Decks would not remain the same after they no longer have to accommodate for aggro. We need less aggro, but abolishing it entirely would utterly ruin the game.
Well, someone should go through and calculate which would work better. Can't say that joust isn't good though, since it isn't even out yet (aside from some terribly designed brawl decks)
No one is debating that you are a good player, and we all (or at least I) upvote your interesting, innovative decks. But when you post a vanilla Face Hunter with no real guide or interesting content (that couldn't be found 100 other places) it kinda looks like you're just trying to advertise yourself.
You shared a budget eboladin which has the similarity of other 20 eboladin decks and then post here "Was it really necessary to post yet another Face Hunter deck?" before criticising someone look at yourself first dude if u do same why do u try to say sth that already done by u
I only did that because someone asked me to show a deck that I had used personally to hit rank 5+ that required no expansions or legendaries. Same with my mech shaman. I would never post a 100% copy deck without any useful guide on it for another reason.
Yea probably, Mal'Ganis would be nice but not necessary. If you have Jaraxxus though maybe look into Demon Handlock though if you have Jaraxxus. Just put together a 2 set of Molten and Mountain giants.
Oh yeah if you have Jaraxxus and giants you can make a demon handlock. Just sub some other beefy demon in for Malganis.
You can actually cut mountain giants from demon handlock and run something like Loatheb and Siphon Soul, which would probably be better in this meta anyway.
2
Decks would not remain the same after they no longer have to accommodate for aggro. We need less aggro, but abolishing it entirely would utterly ruin the game.
0
Use whatever one you want and write an explanation.
Locked.
1
Well, someone should go through and calculate which would work better. Can't say that joust isn't good though, since it isn't even out yet (aside from some terribly designed brawl decks)
1
Druid, and there's some hunter deck. You can use the search function.
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks?filter-contains-card=23235&filter-deck-tag=4&filter-deck-type-val=9&filter-deck-type-op=4
1
I believe they just removed the visible stars, not the gold gain.
0
I'd probably run 1 Effigy and 1 Mirror Entity. Can't really see why you'd run Polymorph. Curve a little too high.
0
This is a very misleading title.
Locked.
2
No one is debating that you are a good player, and we all (or at least I) upvote your interesting, innovative decks. But when you post a vanilla Face Hunter with no real guide or interesting content (that couldn't be found 100 other places) it kinda looks like you're just trying to advertise yourself.
0
I only did that because someone asked me to show a deck that I had used personally to hit rank 5+ that required no expansions or legendaries. Same with my mech shaman. I would never post a 100% copy deck without any useful guide on it for another reason.
1
Was it really necessary to post yet another Face Hunter deck?
0
Just a warning, demon handlock is one of the hardest decks to play. Make sure you watch some videos and read some guides before you try it out.
0
Oh yeah if you have Jaraxxus and giants you can make a demon handlock. Just sub some other beefy demon in for Malganis.
You can actually cut mountain giants from demon handlock and run something like Loatheb and Siphon Soul, which would probably be better in this meta anyway.
Something like this
But sub Loatheb and Siphon Soul for mountains, Emperor for Sylvanas, Dread Infernal for Malganis, and some other beefy card for dr. boom.
0
Demonlock isn't a top-tier deck, so making a suboptimal version of it is unlikely to facilitate easy laddering.
That being said, I'm sure it is possible to hit rank 5 with an aggressive demonlock deck, if you're a decent player.
1
Some good points in this thread, but the personal attacks and flaming have gotten a bit out of hand.
Locked.
1
Ok, it clearly wasn't the 18th.
Locked.