way too early

    Posted in: Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on Mean Steets of Gadgetzan: Arena Impact

    Interesting that Piranha Launcher is the best Card for you so far. In my opinion it is not really good. I might be wrong, since i am not very experienced with Hunter, but that weapon seems pretty slow. Furthermore, the damage is not high enough to kill most of the minions and the 1/1 are not really a thread. I don't know if it is worth to give up a whole turn and loss board control for that. I feel once you played this Card you Need to go all in and hope you can kill him, before he kills you. The 1/1s might help here to Keep the Opponent busy, but if your opponents has a big taunt or good heal, you might loss the game, because of that.

    Posted in: The Arena
  • 0

    posted a message on average gold gain after new quests
    Quote from DoubleSummon >>

    Since the average Gold for quests is higher than 50 Gold, it would make sense to reroll 50 Gold to maximize your Gold Outcome. Furthermore, you can consider to not do a quest on the same if you reroll and your new quest is only 40 Gold worth and to reroll it the next day.
    However, this will make it more complicated and you can't be precise anyway. If i get a "win 5 games with X or Y" quest, i gain another 16,67 Gold, while it is not clear how many wins i make when i do a "Play 50 xxx Cards".

     you play to win anyway most of the time and play 50 class cards is also more or less 5 wins.. since in a winning game you played a lot of cards most of the time(you know curve, or a lot of removal) so you roughly played 10 class cards per win (most cards in decks since WOTOG are class cards, the neutral set is a lot weaker on purpose, in GVG+Naxx it was the other way around cuz every deck had like 10 neutral stamples)
     Well, many might Play to win, but not everyone is doing that. Recently, i Play on three accounts and i try to get the quests done as soon as possible, so i put in as many Cards as possible. Sometimes i even win, but most of the time i do not.
    And even if you try to win all games. People use different decks and have different win rates.
    The Overall Point is that you can't say in General how many wins someone got after finishing the quests.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on average gold gain after new quests

    Since the average Gold for quests is higher than 50 Gold, it would make sense to reroll 50 Gold to maximize your Gold Outcome. Furthermore, you can consider to not do a quest on the same if you reroll and your new quest is only 40 Gold worth and to reroll it the next day.
    However, this will make it more complicated and you can't be precise anyway. If i get a "win 5 games with X or Y" quest, i gain another 16,67 Gold, while it is not clear how many wins i make when i do a "Play 50 xxx Cards".

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on To those of you who have multiple accounts, do you think it's worth it?

    I Play on 3 accounts and the time i spent to do only daily quest is actually a lot. Like 1,5 hours Minimum a day. I have the time so it is more or less okay, but i don't think that it is really worth it. It is good though if you use this accounts to Train for Arena.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Hearthstone World Championships Group Stage Day 4

    So far just one guy mentioned Blizzard, not even complaining directly. Sure, it doesn't make sense, because Blizzard has no influence on that, but it is not so uncommon to call out for Blizzard in different situations. Many streamers do that. 

    And what where you thinking when you wrote your second last sentence? Man, that is so arrogant. Like you were so much smarter than all other, because you had the right pick and we are all stupid, because we just choose him, only because he is a famous streamer. First of all, Handsomeguy wasn't dominitating or anything. With a different luck Distribution, you were the one with the wrong pick. And how is someone who won Blizzcon Europe last year, lost super Close in the semifinal in the last World Championship and was the first from europe to qualify for this years Blizzcon a stupid pick??? 

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Captain Blackheart's Treasure - Tavern Brawl #72

    Usually i like to Play Brawls, but this one is soo damn SLOW !

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • 0

    posted a message on The New Quests Trigger Me
    Quote from 4wd >>
    Quote from 4wd >>
    Quote from Broadbean >>

    Had the Stablemaster one. Created a Hunter deck with just beasts and knocked out a 50 gold quest in three minutes. 

    Three whole minutes in casual, shocking! I am so triggered! Oh me oh my!

    Derp. 

     Not everyone likes playing stupid decks in casual. I prefer doing quests collateral with laddering. It's impossible with new system.
    Why should every quest designed in a way that it fits for ladder? And not everyone enjoys doing quest and is happy when you do them quickly. Especially helpful for People who struggle to win games.
    And what is the Hugh difference anyway? The stablemaster one is like winning 3 games with hunter. If you would do that quest on ladder, then it shouldn't be a Problem to do the stablemaster one on ladder. It might take a Little longer so.
     How could someone struggle to win games? The ladder designed that way that everyone is playing at his skill level with avg. 50% winrate.
    Hugh difference is that some quests with new system you really can't do effectively in the ladder. Like murlocs or beasts, or secrets; they way too specific, and it's easier to make concede deck for casual instead of really do them with real deck. Blizzard promote stupidity this way, how you can like it?
    The ladder is not designed like that for People with a bad Collection. Besides my main account, i Play on NA from time to time and i Play with the account of my Girl friend as well. Both have a bad Collection and even on ranks 20-25 you meet top Tier decks. From 20 on it is mainly those decks. I Usually just want to do the quests to buy some packs now and then. When you meet only top Tier decks from rank 20 on, it can become really tough to get the quest done. For less skilled beginners it is even more hard and therefore Frustrating.
    It is not a Hugh difference. Usually you are playing only up to 2 decks on ladder, maybe 3. Otherwise you don't Play it serious anyway. And therefore most quests can't be done on ladder as well. At least you have to reroll a lot. But you can do the same here.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The New Quests Trigger Me
    Quote from 4wd >>
    Quote from Broadbean >>

    Had the Stablemaster one. Created a Hunter deck with just beasts and knocked out a 50 gold quest in three minutes. 

    Three whole minutes in casual, shocking! I am so triggered! Oh me oh my!

    Derp. 

     Not everyone likes playing stupid decks in casual. I prefer doing quests collateral with laddering. It's impossible with new system.
    Why should every quest designed in a way that it fits for ladder? And not everyone enjoys doing quest and is happy when you do them quickly. Especially helpful for People who struggle to win games.
    And what is the Hugh difference anyway? The stablemaster one is like winning 3 games with hunter. If you would do that quest on ladder, then it shouldn't be a Problem to do the stablemaster one on ladder. It might take a Little longer so.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on One Night in Karazhan: Arena Impact
    Quote from CBenoitWG >>
    Quote from Boss_of_this_Gym >>
    Quote from neonangel >>
    Quote from Boss_of_this_Gym >>

    I wish we could have a dislike button in the forums. This guy the OP rated Malchezaar and Enchanted Raven as better than Firelands Portal

     These were all initial thoughts before the set was even released.  After having played with the set for 2 months it's easy to say which cards performed better.
    My complaint points to the fact you didn't give any valid argument for why you thought both Raven and Malchezaar would be better than Firelands Portal. You just considered the dream scenario for both cards.
    In the average case, Malchezaar is a Pit Fighter with a downside and Enchanted Raven is just a worst  Zombie Chow. It wasn't so hard to tell, with other cards it could be more tricky, but not with these cards.
     Since when getting 5 legendaries in your deck is a downside in Arena?
     It was widely discussed here. Just read through the thread
    Posted in: The Arena
  • 0

    posted a message on One Night in Karazhan: Arena Impact
    Quote from neonangel >>
    Quote from Boss_of_this_Gym >>

    I wish we could have a dislike button in the forums. This guy the OP rated Malchezaar and Enchanted Raven as better than Firelands Portal

     These were all initial thoughts before the set was even released.  After having played with the set for 2 months it's easy to say which cards performed better.
     But why don't you upgrade it then. Otherwise this thread would be only interesting before the release and would become useless afterwards. People come here to check on the performance of the cards and when they can only find initial thoughts about the cards from before the release they are misleaded. At least it should not be pinned to the top of the forum, if the assessments are not updated. 
    Posted in: The Arena
  • 0

    posted a message on All-Star Squad is This Week's Brawl

    I am wondering that no one did mention Mechwarper and Selfless Hero yet. Both beats spell decks (only Selfless Hero struggles against Ice Lance i guess) and all other kind of cancer minion decks (mechwarper might struggle against tidecaller decks, didn't had that match up yet). 

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.